在治疗青少年踝关节巩膜损伤时比较螺钉固定和缝合扣固定的效果

Luke Verlinsky, David M. Heath, David A. Momtaz, Boris Christopher, Aaron Singh, Steven D Gibbons
{"title":"在治疗青少年踝关节巩膜损伤时比较螺钉固定和缝合扣固定的效果","authors":"Luke Verlinsky, David M. Heath, David A. Momtaz, Boris Christopher, Aaron Singh, Steven D Gibbons","doi":"10.1177/18632521241238889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ankle injuries involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis often necessitate operative fixation to restore stability to the ankle. Recent literature in the adult population has suggested that suture button fixation may be superior to screw fixation. There is little evidence as to which construct is preferable in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study investigates outcomes of suture button and screw fixation in adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries. A retrospective matched cohort study over 10 years of pediatric patients who underwent ankle syndesmotic fixation at a large Level 1 Trauma Center was conducted. Both isolated syndesmotic injuries and ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption were included. Preoperative variables collected include basic patient demographics, body mass index, and fracture type. Suture button and screw cohorts were matched based on age, race, sex, and open fracture utilizing propensity scores. Outcomes assessed include reoperation and implant failure. A total of 44 cases of operative fixation of the ankle syndesmosis were identified with a mean age of 16 years. After matching cohorts based on age, sex, race, and open fracture status, there were 17 patients in the suture button and screw cohorts, respectively. Patients undergoing screw fixation had a six times greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.043) and 13 times greater risk of implant failure (p < 0.001). Out of six cases of reoperation in the screw cohort, five were unplanned. Our findings favor suture button fixation in operative management of adolescent tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Compared with screws, suture buttons are associated with lower risk of both reoperation and implant failure. level III therapeutic.","PeriodicalId":138259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","volume":"132 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of screw and suture button fixation in the management of adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries\",\"authors\":\"Luke Verlinsky, David M. Heath, David A. Momtaz, Boris Christopher, Aaron Singh, Steven D Gibbons\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18632521241238889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ankle injuries involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis often necessitate operative fixation to restore stability to the ankle. Recent literature in the adult population has suggested that suture button fixation may be superior to screw fixation. There is little evidence as to which construct is preferable in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study investigates outcomes of suture button and screw fixation in adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries. A retrospective matched cohort study over 10 years of pediatric patients who underwent ankle syndesmotic fixation at a large Level 1 Trauma Center was conducted. Both isolated syndesmotic injuries and ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption were included. Preoperative variables collected include basic patient demographics, body mass index, and fracture type. Suture button and screw cohorts were matched based on age, race, sex, and open fracture utilizing propensity scores. Outcomes assessed include reoperation and implant failure. A total of 44 cases of operative fixation of the ankle syndesmosis were identified with a mean age of 16 years. After matching cohorts based on age, sex, race, and open fracture status, there were 17 patients in the suture button and screw cohorts, respectively. Patients undergoing screw fixation had a six times greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.043) and 13 times greater risk of implant failure (p < 0.001). Out of six cases of reoperation in the screw cohort, five were unplanned. Our findings favor suture button fixation in operative management of adolescent tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Compared with screws, suture buttons are associated with lower risk of both reoperation and implant failure. level III therapeutic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"132 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521241238889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521241238889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

涉及胫腓联合的踝关节损伤往往需要通过手术固定来恢复踝关节的稳定性。最近的成人文献表明,缝合扣固定可能优于螺钉固定。至于在儿童和青少年群体中哪种结构更好,目前还没有什么证据。本研究调查了青少年踝关节巩膜损伤的缝合扣固定和螺钉固定的效果。该研究对在一家大型一级创伤中心接受踝关节巩膜固定术的儿童患者进行了一项为期 10 年的回顾性匹配队列研究。研究对象包括孤立的踝关节巩膜损伤和伴有巩膜断裂的踝关节骨折。术前收集的变量包括患者的基本人口统计学特征、体重指数和骨折类型。根据年龄、种族、性别和开放性骨折情况,利用倾向评分法对缝合扣和螺钉队列进行匹配。评估结果包括再次手术和植入失败。共确定了 44 例踝关节巩膜手术固定病例,平均年龄为 16 岁。在根据年龄、性别、种族和开放性骨折状态进行分组匹配后,缝合扣和螺钉固定组分别有 17 名患者。接受螺钉固定的患者再次手术的风险高出六倍(p = 0.043),植入失败的风险高出 13 倍(p < 0.001)。在接受螺钉固定的六例再次手术中,有五例是计划外的。在青少年胫腓联合损伤的手术治疗中,我们的研究结果更倾向于缝合扣固定。与螺钉相比,缝合按钮的再手术风险和植入失败风险都较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of screw and suture button fixation in the management of adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries
Ankle injuries involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis often necessitate operative fixation to restore stability to the ankle. Recent literature in the adult population has suggested that suture button fixation may be superior to screw fixation. There is little evidence as to which construct is preferable in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study investigates outcomes of suture button and screw fixation in adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries. A retrospective matched cohort study over 10 years of pediatric patients who underwent ankle syndesmotic fixation at a large Level 1 Trauma Center was conducted. Both isolated syndesmotic injuries and ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption were included. Preoperative variables collected include basic patient demographics, body mass index, and fracture type. Suture button and screw cohorts were matched based on age, race, sex, and open fracture utilizing propensity scores. Outcomes assessed include reoperation and implant failure. A total of 44 cases of operative fixation of the ankle syndesmosis were identified with a mean age of 16 years. After matching cohorts based on age, sex, race, and open fracture status, there were 17 patients in the suture button and screw cohorts, respectively. Patients undergoing screw fixation had a six times greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.043) and 13 times greater risk of implant failure (p < 0.001). Out of six cases of reoperation in the screw cohort, five were unplanned. Our findings favor suture button fixation in operative management of adolescent tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Compared with screws, suture buttons are associated with lower risk of both reoperation and implant failure. level III therapeutic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信