大剂量皮下注射 Spesolimab 对皮肤表现的影响:预防泛发性脓疱型银屑病复发的关键性试验 Effisayil 2 的结果

Bruce Strober, Matthias Augustin, Yayoi Tada, Amit Garg, D. Jullien, Alice B. Gottlieb, Johann Gudjonsson, Na Hu, Patrick Hofmann, C. Thoma, Angelo Marzano
{"title":"大剂量皮下注射 Spesolimab 对皮肤表现的影响:预防泛发性脓疱型银屑病复发的关键性试验 Effisayil 2 的结果","authors":"Bruce Strober, Matthias Augustin, Yayoi Tada, Amit Garg, D. Jullien, Alice B. Gottlieb, Johann Gudjonsson, Na Hu, Patrick Hofmann, C. Thoma, Angelo Marzano","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & Objectives: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare and potentially life-threatening skin disease, characterized by flares of sterile pustules. Spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, is an effective and approved treatment for GPP flares in adults. Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837) was a pivotal, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab in preventing GPP flares. Here, we report the effect of high-dose spesolimab versus placebo on GPP lesions. \nMaterials & Methods: Eligible patients with a history of GPP were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of three subcutaneous spesolimab regimens or placebo for 48 weeks. High-dose spesolimab regimen was loading dose 600 mg, followed by maintenance dose 300 mg every 4 weeks. GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) subscores for erythema, pustules and scaling/crusting, and total score were compared between high-dose spesolimab and placebo groups at baseline and over the treatment period (scale: 0, clear to 4, severe). \nResults: Proportion of patients with baseline score of 0 for each GPPGA subscore and total score was generally similar between treatment groups, except erythema; (high-dose spesolimab [n=30] vs placebo [n=31]: erythema, 13.3% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 67.7%; scaling/crusting, 23.3% vs 22.6%; total score, 10.0% vs 12.9%). By Week 4, proportion of patients with scores of 0 increased with high-dose spesolimab versus placebo, (erythema, 33.3% vs 19.4%; pustules, 80.0% vs 41.9%; scaling/crusting, 30.0% vs 19.4%; total score, 26.7% vs 16.1%), and high-dose spesolimab group had fewer flares (10.0% vs 35.5%). This trend was maintained at Week 24 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 63.3% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 36.7% vs 19.4%; total score, 33.3% vs 19.4%) and Week 48 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 43.3% vs 25.8%; total score, 36.7% vs 22.6%). There were no new flares after Week 4 in high-dose spesolimab group; however, flares increased with placebo (45.2% at Week 24; 51.6% at Week 48). \nConclusion: Versus placebo, high-dose subcutaneous spesolimab resulted in a greater proportion of patients maintaining GPPGA scores of 0, a lower proportion having flares at Week 4, and no new flares after Week 4. This was sustained at Weeks 24 and 48. ","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":"150 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of High-Dose Subcutaneous Spesolimab on Skin Manifestations: Results from the Pivotal Effisayil 2 Trial of Flare Prevention in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Strober, Matthias Augustin, Yayoi Tada, Amit Garg, D. Jullien, Alice B. Gottlieb, Johann Gudjonsson, Na Hu, Patrick Hofmann, C. Thoma, Angelo Marzano\",\"doi\":\"10.25251/skin.8.supp.371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction & Objectives: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare and potentially life-threatening skin disease, characterized by flares of sterile pustules. Spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, is an effective and approved treatment for GPP flares in adults. Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837) was a pivotal, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab in preventing GPP flares. Here, we report the effect of high-dose spesolimab versus placebo on GPP lesions. \\nMaterials & Methods: Eligible patients with a history of GPP were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of three subcutaneous spesolimab regimens or placebo for 48 weeks. High-dose spesolimab regimen was loading dose 600 mg, followed by maintenance dose 300 mg every 4 weeks. GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) subscores for erythema, pustules and scaling/crusting, and total score were compared between high-dose spesolimab and placebo groups at baseline and over the treatment period (scale: 0, clear to 4, severe). \\nResults: Proportion of patients with baseline score of 0 for each GPPGA subscore and total score was generally similar between treatment groups, except erythema; (high-dose spesolimab [n=30] vs placebo [n=31]: erythema, 13.3% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 67.7%; scaling/crusting, 23.3% vs 22.6%; total score, 10.0% vs 12.9%). By Week 4, proportion of patients with scores of 0 increased with high-dose spesolimab versus placebo, (erythema, 33.3% vs 19.4%; pustules, 80.0% vs 41.9%; scaling/crusting, 30.0% vs 19.4%; total score, 26.7% vs 16.1%), and high-dose spesolimab group had fewer flares (10.0% vs 35.5%). This trend was maintained at Week 24 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 63.3% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 36.7% vs 19.4%; total score, 33.3% vs 19.4%) and Week 48 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 43.3% vs 25.8%; total score, 36.7% vs 22.6%). There were no new flares after Week 4 in high-dose spesolimab group; however, flares increased with placebo (45.2% at Week 24; 51.6% at Week 48). \\nConclusion: Versus placebo, high-dose subcutaneous spesolimab resulted in a greater proportion of patients maintaining GPPGA scores of 0, a lower proportion having flares at Week 4, and no new flares after Week 4. This was sustained at Weeks 24 and 48. \",\"PeriodicalId\":22013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介和目标:泛发性脓疱型银屑病(GPP)是一种慢性、罕见且可能危及生命的皮肤病,其特点是无菌性脓疱复发。斯派索利单抗是一种抗白细胞介素-36受体的单克隆抗体,是治疗成人脓疱型银屑病复发的有效药物,并已获得批准。Effisayil 2(NCT04399837)是一项关键性随机对照试验,评估了皮下注射斯派索利单抗预防GPP复发的有效性和安全性。在此,我们报告了大剂量斯派索利单抗与安慰剂相比对 GPP 病变的影响。材料与方法:有 GPP 病史的合格患者随机(1:1:1:1:1)接受三种皮下注射斯派索利单抗方案或安慰剂中的一种,为期 48 周。高剂量斯派索利单抗方案为负荷剂量 600 毫克,随后每 4 周维持剂量 300 毫克。比较了大剂量斯派索利单抗组和安慰剂组在基线和治疗期间的红斑、脓疱、脱屑/结痂的GPP医生总体评估(GPPGA)子评分和总评分(评分标准:0分,无明显症状至4分,严重)。结果除红斑外,各治疗组 GPPGA 子评分和总评分基线为 0 分的患者比例基本相似(大剂量斯派索利单抗[n=30] vs 安慰剂[n=31]:红斑,13.3% vs 22.6%;脓疱,66.7% vs 67.7%;脱屑/结痂,23.3% vs 22.6%;总分,10.0% vs 12.9%)。到第4周时,大剂量斯派索利单抗与安慰剂相比,得分为0的患者比例有所增加(红斑,33.3% vs 19.4%;脓疱,80.0% vs 41.9%;脱屑/结痂,30.0% vs 19.4%;总分,26.7% vs 16.1%),而且大剂量斯派索利单抗组的复发率较低(10.0% vs 35.5%)。这一趋势在第24周(红斑,36.7% vs 22.6%;脓疱,63.3% vs 45.2%;脱屑/结痂,36.7% vs 19.4%;总分,33.3% vs 19.4%)和第48周(红斑,36.7% vs 22.6%;脓疱,66.7% vs 45.2%;脱屑/结痂,43.3% vs 25.8%;总分,36.7% vs 22.6%)保持不变。大剂量斯派索利单抗组在第4周后没有出现新的复发;但安慰剂组的复发率有所增加(第24周为45.2%;第48周为51.6%)。结论与安慰剂相比,大剂量皮下注射斯派索利单抗可使更多患者的GPPGA评分维持在0分,降低第4周复发的比例,并且在第4周后不再出现新的复发。这种情况在第24周和第48周得以持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of High-Dose Subcutaneous Spesolimab on Skin Manifestations: Results from the Pivotal Effisayil 2 Trial of Flare Prevention in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Introduction & Objectives: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare and potentially life-threatening skin disease, characterized by flares of sterile pustules. Spesolimab, an anti-interleukin-36 receptor monoclonal antibody, is an effective and approved treatment for GPP flares in adults. Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837) was a pivotal, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab in preventing GPP flares. Here, we report the effect of high-dose spesolimab versus placebo on GPP lesions. Materials & Methods: Eligible patients with a history of GPP were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of three subcutaneous spesolimab regimens or placebo for 48 weeks. High-dose spesolimab regimen was loading dose 600 mg, followed by maintenance dose 300 mg every 4 weeks. GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) subscores for erythema, pustules and scaling/crusting, and total score were compared between high-dose spesolimab and placebo groups at baseline and over the treatment period (scale: 0, clear to 4, severe). Results: Proportion of patients with baseline score of 0 for each GPPGA subscore and total score was generally similar between treatment groups, except erythema; (high-dose spesolimab [n=30] vs placebo [n=31]: erythema, 13.3% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 67.7%; scaling/crusting, 23.3% vs 22.6%; total score, 10.0% vs 12.9%). By Week 4, proportion of patients with scores of 0 increased with high-dose spesolimab versus placebo, (erythema, 33.3% vs 19.4%; pustules, 80.0% vs 41.9%; scaling/crusting, 30.0% vs 19.4%; total score, 26.7% vs 16.1%), and high-dose spesolimab group had fewer flares (10.0% vs 35.5%). This trend was maintained at Week 24 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 63.3% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 36.7% vs 19.4%; total score, 33.3% vs 19.4%) and Week 48 (erythema, 36.7% vs 22.6%; pustules, 66.7% vs 45.2%; scaling/crusting, 43.3% vs 25.8%; total score, 36.7% vs 22.6%). There were no new flares after Week 4 in high-dose spesolimab group; however, flares increased with placebo (45.2% at Week 24; 51.6% at Week 48). Conclusion: Versus placebo, high-dose subcutaneous spesolimab resulted in a greater proportion of patients maintaining GPPGA scores of 0, a lower proportion having flares at Week 4, and no new flares after Week 4. This was sustained at Weeks 24 and 48. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信