评估与发展的认识论:我们如何知道我们知道什么?

Deborah E. Rupp, George C. Thornton, Tiffany M. Bisbey, Anna N. Hoover, Eduardo Salas, Kevin R. Murphy
{"title":"评估与发展的认识论:我们如何知道我们知道什么?","authors":"Deborah E. Rupp, George C. Thornton, Tiffany M. Bisbey, Anna N. Hoover, Eduardo Salas, Kevin R. Murphy","doi":"10.1017/iop.2024.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To make informed decisions, assessment theorists, researchers, and practitioners can evaluate the overlap among (1) relevant theories, (2) empirical contributions, and (3) best practices. Unfortunately, such a task may seem daunting due to the so-called science-practice gap, which can thwart collaboration among these parties. This paper presents an epistemology for delineating the importance of integrating these three sources of knowledge. We then apply this epistemology to show that our current knowledge of assessment and development topics are well integrated in some places, but still quite lacking in others.","PeriodicalId":515605,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","volume":"309 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An epistemology for assessment and development: how do we know what we know?\",\"authors\":\"Deborah E. Rupp, George C. Thornton, Tiffany M. Bisbey, Anna N. Hoover, Eduardo Salas, Kevin R. Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/iop.2024.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n To make informed decisions, assessment theorists, researchers, and practitioners can evaluate the overlap among (1) relevant theories, (2) empirical contributions, and (3) best practices. Unfortunately, such a task may seem daunting due to the so-called science-practice gap, which can thwart collaboration among these parties. This paper presents an epistemology for delineating the importance of integrating these three sources of knowledge. We then apply this epistemology to show that our current knowledge of assessment and development topics are well integrated in some places, but still quite lacking in others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"309 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了做出明智的决定,评估理论家、研究人员和实践者可以评估 (1) 相关理论、(2) 经验贡献和 (3) 最佳实践之间的重叠。遗憾的是,由于所谓的科学与实践之间的差距,这样的任务可能看起来很艰巨,这会阻碍这些方面的合作。本文提出了一种认识论,用于界定整合这三种知识来源的重要性。然后,我们运用这一认识论来说明,我们目前关于评估与发展主题的知识在某些地方得到了很好的整合,但在另一些地方仍然相当匮乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An epistemology for assessment and development: how do we know what we know?
To make informed decisions, assessment theorists, researchers, and practitioners can evaluate the overlap among (1) relevant theories, (2) empirical contributions, and (3) best practices. Unfortunately, such a task may seem daunting due to the so-called science-practice gap, which can thwart collaboration among these parties. This paper presents an epistemology for delineating the importance of integrating these three sources of knowledge. We then apply this epistemology to show that our current knowledge of assessment and development topics are well integrated in some places, but still quite lacking in others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信