{"title":"\"在开罗,我也担心我的考古学朋友\":J. Norman Lockyer 和考古天文学","authors":"Beatrice Honey Steele","doi":"10.5070/ac3.1667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has long been acknowledged that J. Norman Lockyer played a central role in the foundation of archaeoastronomy as a field in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. His interest in “orientation” flourished on a visit to Egypt, where he became convinced that rigorous scientific methods could be used to prove archaeological theories concerning ancient religions.However, despite the promising prospect of a public intellectual entering the sparse discourse around archaeoastronomy, little happened to promote the discipline after the Egyptian expedition. Whilst Lockyer is often framed as a lonely figure working at the dawn of the field, newly digitised lantern slides from the Norman Lockyer Observatory archives reveal his extensive interactions with a dedicated network of British archaeoastronomical researchers. Lockyer’s work, along with that of his new community, came at a very unfortunate time. This paper seeks to explain why he was shunned by prominent archaeologists, and why the discourse around archaeoastronomy up until his time smothered Lockyer’s attempts to legitimize orientation.","PeriodicalId":443576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomy in Culture","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“In Cairo also I worried my archaeological friends”: J. Norman Lockyer and Archaeoastronomy\",\"authors\":\"Beatrice Honey Steele\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/ac3.1667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has long been acknowledged that J. Norman Lockyer played a central role in the foundation of archaeoastronomy as a field in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. His interest in “orientation” flourished on a visit to Egypt, where he became convinced that rigorous scientific methods could be used to prove archaeological theories concerning ancient religions.However, despite the promising prospect of a public intellectual entering the sparse discourse around archaeoastronomy, little happened to promote the discipline after the Egyptian expedition. Whilst Lockyer is often framed as a lonely figure working at the dawn of the field, newly digitised lantern slides from the Norman Lockyer Observatory archives reveal his extensive interactions with a dedicated network of British archaeoastronomical researchers. Lockyer’s work, along with that of his new community, came at a very unfortunate time. This paper seeks to explain why he was shunned by prominent archaeologists, and why the discourse around archaeoastronomy up until his time smothered Lockyer’s attempts to legitimize orientation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Astronomy in Culture\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Astronomy in Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/ac3.1667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomy in Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/ac3.1667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
J. Norman Lockyer 在 19 世纪末和 20 世纪初建立考古天文学这一领域中发挥了核心作用,这一点早已得到公认。他对 "方位 "的兴趣是在一次埃及之行中萌发的,在那里,他坚信可以用严谨的科学方法来证明有关古代宗教的考古学理论。然而,尽管一位公共知识分子进入考古天文学稀缺的讨论领域前景广阔,但埃及之行之后,这门学科的推广却鲜有进展。虽然洛克耶经常被描述成一个在这一领域的黎明期孤独工作的人物,但诺曼-洛克耶天文台档案中最新数字化的灯笼幻灯片却揭示了他与英国考古天文学研究者专门网络的广泛互动。洛克耶的工作以及他的新团体的工作都发生在一个非常不幸的时刻。本文试图解释为什么著名考古学家对他避之唯恐不及,以及为什么直到他的时代,围绕考古天文学的讨论都在扼杀洛克耶将方向合法化的尝试。
“In Cairo also I worried my archaeological friends”: J. Norman Lockyer and Archaeoastronomy
It has long been acknowledged that J. Norman Lockyer played a central role in the foundation of archaeoastronomy as a field in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. His interest in “orientation” flourished on a visit to Egypt, where he became convinced that rigorous scientific methods could be used to prove archaeological theories concerning ancient religions.However, despite the promising prospect of a public intellectual entering the sparse discourse around archaeoastronomy, little happened to promote the discipline after the Egyptian expedition. Whilst Lockyer is often framed as a lonely figure working at the dawn of the field, newly digitised lantern slides from the Norman Lockyer Observatory archives reveal his extensive interactions with a dedicated network of British archaeoastronomical researchers. Lockyer’s work, along with that of his new community, came at a very unfortunate time. This paper seeks to explain why he was shunned by prominent archaeologists, and why the discourse around archaeoastronomy up until his time smothered Lockyer’s attempts to legitimize orientation.