PSMA PET/CT 和 mpMRI 在检测前列腺癌生化复发方面的正面比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Xinru Zhang, Zhe Ma
{"title":"PSMA PET/CT 和 mpMRI 在检测前列腺癌生化复发方面的正面比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Xinru Zhang, Zhe Ma","doi":"10.1097/cu9.0000000000000242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This study aimed to evaluate the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in comparison to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa).\n \n \n \n We conducted a comprehensive search for articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, spanning the inception of the database until October 26, 2022, which included head-to-head comparisons of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for assessing the biochemical recurrence of PCa.\n \n \n \n A total of 5 studies including 228 patients were analyzed. The overall positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa after final treatment were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–0.89) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36–0.88), respectively. The positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and bone metastases were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.30–0.47) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22–0.67), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35–0.56) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17–0.35), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.11–0.31) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05–0.25), respectively. Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT exhibited a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastases, and no significant difference in the positivity rate of local recurrence was observed between these 2 imaging modalities.\n \n \n \n Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT appears to have a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa. Although both imaging methods showed similar positivity rates of detecting local recurrence, PSMA PET/CT outperformed PSMA PET/CT in detecting lymph node involvement and overall recurrence.\n","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Head-to-head comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xinru Zhang, Zhe Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/cu9.0000000000000242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n This study aimed to evaluate the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in comparison to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa).\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted a comprehensive search for articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, spanning the inception of the database until October 26, 2022, which included head-to-head comparisons of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for assessing the biochemical recurrence of PCa.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 5 studies including 228 patients were analyzed. The overall positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa after final treatment were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–0.89) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36–0.88), respectively. The positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and bone metastases were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.30–0.47) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22–0.67), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35–0.56) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17–0.35), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.11–0.31) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05–0.25), respectively. Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT exhibited a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastases, and no significant difference in the positivity rate of local recurrence was observed between these 2 imaging modalities.\\n \\n \\n \\n Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT appears to have a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa. Although both imaging methods showed similar positivity rates of detecting local recurrence, PSMA PET/CT outperformed PSMA PET/CT in detecting lymph node involvement and overall recurrence.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":39147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/cu9.0000000000000242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cu9.0000000000000242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PSMA PET/CT)与多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)在检测前列腺癌(PCa)生化复发方面的性能比较。 我们全面检索了发表在 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 上的文章,时间跨度从数据库建立之初到 2022 年 10 月 26 日,其中包括 PSMA PET/CT 和 mpMRI 在评估 PCa 生化复发方面的正面比较。 共分析了包括 228 名患者在内的 5 项研究。PSMA PET/CT 和 mpMRI 检测最终治疗后 PCa 生化复发的总阳性率分别为 0.68(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.52-0.89)和 0.56(95% CI,0.36-0.88)。PSMA PET/CT和mpMRI检测局部复发、淋巴结转移和骨转移的阳性率分别为0.37(95% CI,0.30-0.47)和0.38(95% CI,0.22-0.67)、0.44(95% CI,0.35-0.56)和0.25(95% CI,0.17-0.35),以及0.19(95% CI,0.11-0.31)和0.12(95% CI,0.05-0.25)。与mpMRI相比,PSMA PET/CT在检测生化复发和淋巴结转移方面显示出更高的阳性率,而这两种成像模式在局部复发的阳性率方面没有明显差异。 与 mpMRI 相比,PSMA PET/CT 检测 PCa 生化复发的阳性率似乎更高。虽然两种成像方法检测局部复发的阳性率相似,但PSMA PET/CT在检测淋巴结受累和整体复发方面优于PSMA PET/CT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Head-to-head comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in comparison to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). We conducted a comprehensive search for articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, spanning the inception of the database until October 26, 2022, which included head-to-head comparisons of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for assessing the biochemical recurrence of PCa. A total of 5 studies including 228 patients were analyzed. The overall positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa after final treatment were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–0.89) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.36–0.88), respectively. The positivity rates of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detecting local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and bone metastases were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.30–0.47) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.22–0.67), 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35–0.56) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17–0.35), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.11–0.31) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05–0.25), respectively. Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT exhibited a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastases, and no significant difference in the positivity rate of local recurrence was observed between these 2 imaging modalities. Compared with mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT appears to have a higher positivity rate for detecting biochemical recurrence of PCa. Although both imaging methods showed similar positivity rates of detecting local recurrence, PSMA PET/CT outperformed PSMA PET/CT in detecting lymph node involvement and overall recurrence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信