绿色-灰色沿海防洪基础设施的生命周期评估:新奥尔良案例研究

Rahaf Hasan, Lauren McPhillips, Gordon P. Warn, Melissa Bilec
{"title":"绿色-灰色沿海防洪基础设施的生命周期评估:新奥尔良案例研究","authors":"Rahaf Hasan, Lauren McPhillips, Gordon P. Warn, Melissa Bilec","doi":"10.1088/2634-4505/ad3578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The study compared the life cycle environmental impacts of three coastal flood management strategies: grey infrastructure (levee), green-grey infrastructure (levee and oyster reef), and a do-nothing scenario, considering the flood damage of a single flooding event in the absence of protection infrastructure. A case study was adopted from a New Orleans, Louisiana residential area to facilitate the comparison. Hazus software, design guidelines, reports, existing projects, and literature were utilized as foreground data for modeling materials. A process-based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach was used to assess environmental impacts. The life cycle environmental impacts included global warming, ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, smog formation, resource depletion, ecotoxicity, and various human health effects. The Ecoinvent database was used for the selected life cycle unit processes. The mean results show green-grey infrastructure as the most promising strategy across most impact categories, reducing 47% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the do-nothing strategy. Compared to grey infrastructure, green-grey infrastructure mitigates 13% to 15% of the environmental impacts while providing equivalent flood protection. A flooding event with a 100-year recurrence interval in the study area is estimated at 34 million kg of CO2 equivalent per kilometer of shoreline, while grey and green-grey infrastructure mitigating such flooding is estimated to be 21 and 18 million kg, respectively. This study reinforced that coastal flooding environmental impacts are primarily caused by rebuilding damaged houses, especially concrete and structural timber replacement, accounting for 90% of GHG emissions, with only 10% associated with flood debris waste treatment. The asphalt cover of the levee was identified as the primary contributor to environmental impacts in grey infrastructure, accounting for over 75% of GHG emissions during construction. We found that there is an important interplay between grey and green infrastructure and optimizing their designs can offer solutions to sustainable coastal flood protection.","PeriodicalId":476263,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research: infrastructure and sustainability","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of green–grey coastal flood protection infrastructure: a case study from New Orleans\",\"authors\":\"Rahaf Hasan, Lauren McPhillips, Gordon P. Warn, Melissa Bilec\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2634-4505/ad3578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The study compared the life cycle environmental impacts of three coastal flood management strategies: grey infrastructure (levee), green-grey infrastructure (levee and oyster reef), and a do-nothing scenario, considering the flood damage of a single flooding event in the absence of protection infrastructure. A case study was adopted from a New Orleans, Louisiana residential area to facilitate the comparison. Hazus software, design guidelines, reports, existing projects, and literature were utilized as foreground data for modeling materials. A process-based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach was used to assess environmental impacts. The life cycle environmental impacts included global warming, ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, smog formation, resource depletion, ecotoxicity, and various human health effects. The Ecoinvent database was used for the selected life cycle unit processes. The mean results show green-grey infrastructure as the most promising strategy across most impact categories, reducing 47% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the do-nothing strategy. Compared to grey infrastructure, green-grey infrastructure mitigates 13% to 15% of the environmental impacts while providing equivalent flood protection. A flooding event with a 100-year recurrence interval in the study area is estimated at 34 million kg of CO2 equivalent per kilometer of shoreline, while grey and green-grey infrastructure mitigating such flooding is estimated to be 21 and 18 million kg, respectively. This study reinforced that coastal flooding environmental impacts are primarily caused by rebuilding damaged houses, especially concrete and structural timber replacement, accounting for 90% of GHG emissions, with only 10% associated with flood debris waste treatment. The asphalt cover of the levee was identified as the primary contributor to environmental impacts in grey infrastructure, accounting for over 75% of GHG emissions during construction. We found that there is an important interplay between grey and green infrastructure and optimizing their designs can offer solutions to sustainable coastal flood protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":476263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental research: infrastructure and sustainability\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental research: infrastructure and sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad3578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research: infrastructure and sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad3578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究比较了三种沿海洪水管理策略的生命周期环境影响:灰色基础设施(堤坝)、绿色-灰色基础设施(堤坝和牡蛎礁),以及 "无为 "方案,即考虑在没有保护基础设施的情况下一次洪水事件的洪水破坏。为便于比较,采用了路易斯安那州新奥尔良市居民区的案例研究。Hazus 软件、设计指南、报告、现有项目和文献被用作建模材料的基础数据。采用基于过程的生命周期评估(LCA)方法来评估环境影响。生命周期环境影响包括全球变暖、臭氧消耗、酸化、富营养化、烟雾形成、资源枯竭、生态毒性以及对人类健康的各种影响。选定的生命周期单元过程使用了 Ecoinvent 数据库。平均结果表明,在大多数影响类别中,绿色-灰色基础设施是最有前景的策略,与 "无所作为 "策略相比,可减少 47% 的温室气体排放。与灰色基础设施相比,绿色-灰色基础设施可减轻 13% 至 15% 的环境影响,同时提供同等的防洪保护。据估算,在研究区域内发生 100 年一遇的洪水时,每千米海岸线的二氧化碳当量为 3400 万千克,而灰色和绿灰色基础设施缓解这种洪水的二氧化碳当量分别为 2100 万千克和 1800 万千克。这项研究进一步证实,沿海洪水对环境的影响主要来自受损房屋的重建,特别是混凝土和结构木材的更换,占温室气体排放量的 90%,只有 10%与洪水废墟垃圾处理有关。堤坝的沥青覆盖层被认为是造成灰色基础设施环境影响的主要因素,占施工期间温室气体排放量的 75% 以上。我们发现,灰色和绿色基础设施之间存在着重要的相互作用,优化它们的设计可以为可持续的沿海防洪提供解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life cycle assessment of green–grey coastal flood protection infrastructure: a case study from New Orleans
The study compared the life cycle environmental impacts of three coastal flood management strategies: grey infrastructure (levee), green-grey infrastructure (levee and oyster reef), and a do-nothing scenario, considering the flood damage of a single flooding event in the absence of protection infrastructure. A case study was adopted from a New Orleans, Louisiana residential area to facilitate the comparison. Hazus software, design guidelines, reports, existing projects, and literature were utilized as foreground data for modeling materials. A process-based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach was used to assess environmental impacts. The life cycle environmental impacts included global warming, ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, smog formation, resource depletion, ecotoxicity, and various human health effects. The Ecoinvent database was used for the selected life cycle unit processes. The mean results show green-grey infrastructure as the most promising strategy across most impact categories, reducing 47% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the do-nothing strategy. Compared to grey infrastructure, green-grey infrastructure mitigates 13% to 15% of the environmental impacts while providing equivalent flood protection. A flooding event with a 100-year recurrence interval in the study area is estimated at 34 million kg of CO2 equivalent per kilometer of shoreline, while grey and green-grey infrastructure mitigating such flooding is estimated to be 21 and 18 million kg, respectively. This study reinforced that coastal flooding environmental impacts are primarily caused by rebuilding damaged houses, especially concrete and structural timber replacement, accounting for 90% of GHG emissions, with only 10% associated with flood debris waste treatment. The asphalt cover of the levee was identified as the primary contributor to environmental impacts in grey infrastructure, accounting for over 75% of GHG emissions during construction. We found that there is an important interplay between grey and green infrastructure and optimizing their designs can offer solutions to sustainable coastal flood protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信