阿司咪唑混悬液在小儿花粉热维持治疗中的应用:与特非那定混悬液的比较。

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1986-01-01
M G Grillage, J W Harcup, S R Mayhew, L Huddlestone
{"title":"阿司咪唑混悬液在小儿花粉热维持治疗中的应用:与特非那定混悬液的比较。","authors":"M G Grillage,&nbsp;J W Harcup,&nbsp;S R Mayhew,&nbsp;L Huddlestone","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study was carried out in general practice during the summer months of 1985 to compare the efficacy and tolerance of astemizole suspension with terfenadine suspension in the treatment of paediatric hay fever. The 65 patients who entered the study were all aged between 6 and 12 years and had suffered from hay fever in at least one previous season. Each child was randomly allocated to receive either 5 ml astemizole suspension (1 mg/ml) once daily or 5 ml terfenadine suspension (6 mg/ml) twice daily for a period of 8 weeks on a single-blind basis. Symptom scores assessed by the patient (or parent/guardian) on two visual analogue scales for ocular and nasal symptoms showed no significant difference between the treatment groups, neither did an analysis of visual analogue scores for runny nose, blocked nose, wheeze, sneezing or eye symptoms assessed by the investigator on entry or after 4 and 8 weeks. The global assessments made by the investigator at 4 weeks and the patient at 8 weeks, however, indicated significantly better overall symptom control in the astemizole group. Both treatments were well tolerated, side-effects being few and minor.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"4 10","pages":"642-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Astemizole suspension in the maintenance treatment of paediatric hay fever: a comparison with terfenadine suspension.\",\"authors\":\"M G Grillage,&nbsp;J W Harcup,&nbsp;S R Mayhew,&nbsp;L Huddlestone\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A study was carried out in general practice during the summer months of 1985 to compare the efficacy and tolerance of astemizole suspension with terfenadine suspension in the treatment of paediatric hay fever. The 65 patients who entered the study were all aged between 6 and 12 years and had suffered from hay fever in at least one previous season. Each child was randomly allocated to receive either 5 ml astemizole suspension (1 mg/ml) once daily or 5 ml terfenadine suspension (6 mg/ml) twice daily for a period of 8 weeks on a single-blind basis. Symptom scores assessed by the patient (or parent/guardian) on two visual analogue scales for ocular and nasal symptoms showed no significant difference between the treatment groups, neither did an analysis of visual analogue scores for runny nose, blocked nose, wheeze, sneezing or eye symptoms assessed by the investigator on entry or after 4 and 8 weeks. The global assessments made by the investigator at 4 weeks and the patient at 8 weeks, however, indicated significantly better overall symptom control in the astemizole group. Both treatments were well tolerated, side-effects being few and minor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"642-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1985年夏季进行了一项研究,比较阿司咪唑混悬液和特非那定混悬液治疗儿科花粉热的疗效和耐受性。参加这项研究的65名患者年龄都在6到12岁之间,至少在之前的一个季节患过花粉热。每个儿童在单盲基础上随机分配接受5ml阿司咪唑混悬液(1mg /ml)每天一次或5ml特非那定混悬液(6mg /ml)每天两次,为期8周。患者(或家长/监护人)在两种视觉模拟量表上评估的眼部和鼻腔症状的症状评分在治疗组之间没有显着差异,研究者在入院时或4周和8周后评估的流鼻涕、鼻塞、喘息、打喷嚏或眼部症状的视觉模拟评分也没有分析。然而,研究者在第4周和患者在第8周进行的整体评估表明,阿司咪唑组的总体症状控制明显更好。两种治疗方法耐受性良好,副作用少且轻微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Astemizole suspension in the maintenance treatment of paediatric hay fever: a comparison with terfenadine suspension.

A study was carried out in general practice during the summer months of 1985 to compare the efficacy and tolerance of astemizole suspension with terfenadine suspension in the treatment of paediatric hay fever. The 65 patients who entered the study were all aged between 6 and 12 years and had suffered from hay fever in at least one previous season. Each child was randomly allocated to receive either 5 ml astemizole suspension (1 mg/ml) once daily or 5 ml terfenadine suspension (6 mg/ml) twice daily for a period of 8 weeks on a single-blind basis. Symptom scores assessed by the patient (or parent/guardian) on two visual analogue scales for ocular and nasal symptoms showed no significant difference between the treatment groups, neither did an analysis of visual analogue scores for runny nose, blocked nose, wheeze, sneezing or eye symptoms assessed by the investigator on entry or after 4 and 8 weeks. The global assessments made by the investigator at 4 weeks and the patient at 8 weeks, however, indicated significantly better overall symptom control in the astemizole group. Both treatments were well tolerated, side-effects being few and minor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信