高密度城市三维和容积城市形态中不断发展的研究方法:评估公共和准公共空间类型

IF 0.6 0 ARCHITECTURE
Hee Sun Choi, Gerhard Bruyns, Tian Cheng, Jiangtao Xie
{"title":"高密度城市三维和容积城市形态中不断发展的研究方法:评估公共和准公共空间类型","authors":"Hee Sun Choi, Gerhard Bruyns, Tian Cheng, Jiangtao Xie","doi":"10.3846/jau.2024.18841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An appropriate urban density is a vital part of a sustainable urban fabric. However, when it comes to measuring the built urban fabric and how people walk through it and use, a difficulty has been observed in defining applicable measurement tools. With the intention of identifying the variables that will allow the best characterization of this fabric and movement, a multi-variable analysis methodology from the field of artificial intelligence (AI) is proposed. The main objective of this paper is to prove the capacity of AI as an evolving research method in urban morphology and specifically to evaluate the capacity of such a methodology to measure the way in which people travel through defined multi-levels of typologies of public urban space. The research uses the case of Hong Kong as a dense city that is three-dimensionally activated in terms of its public realm, not just at street level, but also via below ground subways and upper-level walkways, public and quasi-public spaces. This includes the three-dimensional volumetric assessment of public and quasi-public space typologies within a highly dense city. For the purpose of the study, a characterization and term definition of these spaces has been further developed: “Junctions”, “Landmarks”, “Intersections”, “Districts”, “Passages” and “Lobbies” (both outdoor and indoor) based on Lynch’s 5 main key elements (District, landmark, path, edges, node). The results obtained using AI prove to be more robust and rational than those based on a more limited range of tools, evidencing that using AI can offer operational opportunities for better understanding of morphological and typological evolution within the vertical and volumetric built urban fabric.","PeriodicalId":53978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVOLVING RESEARCH METHOD IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL AND VOLUMETRIC URBAN MORPHOLOGY OF A HIGHLY DENSE CITY: ASSESSING PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC SPACE TYPOLOGIES\",\"authors\":\"Hee Sun Choi, Gerhard Bruyns, Tian Cheng, Jiangtao Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/jau.2024.18841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An appropriate urban density is a vital part of a sustainable urban fabric. However, when it comes to measuring the built urban fabric and how people walk through it and use, a difficulty has been observed in defining applicable measurement tools. With the intention of identifying the variables that will allow the best characterization of this fabric and movement, a multi-variable analysis methodology from the field of artificial intelligence (AI) is proposed. The main objective of this paper is to prove the capacity of AI as an evolving research method in urban morphology and specifically to evaluate the capacity of such a methodology to measure the way in which people travel through defined multi-levels of typologies of public urban space. The research uses the case of Hong Kong as a dense city that is three-dimensionally activated in terms of its public realm, not just at street level, but also via below ground subways and upper-level walkways, public and quasi-public spaces. This includes the three-dimensional volumetric assessment of public and quasi-public space typologies within a highly dense city. For the purpose of the study, a characterization and term definition of these spaces has been further developed: “Junctions”, “Landmarks”, “Intersections”, “Districts”, “Passages” and “Lobbies” (both outdoor and indoor) based on Lynch’s 5 main key elements (District, landmark, path, edges, node). The results obtained using AI prove to be more robust and rational than those based on a more limited range of tools, evidencing that using AI can offer operational opportunities for better understanding of morphological and typological evolution within the vertical and volumetric built urban fabric.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2024.18841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2024.18841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

适当的城市密度是可持续城市结构的重要组成部分。然而,在测量已建成的城市结构以及人们如何穿行和使用城市结构时,很难确定适用的测量工具。为了确定能够最好地描述这种结构和运动的变量,本文提出了一种来自人工智能(AI)领域的多变量分析方法。本文的主要目的是证明人工智能作为一种不断发展的城市形态研究方法的能力,特别是评估这种方法在测量人们通过已定义的多层次城市公共空间类型的方式时的能力。这项研究以香港为例,香港是一个人口密集的城市,其公共空间不仅在街道层面,还通过地下隧道和上层人行道、公共空间和准公共空间进行三维活动。这包括对高密度城市中的公共和准公共空间类型进行三维容积评估。为了研究的目的,还进一步制定了这些空间的特征和术语定义:根据林奇的 5 个主要关键要素(区域、地标、路径、边缘、节点),对这些空间的 "路口"、"地标"、"交叉路口"、"区域"、"通道 "和 "大厅"(包括室外和室内)进行了定义。使用人工智能得出的结果比使用范围更有限的工具得出的结果更可靠、更合理,这证明使用人工智能可以为更好地理解垂直和体积城市建筑结构中的形态和类型演变提供操作机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVOLVING RESEARCH METHOD IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL AND VOLUMETRIC URBAN MORPHOLOGY OF A HIGHLY DENSE CITY: ASSESSING PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC SPACE TYPOLOGIES
An appropriate urban density is a vital part of a sustainable urban fabric. However, when it comes to measuring the built urban fabric and how people walk through it and use, a difficulty has been observed in defining applicable measurement tools. With the intention of identifying the variables that will allow the best characterization of this fabric and movement, a multi-variable analysis methodology from the field of artificial intelligence (AI) is proposed. The main objective of this paper is to prove the capacity of AI as an evolving research method in urban morphology and specifically to evaluate the capacity of such a methodology to measure the way in which people travel through defined multi-levels of typologies of public urban space. The research uses the case of Hong Kong as a dense city that is three-dimensionally activated in terms of its public realm, not just at street level, but also via below ground subways and upper-level walkways, public and quasi-public spaces. This includes the three-dimensional volumetric assessment of public and quasi-public space typologies within a highly dense city. For the purpose of the study, a characterization and term definition of these spaces has been further developed: “Junctions”, “Landmarks”, “Intersections”, “Districts”, “Passages” and “Lobbies” (both outdoor and indoor) based on Lynch’s 5 main key elements (District, landmark, path, edges, node). The results obtained using AI prove to be more robust and rational than those based on a more limited range of tools, evidencing that using AI can offer operational opportunities for better understanding of morphological and typological evolution within the vertical and volumetric built urban fabric.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Architecture and Urbanism publishes original research on all aspects of urban architecture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信