顺式阿曲库铵与阿曲库铵神经肌肉阻断术的恢复曲线和血流动力学效应的变异性比较

A. Siddiqui, S. Raza, S. Shafqat, S. Zehra, S. Bozdar, MN Munir
{"title":"顺式阿曲库铵与阿曲库铵神经肌肉阻断术的恢复曲线和血流动力学效应的变异性比较","authors":"A. Siddiqui, S. Raza, S. Shafqat, S. Zehra, S. Bozdar, MN Munir","doi":"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Main Operation Theatre of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) in Karachi to compare the recovery profile and hemodynamic effects of cisatracurium and atracurium among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study was conducted from 20th July 2019 to 19th January 2020 and included 68 patients aged between 20 to 50 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Patients with a history of allergy to the study drugs, neuromuscular, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic diseases, smoking, pregnancy, or breastfeeding, and those on preoperative medication such as antipsychotics, aminoglycosides, steroids, or neuroleptics were excluded. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1, comprising 34 patients, cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg) was administered, whereas in Group 2, also with 34 patients, atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) was given. Neuromuscular blocking agents were administered three minutes before intubation. The primary outcomes measured were the recovery profile and hemodynamic effects. In Group 1 (cisatracurium), the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded as 98.40 ± 8.02 mmHg, which increased to 112.20 ± 8.88 mmHg before intubation, resulting in a change of 13.56 ± 5.59 mmHg. In contrast, in Group 2 (atracurium), the baseline MAP was 94.10 ± 7.91 mmHg, which rose to 109.07 ± 8.35 mmHg before intubation, indicating a change of 16.50 ± 4.38 mmHg. The study concluded that cisatracurium is more effective in exhibiting neuromuscular blocking properties than atracurium in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":504575,"journal":{"name":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF THE VARIABILITY OF RECOVERY PROFILE AND HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE WITH CISATRACURIUM VERSUS ATRACURIUM\",\"authors\":\"A. Siddiqui, S. Raza, S. Shafqat, S. Zehra, S. Bozdar, MN Munir\",\"doi\":\"10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Main Operation Theatre of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) in Karachi to compare the recovery profile and hemodynamic effects of cisatracurium and atracurium among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study was conducted from 20th July 2019 to 19th January 2020 and included 68 patients aged between 20 to 50 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Patients with a history of allergy to the study drugs, neuromuscular, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic diseases, smoking, pregnancy, or breastfeeding, and those on preoperative medication such as antipsychotics, aminoglycosides, steroids, or neuroleptics were excluded. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1, comprising 34 patients, cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg) was administered, whereas in Group 2, also with 34 patients, atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) was given. Neuromuscular blocking agents were administered three minutes before intubation. The primary outcomes measured were the recovery profile and hemodynamic effects. In Group 1 (cisatracurium), the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded as 98.40 ± 8.02 mmHg, which increased to 112.20 ± 8.88 mmHg before intubation, resulting in a change of 13.56 ± 5.59 mmHg. In contrast, in Group 2 (atracurium), the baseline MAP was 94.10 ± 7.91 mmHg, which rose to 109.07 ± 8.35 mmHg before intubation, indicating a change of 16.50 ± 4.38 mmHg. The study concluded that cisatracurium is more effective in exhibiting neuromuscular blocking properties than atracurium in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡拉奇真纳研究生医疗中心(JPMC)主手术室进行了一项随机对照试验,以比较顺阿曲库铵和阿曲库铵对接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的恢复情况和血流动力学影响。该研究于 2019 年 7 月 20 日至 2020 年 1 月 19 日进行,纳入了 68 名在全身麻醉下接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的 20 至 50 岁患者。有研究药物过敏史、神经肌肉疾病、肺病、肾病或肝病、吸烟、妊娠或哺乳以及术前服用抗精神病药物、氨基糖苷类药物、类固醇或神经抑制剂等药物的患者被排除在外。患者被随机分为两组。第一组有 34 名患者,使用顺卡曲铵(0.2 毫克/千克);第二组也有 34 名患者,使用阿曲库铵(0.5 毫克/千克)。插管前三分钟使用神经肌肉阻断剂。测量的主要结果是恢复情况和血液动力学效应。第 1 组(顺阿曲库铵)的基线平均动脉压(MAP)记录为 98.40 ± 8.02 mmHg,插管前升至 112.20 ± 8.88 mmHg,变化幅度为 13.56 ± 5.59 mmHg。相比之下,第 2 组(阿曲库铵)的基线 MAP 为 94.10 ± 7.91 mmHg,插管前升至 109.07 ± 8.35 mmHg,变化幅度为 16.50 ± 4.38 mmHg。研究得出结论,在全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中,顺式阿曲库铵比阿曲库铵更有效地表现出神经肌肉阻滞特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF THE VARIABILITY OF RECOVERY PROFILE AND HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE WITH CISATRACURIUM VERSUS ATRACURIUM
A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Main Operation Theatre of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) in Karachi to compare the recovery profile and hemodynamic effects of cisatracurium and atracurium among patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study was conducted from 20th July 2019 to 19th January 2020 and included 68 patients aged between 20 to 50 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Patients with a history of allergy to the study drugs, neuromuscular, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic diseases, smoking, pregnancy, or breastfeeding, and those on preoperative medication such as antipsychotics, aminoglycosides, steroids, or neuroleptics were excluded. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1, comprising 34 patients, cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg) was administered, whereas in Group 2, also with 34 patients, atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) was given. Neuromuscular blocking agents were administered three minutes before intubation. The primary outcomes measured were the recovery profile and hemodynamic effects. In Group 1 (cisatracurium), the baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) was recorded as 98.40 ± 8.02 mmHg, which increased to 112.20 ± 8.88 mmHg before intubation, resulting in a change of 13.56 ± 5.59 mmHg. In contrast, in Group 2 (atracurium), the baseline MAP was 94.10 ± 7.91 mmHg, which rose to 109.07 ± 8.35 mmHg before intubation, indicating a change of 16.50 ± 4.38 mmHg. The study concluded that cisatracurium is more effective in exhibiting neuromuscular blocking properties than atracurium in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信