索托拉西布(Lumacre)

Cadth
{"title":"索托拉西布(Lumacre)","authors":"Cadth","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nCADTH recommends that public drug plans should not reimburse Lumakras for the treatment of adult patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) G12C-mutated locally advanced (not amenable to curative therapy) or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. \nThe clinical evidence reviewed by CADTH was insufficient to conclude that treatment with Lumakras results in a clinically meaningful delay in disease progression compared with docetaxel. It was impossible to assess whether treatment with Lumakras would prolong survival relative to docetaxel. \nPatients identified the need for more effective treatments that delay disease progression, prolong survival, control disease symptoms, improve quality of life, reduce side effects, and offer an oral route of administration. While Lumakras offers an oral route of administration, it is not clear whether Lumakras meets the other needs identified by patients. \n","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"53 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sotorasib (Lumakras)\",\"authors\":\"Cadth\",\"doi\":\"10.51731/cjht.2024.857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nCADTH recommends that public drug plans should not reimburse Lumakras for the treatment of adult patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) G12C-mutated locally advanced (not amenable to curative therapy) or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. \\nThe clinical evidence reviewed by CADTH was insufficient to conclude that treatment with Lumakras results in a clinically meaningful delay in disease progression compared with docetaxel. It was impossible to assess whether treatment with Lumakras would prolong survival relative to docetaxel. \\nPatients identified the need for more effective treatments that delay disease progression, prolong survival, control disease symptoms, improve quality of life, reduce side effects, and offer an oral route of administration. While Lumakras offers an oral route of administration, it is not clear whether Lumakras meets the other needs identified by patients. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":9437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CADTH 建议,公费医疗计划不应报销 Lumakras 用于治疗至少接受过一次系统治疗的 Kirsten 大鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物 (KRAS) G12C 突变局部晚期(不适合根治性治疗)或转移性非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 成年患者的费用。CADTH审查的临床证据不足以得出结论认为,与多西他赛相比,Lumakras的治疗会导致有临床意义的疾病进展延迟。无法评估与多西他赛相比,使用Lumakras治疗是否会延长患者的生存期。患者认为需要更有效的治疗方法,以延缓疾病进展、延长生存期、控制疾病症状、改善生活质量、减少副作用并提供口服给药途径。虽然 Lumakras 提供口服给药途径,但目前尚不清楚 Lumakras 是否能满足患者提出的其他需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sotorasib (Lumakras)
CADTH recommends that public drug plans should not reimburse Lumakras for the treatment of adult patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) G12C-mutated locally advanced (not amenable to curative therapy) or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. The clinical evidence reviewed by CADTH was insufficient to conclude that treatment with Lumakras results in a clinically meaningful delay in disease progression compared with docetaxel. It was impossible to assess whether treatment with Lumakras would prolong survival relative to docetaxel. Patients identified the need for more effective treatments that delay disease progression, prolong survival, control disease symptoms, improve quality of life, reduce side effects, and offer an oral route of administration. While Lumakras offers an oral route of administration, it is not clear whether Lumakras meets the other needs identified by patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信