卢因九十年后:家庭主义和依恋风格在 21 个国家/地区的社会网络特征中的作用

Xian Zhao, Omri Gillath, I. Alonso‐Arbiol, Amina Abubakar, Byron G. Adams, Frédérique Autin, A. Brassard, Rodrigo J. Carcedo, Or Catz, Cecilia Cheng, Tamlin S. Conner, Tasuku Igarashi, Konstantinos Kafetsios, Shanmukh Kamble, G. Karantzas, Rafael Emilio Mendía-Monterroso, João M. Moreira, Tobias Nolte, W. Ruch, Sandra Sebre, Angela Suryani, S. Tagliabue, Qi Xu, Fang Zhang
{"title":"卢因九十年后:家庭主义和依恋风格在 21 个国家/地区的社会网络特征中的作用","authors":"Xian Zhao, Omri Gillath, I. Alonso‐Arbiol, Amina Abubakar, Byron G. Adams, Frédérique Autin, A. Brassard, Rodrigo J. Carcedo, Or Catz, Cecilia Cheng, Tamlin S. Conner, Tasuku Igarashi, Konstantinos Kafetsios, Shanmukh Kamble, G. Karantzas, Rafael Emilio Mendía-Monterroso, João M. Moreira, Tobias Nolte, W. Ruch, Sandra Sebre, Angela Suryani, S. Tagliabue, Qi Xu, Fang Zhang","doi":"10.1177/02654075241237939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on the literature on person-culture fit, we investigated how culture (assessed as national-level familism), personality (tapped by attachment styles) and their interactions predicted social network characteristics in 21 nations/areas ( N = 2977). Multilevel mixed modeling showed that familism predicted smaller network size but greater density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Attachment avoidance predicted smaller network size, and lower density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Attachment anxiety was related to lower density and tie strength. Familism enhanced avoidance’s association with network size and reduced its association with density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Familism also enhanced anxiety’s association with network size, tie strength, and multiplexity. These findings contribute to theory building on attachment and culture, highlight the significance of culture by personality interaction for the understanding of social networks, and call attention to the importance of sampling multiple countries.","PeriodicalId":508458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ninety years after Lewin: The role of familism and attachment style in social networks characteristics across 21 nations/areas\",\"authors\":\"Xian Zhao, Omri Gillath, I. Alonso‐Arbiol, Amina Abubakar, Byron G. Adams, Frédérique Autin, A. Brassard, Rodrigo J. Carcedo, Or Catz, Cecilia Cheng, Tamlin S. Conner, Tasuku Igarashi, Konstantinos Kafetsios, Shanmukh Kamble, G. Karantzas, Rafael Emilio Mendía-Monterroso, João M. Moreira, Tobias Nolte, W. Ruch, Sandra Sebre, Angela Suryani, S. Tagliabue, Qi Xu, Fang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02654075241237939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on the literature on person-culture fit, we investigated how culture (assessed as national-level familism), personality (tapped by attachment styles) and their interactions predicted social network characteristics in 21 nations/areas ( N = 2977). Multilevel mixed modeling showed that familism predicted smaller network size but greater density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Attachment avoidance predicted smaller network size, and lower density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Attachment anxiety was related to lower density and tie strength. Familism enhanced avoidance’s association with network size and reduced its association with density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Familism also enhanced anxiety’s association with network size, tie strength, and multiplexity. These findings contribute to theory building on attachment and culture, highlight the significance of culture by personality interaction for the understanding of social networks, and call attention to the importance of sampling multiple countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241237939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Personal Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241237939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

借鉴有关个人-文化契合度的文献,我们研究了文化(以国家级家庭主义为评估标准)、人格(以依恋风格为标准)及其相互作用如何预测 21 个国家/地区(N = 2977)的社会网络特征。多层次混合模型显示,家庭主义预示着较小的网络规模,但更大的密度、联系强度和多重性。依恋回避预示着网络规模较小,密度、联系强度和多重性较低。依恋焦虑与较低的密度和联系强度有关。家庭主义增强了回避与网络规模的关联,降低了其与密度、联系强度和多重性的关联。家庭主义也增强了焦虑与网络规模、联系强度和多重性的关联。这些发现有助于依恋与文化理论的建立,强调了文化与人格互动对理解社会网络的重要意义,并提醒人们注意对多个国家进行抽样调查的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ninety years after Lewin: The role of familism and attachment style in social networks characteristics across 21 nations/areas
Drawing on the literature on person-culture fit, we investigated how culture (assessed as national-level familism), personality (tapped by attachment styles) and their interactions predicted social network characteristics in 21 nations/areas ( N = 2977). Multilevel mixed modeling showed that familism predicted smaller network size but greater density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Attachment avoidance predicted smaller network size, and lower density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Attachment anxiety was related to lower density and tie strength. Familism enhanced avoidance’s association with network size and reduced its association with density, tie strength, and multiplexity. Familism also enhanced anxiety’s association with network size, tie strength, and multiplexity. These findings contribute to theory building on attachment and culture, highlight the significance of culture by personality interaction for the understanding of social networks, and call attention to the importance of sampling multiple countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信