LOK-TEST 和 CAPO-TEST 拉伸试验,用于检测现浇混凝土强度

IF 0.7 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Claus Germann Petersen
{"title":"LOK-TEST 和 CAPO-TEST 拉伸试验,用于检测现浇混凝土强度","authors":"Claus Germann Petersen","doi":"10.3233/brs-240220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the test systems for in-place concrete strength available today, two measure the in-place physical strength, pullout, and cores. Both systems are dealt with in detail in this paper, the pullout systems named LOK-TEST/CAPO-TEST (ASTM C900-19) and coring (ASTM C42/42M-18). Testing in-situ with accurate test systems will reveal effects on the final strength from a potential mix’s over transportation, pumping, consolidation, compaction, and curing. With the LOK-TEST system testing of the pre-installed inserts takes 4–5 minutes each, easily and with only one small suitcase brought along. The CAPO-TEST, originally designed to supplement the LOK-TEST, takes 15–20 minutes for each test to be performed anywhere on a structure without pre-installed inserts. No large holes are left in the structure from coring and thinner elements may be tested without weakening them structurally. The pullout test provides accurately the In-Place Strength without testing cores and the duration is about 15 minutes compared to 3–4 days for coring correctly cured. General robust correlations to strength of standard specimens exist no matter what parameter is considered for normal concrete, even for carbonation of the surface layer. With the systems the cover layer protecting the reinforcement may be checked efficiently and quickly, not at least in areas with dense reinforcement or on slim structures. Bad curing conditions are revealed and the consequences in terms of reduced service life for presence of chlorides or carbonation may be estimated swiftly. This paper is benchmarking 50 years of successful in-situ concrete strength measurements, from studies of the failure mechanism and laboratory/on-site correlations to full scale testing of structures in Europe, Scandinavia, and Canada. Six testing cases with emphasis on pullout and cores are illustrating different applications: Case 1. Production testing at the Great Belt Link, Denmark. Case 2. Service life of bridge pier, Great Belt Link, Denmark. Case 3. Curing of the cover layer evaluated by pullout and conductivity, Denmark. Case 4. Strength testing with CAPO-TEST for further loading of old bridges, Poland. Case 5. In-Situ compressive strength testing of quarantined precast concrete tunnel lining segments using CAPO-TEST, UK. Case 6. Safe and early loading with LOK-TEST, Canada. Other cases are given on www.NDTitans.com","PeriodicalId":43279,"journal":{"name":"Bridge Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LOK-TEST and CAPO-TEST pullout for in-situ concrete strength\",\"authors\":\"Claus Germann Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/brs-240220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the test systems for in-place concrete strength available today, two measure the in-place physical strength, pullout, and cores. Both systems are dealt with in detail in this paper, the pullout systems named LOK-TEST/CAPO-TEST (ASTM C900-19) and coring (ASTM C42/42M-18). Testing in-situ with accurate test systems will reveal effects on the final strength from a potential mix’s over transportation, pumping, consolidation, compaction, and curing. With the LOK-TEST system testing of the pre-installed inserts takes 4–5 minutes each, easily and with only one small suitcase brought along. The CAPO-TEST, originally designed to supplement the LOK-TEST, takes 15–20 minutes for each test to be performed anywhere on a structure without pre-installed inserts. No large holes are left in the structure from coring and thinner elements may be tested without weakening them structurally. The pullout test provides accurately the In-Place Strength without testing cores and the duration is about 15 minutes compared to 3–4 days for coring correctly cured. General robust correlations to strength of standard specimens exist no matter what parameter is considered for normal concrete, even for carbonation of the surface layer. With the systems the cover layer protecting the reinforcement may be checked efficiently and quickly, not at least in areas with dense reinforcement or on slim structures. Bad curing conditions are revealed and the consequences in terms of reduced service life for presence of chlorides or carbonation may be estimated swiftly. This paper is benchmarking 50 years of successful in-situ concrete strength measurements, from studies of the failure mechanism and laboratory/on-site correlations to full scale testing of structures in Europe, Scandinavia, and Canada. Six testing cases with emphasis on pullout and cores are illustrating different applications: Case 1. Production testing at the Great Belt Link, Denmark. Case 2. Service life of bridge pier, Great Belt Link, Denmark. Case 3. Curing of the cover layer evaluated by pullout and conductivity, Denmark. Case 4. Strength testing with CAPO-TEST for further loading of old bridges, Poland. Case 5. In-Situ compressive strength testing of quarantined precast concrete tunnel lining segments using CAPO-TEST, UK. Case 6. Safe and early loading with LOK-TEST, Canada. Other cases are given on www.NDTitans.com\",\"PeriodicalId\":43279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bridge Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bridge Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/brs-240220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bridge Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/brs-240220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在目前可用的现场混凝土强度测试系统中,有两种可以测量现场物理强度,一种是拉拔,另一种是取芯。本文将详细介绍这两种系统,即名为 LOK-TEST/CAPO-TEST (ASTM C900-19)和取芯(ASTM C42/42M-18)的拉拔系统。使用精确的测试系统进行原位测试,可以揭示潜在混合料在过度运输、泵送、固结、压实和固化过程中对最终强度的影响。使用 LOK-TEST 系统对预装插入件进行测试,每个插入件只需 4-5 分钟,只需携带一个小手提箱即可轻松完成。CAPO-TEST 最初是为补充 LOK-TEST 而设计的,每次测试需要 15-20 分钟,可在没有预装嵌件的任何结构上进行。取芯时不会在结构上留下大孔,可以对较薄的构件进行测试,而不会削弱其结构。拉拔测试无需测试岩芯即可准确提供就地强度,测试时间约为 15 分钟,而正确固化的岩芯测试则需要 3-4 天。无论考虑普通混凝土的任何参数,甚至是表层的碳化,标准试样的强度都存在普遍的稳健相关性。使用该系统可以高效、快速地检测保护钢筋的覆盖层,尤其是在钢筋密集区域或细长结构上。不良的固化条件会被暴露出来,氯化物或碳化的存在会缩短使用寿命,其后果也会被迅速估算出来。本文以 50 年来成功的现浇混凝土强度测量为基准,从失效机理和实验室/现场相关性研究,到欧洲、斯堪的纳维亚半岛和加拿大结构的全面测试。六个测试案例重点介绍了拉拔和取芯的不同应用:案例 1.丹麦 Great Belt Link 的生产测试。案例 2.丹麦 Great Belt Link 桥墩的使用寿命。案例 3.通过拉拔和导电性评估覆盖层的固化情况,丹麦。案例 4.使用 CAPO-TEST 进行强度测试以进一步加载旧桥,波兰。案例 5.使用 CAPO-TEST 对经过检疫的预制混凝土隧道衬砌段进行原位抗压强度测试,英国。案例 6.使用 LOK-TEST 进行安全和早期加载,加拿大。其他案例见 www.NDTitans.com。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LOK-TEST and CAPO-TEST pullout for in-situ concrete strength
Among the test systems for in-place concrete strength available today, two measure the in-place physical strength, pullout, and cores. Both systems are dealt with in detail in this paper, the pullout systems named LOK-TEST/CAPO-TEST (ASTM C900-19) and coring (ASTM C42/42M-18). Testing in-situ with accurate test systems will reveal effects on the final strength from a potential mix’s over transportation, pumping, consolidation, compaction, and curing. With the LOK-TEST system testing of the pre-installed inserts takes 4–5 minutes each, easily and with only one small suitcase brought along. The CAPO-TEST, originally designed to supplement the LOK-TEST, takes 15–20 minutes for each test to be performed anywhere on a structure without pre-installed inserts. No large holes are left in the structure from coring and thinner elements may be tested without weakening them structurally. The pullout test provides accurately the In-Place Strength without testing cores and the duration is about 15 minutes compared to 3–4 days for coring correctly cured. General robust correlations to strength of standard specimens exist no matter what parameter is considered for normal concrete, even for carbonation of the surface layer. With the systems the cover layer protecting the reinforcement may be checked efficiently and quickly, not at least in areas with dense reinforcement or on slim structures. Bad curing conditions are revealed and the consequences in terms of reduced service life for presence of chlorides or carbonation may be estimated swiftly. This paper is benchmarking 50 years of successful in-situ concrete strength measurements, from studies of the failure mechanism and laboratory/on-site correlations to full scale testing of structures in Europe, Scandinavia, and Canada. Six testing cases with emphasis on pullout and cores are illustrating different applications: Case 1. Production testing at the Great Belt Link, Denmark. Case 2. Service life of bridge pier, Great Belt Link, Denmark. Case 3. Curing of the cover layer evaluated by pullout and conductivity, Denmark. Case 4. Strength testing with CAPO-TEST for further loading of old bridges, Poland. Case 5. In-Situ compressive strength testing of quarantined precast concrete tunnel lining segments using CAPO-TEST, UK. Case 6. Safe and early loading with LOK-TEST, Canada. Other cases are given on www.NDTitans.com
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bridge Structures
Bridge Structures CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信