{"title":"伊拉克油田(M)地层渗透率预测的高级机器学习应用","authors":"Noor alhuda K. Mohammed, G. Farman","doi":"10.52716/jprs.v14i1.777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Permeability estimation is a vital step in reservoir engineering due to its effect on reservoir's characterization, planning for perforations, and economic efficiency of the reservoirs. The core and well-logging data are the main sources of permeability measuring and calculating respectively. There are multiple methods to predict permeability such as classic, empirical, and geostatistical methods. In this research, two statistical approaches have been applied and compared for permeability prediction: Multiple Linear Regression and Random Forest, given the (M) reservoir interval in the (BH) Oil Field in the northern part of Iraq. The dataset was separated into two subsets: Training and Testing in order to cross-validate the accuracy and the performance of the algorithms. The random forest algorithm was the most accurate method leading to lowest Root Mean Square Prediction Error (RMSPE) and highest Adjusted R-Square than multiple linear regression algorithm for both training and testing subset respectively. Thus, random Forest algorithm is more trustable in permeability prediction in non-cored intervals and its distribution in the geological model.","PeriodicalId":16710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Machine Learning application for Permeability Prediction for (M) Formation in an Iraqi Oil Field\",\"authors\":\"Noor alhuda K. Mohammed, G. Farman\",\"doi\":\"10.52716/jprs.v14i1.777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Permeability estimation is a vital step in reservoir engineering due to its effect on reservoir's characterization, planning for perforations, and economic efficiency of the reservoirs. The core and well-logging data are the main sources of permeability measuring and calculating respectively. There are multiple methods to predict permeability such as classic, empirical, and geostatistical methods. In this research, two statistical approaches have been applied and compared for permeability prediction: Multiple Linear Regression and Random Forest, given the (M) reservoir interval in the (BH) Oil Field in the northern part of Iraq. The dataset was separated into two subsets: Training and Testing in order to cross-validate the accuracy and the performance of the algorithms. The random forest algorithm was the most accurate method leading to lowest Root Mean Square Prediction Error (RMSPE) and highest Adjusted R-Square than multiple linear regression algorithm for both training and testing subset respectively. Thus, random Forest algorithm is more trustable in permeability prediction in non-cored intervals and its distribution in the geological model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v14i1.777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v14i1.777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
渗透率估算是油藏工程中的一个重要步骤,因为它对油藏的特征描述、射孔规划和油藏的经济效益都有影响。岩心和测井数据分别是渗透率测量和计算的主要来源。预测渗透率有多种方法,如经典方法、经验方法和地质统计方法。在本研究中,有两种统计方法被用于渗透率预测并进行了比较:多重线性回归法和随机森林法。数据集分为两个子集:为了交叉验证算法的准确性和性能,将数据集分为两个子集:训练集和测试集。与多元线性回归算法相比,随机森林算法是最准确的方法,在训练子集和测试子集上的均方根预测误差(RMSPE)最小,调整 R 平方最高。因此,随机森林算法在预测非刻蚀区间的渗透率及其在地质模型中的分布方面更值得信赖。
Advanced Machine Learning application for Permeability Prediction for (M) Formation in an Iraqi Oil Field
Permeability estimation is a vital step in reservoir engineering due to its effect on reservoir's characterization, planning for perforations, and economic efficiency of the reservoirs. The core and well-logging data are the main sources of permeability measuring and calculating respectively. There are multiple methods to predict permeability such as classic, empirical, and geostatistical methods. In this research, two statistical approaches have been applied and compared for permeability prediction: Multiple Linear Regression and Random Forest, given the (M) reservoir interval in the (BH) Oil Field in the northern part of Iraq. The dataset was separated into two subsets: Training and Testing in order to cross-validate the accuracy and the performance of the algorithms. The random forest algorithm was the most accurate method leading to lowest Root Mean Square Prediction Error (RMSPE) and highest Adjusted R-Square than multiple linear regression algorithm for both training and testing subset respectively. Thus, random Forest algorithm is more trustable in permeability prediction in non-cored intervals and its distribution in the geological model.