狼疮临床试验注册决策辅助工具的开发:一项试点研究

Leila Khalili, Rita Kukafka, Julia Weiner, Sean Inzerillo, Wei Tang, L. Geraldino-Pardilla, Nancyanne Schmidt, Yevgeniyia Gartshteyn, Kathleen Alvarez, A. Askanase
{"title":"狼疮临床试验注册决策辅助工具的开发:一项试点研究","authors":"Leila Khalili, Rita Kukafka, Julia Weiner, Sean Inzerillo, Wei Tang, L. Geraldino-Pardilla, Nancyanne Schmidt, Yevgeniyia Gartshteyn, Kathleen Alvarez, A. Askanase","doi":"10.3389/flupu.2024.1373534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this pilot study, we describe the development of a patient-centered Decision Aid (DA) for participation of SLE clinical trials called “The Lupus Clinical Trials Enrollment DA”.A draft DA was designed by a development working group using a collaborative, iterative process using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) guidelines. The approved draft DA was then pilot tested and refined using semi structured interview with 10 lupus providers and 12 SLE patients. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Interviews/surveys were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Responses on usefulness were accumulated, and mean usefulness scores were calculated. Feedback from the semi-structured interviews were categorized into several themes as outlined in the results section.The definition of treatments, side effects of each option, and expected improvement from each option was outlined. 90% of providers and 91.7% of patients reported that the definition of SOC treatment was clear. Additionally, the expected improvement for SOC (90% of providers, 100% of patients), clinical trial drug (70%, 91.6%), and placebo (70%, 100%) were noted to be clear. Side effects of SOC (80%, 100%), clinical trial drug treatment (80%, 100%), placebo (90%, 100%), were also noted to be clear. 100% of providers and patients thought that the figure outlining pros/cons of participating in clinical trials was appropriate. The mean usefulness scores for the DA were 4.45/5 for providers and 4.67/5 for patients.These data demonstrate that both patients and providers confirm that the newly developed The Lupus Clinical Trials Enrollment DA is useful and easy to use. Qualitative feedback from providers demonstrated concern that aspects of the DA, such as expected improvement and side effects might be unclear to patients; however, patients did not express the same concern in either the quantitative or qualitative feedback.","PeriodicalId":94014,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in lupus","volume":" 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of The Lupus Clinical Trials Enrollment Decision Aid: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Leila Khalili, Rita Kukafka, Julia Weiner, Sean Inzerillo, Wei Tang, L. Geraldino-Pardilla, Nancyanne Schmidt, Yevgeniyia Gartshteyn, Kathleen Alvarez, A. Askanase\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/flupu.2024.1373534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this pilot study, we describe the development of a patient-centered Decision Aid (DA) for participation of SLE clinical trials called “The Lupus Clinical Trials Enrollment DA”.A draft DA was designed by a development working group using a collaborative, iterative process using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) guidelines. The approved draft DA was then pilot tested and refined using semi structured interview with 10 lupus providers and 12 SLE patients. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Interviews/surveys were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Responses on usefulness were accumulated, and mean usefulness scores were calculated. Feedback from the semi-structured interviews were categorized into several themes as outlined in the results section.The definition of treatments, side effects of each option, and expected improvement from each option was outlined. 90% of providers and 91.7% of patients reported that the definition of SOC treatment was clear. Additionally, the expected improvement for SOC (90% of providers, 100% of patients), clinical trial drug (70%, 91.6%), and placebo (70%, 100%) were noted to be clear. Side effects of SOC (80%, 100%), clinical trial drug treatment (80%, 100%), placebo (90%, 100%), were also noted to be clear. 100% of providers and patients thought that the figure outlining pros/cons of participating in clinical trials was appropriate. The mean usefulness scores for the DA were 4.45/5 for providers and 4.67/5 for patients.These data demonstrate that both patients and providers confirm that the newly developed The Lupus Clinical Trials Enrollment DA is useful and easy to use. Qualitative feedback from providers demonstrated concern that aspects of the DA, such as expected improvement and side effects might be unclear to patients; however, patients did not express the same concern in either the quantitative or qualitative feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in lupus\",\"volume\":\" 49\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in lupus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/flupu.2024.1373534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in lupus","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/flupu.2024.1373534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项试点研究中,我们介绍了一种以患者为中心的决策辅助工具(Decision Aid,DA)的开发情况,该工具用于参与系统性红斑狼疮临床试验,名为 "狼疮临床试验注册DA"。DA草案是由一个开发工作组设计的,该工作组采用了国际患者决策辅助工具标准(International Patient Decision Aid Standards,IPDAS)指南,通过合作、迭代的方式进行设计。经批准的DA草案随后进行了试点测试,并通过与10名狼疮服务提供者和12名系统性红斑狼疮患者进行半结构化访谈对其进行了改进。对描述性统计进行了计算。访谈/调查进行到主题饱和为止。对有用性的回答被累积起来,并计算出有用性的平均分。半结构式访谈的反馈意见被归类为几个主题,如结果部分所述。90% 的医疗服务提供者和 91.7% 的患者表示,SOC 治疗的定义是明确的。此外,90% 的医疗服务提供者和 91.6% 的患者指出,SOC(90% 的医疗服务提供者,100% 的患者)、临床试验药物(70%,91.6%)和安慰剂(70%,100%)的预期改善是明确的。此外,SOC(80%,100%)、临床试验药物治疗(80%,100%)和安慰剂(90%,100%)的副作用也很明确。100%的医疗服务提供者和患者认为概述参与临床试验利弊的图表是恰当的。这些数据表明,患者和医疗服务提供者都认为新开发的狼疮临床试验注册DA非常有用且易于使用。来自医疗服务提供者的定性反馈表明,他们担心患者可能不清楚DA的某些方面,如预期改善和副作用;但是,患者在定量或定性反馈中都没有表达出同样的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of The Lupus Clinical Trials Enrollment Decision Aid: a pilot study
In this pilot study, we describe the development of a patient-centered Decision Aid (DA) for participation of SLE clinical trials called “The Lupus Clinical Trials Enrollment DA”.A draft DA was designed by a development working group using a collaborative, iterative process using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) guidelines. The approved draft DA was then pilot tested and refined using semi structured interview with 10 lupus providers and 12 SLE patients. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Interviews/surveys were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. Responses on usefulness were accumulated, and mean usefulness scores were calculated. Feedback from the semi-structured interviews were categorized into several themes as outlined in the results section.The definition of treatments, side effects of each option, and expected improvement from each option was outlined. 90% of providers and 91.7% of patients reported that the definition of SOC treatment was clear. Additionally, the expected improvement for SOC (90% of providers, 100% of patients), clinical trial drug (70%, 91.6%), and placebo (70%, 100%) were noted to be clear. Side effects of SOC (80%, 100%), clinical trial drug treatment (80%, 100%), placebo (90%, 100%), were also noted to be clear. 100% of providers and patients thought that the figure outlining pros/cons of participating in clinical trials was appropriate. The mean usefulness scores for the DA were 4.45/5 for providers and 4.67/5 for patients.These data demonstrate that both patients and providers confirm that the newly developed The Lupus Clinical Trials Enrollment DA is useful and easy to use. Qualitative feedback from providers demonstrated concern that aspects of the DA, such as expected improvement and side effects might be unclear to patients; however, patients did not express the same concern in either the quantitative or qualitative feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信