{"title":"如何衡量生活水平?十九世纪欧洲的男性工资、非市场生产和家庭收入","authors":"J. Burnette","doi":"10.1111/ehr.13339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth‐century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non‐market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non‐market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.","PeriodicalId":505850,"journal":{"name":"The Economic History Review","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How not to measure the standard of living: Male wages, non‐market production and household income in nineteenth‐century Europe\",\"authors\":\"J. Burnette\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ehr.13339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth‐century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non‐market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non‐market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Economic History Review\",\"volume\":\" 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Economic History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然男性的实际工资可以用来衡量投入成本,但并不能准确衡量生活水平。本文利用 Le Play 及其同事收集的 19 世纪欧洲家庭的详细记录,证明了非市场生产对家庭消费的重要性。如果我们衡量包括非市场生产在内的所有来源的收入,英国在物质消费方面的优势仅为英国男性工资优势的一半左右。虽然英国男性工资高,但英国妻子工作较少,与欧洲大陆家庭相比,英国家庭更依赖于男户主的收入。
How not to measure the standard of living: Male wages, non‐market production and household income in nineteenth‐century Europe
While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth‐century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non‐market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non‐market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.