心脏病诊断的预测模型:分类器比较研究

Q2 Computer Science
Nidhi Agarwal, Deepakshi, J. Harikiran, Yampati Bhagya Lakshmi, Aylapogu Pramod Kumar, Elangovan Muniyandy, Amit Verma
{"title":"心脏病诊断的预测模型:分类器比较研究","authors":"Nidhi Agarwal, Deepakshi, J. Harikiran, Yampati Bhagya Lakshmi, Aylapogu Pramod Kumar, Elangovan Muniyandy, Amit Verma","doi":"10.4108/eetpht.10.5518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases, including heart disease, remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Timely and accurate diagnosis of heart disease is crucial for effective intervention and patient care. With the emergence of machine learning techniques, there is a growing interest in leveraging these methods to enhance diagnostic accuracy and predict disease outcomes. \nOBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the performance of three machine learning classifiers—Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbors in predicting heart disease based on patient attributes. \nMETHODS: In this study, we explore the application of three prominent machine learning classifiers—Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)—to predict the presence of heart disease based on a set of patient attributes. \nRESULTS: Using a dataset of 303 patient records with 14 attributes, including age, sex, and cholesterol levels, the data is pre-processed, scaled, and split into training and test sets. Each classifier is trained on the training set and evaluated on the test set. Results reveal that Naive Bayes and k-Nearest Neighbors classifiers outperform Logistic Regression in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). \nCONCLUSION: This study underscores the promising role of machine learning in medical diagnosis, showcasing the potential of Naive Bayes and k-Nearest Neighbors classifiers in improving heart disease prediction accuracy. Future work could explore advanced classifiers and feature selection techniques to enhance predictive accuracy and generalize findings to larger datasets.","PeriodicalId":36936,"journal":{"name":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Modelling for Heart Disease Diagnosis: A Comparative Study of Classifiers\",\"authors\":\"Nidhi Agarwal, Deepakshi, J. Harikiran, Yampati Bhagya Lakshmi, Aylapogu Pramod Kumar, Elangovan Muniyandy, Amit Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eetpht.10.5518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases, including heart disease, remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Timely and accurate diagnosis of heart disease is crucial for effective intervention and patient care. With the emergence of machine learning techniques, there is a growing interest in leveraging these methods to enhance diagnostic accuracy and predict disease outcomes. \\nOBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the performance of three machine learning classifiers—Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbors in predicting heart disease based on patient attributes. \\nMETHODS: In this study, we explore the application of three prominent machine learning classifiers—Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)—to predict the presence of heart disease based on a set of patient attributes. \\nRESULTS: Using a dataset of 303 patient records with 14 attributes, including age, sex, and cholesterol levels, the data is pre-processed, scaled, and split into training and test sets. Each classifier is trained on the training set and evaluated on the test set. Results reveal that Naive Bayes and k-Nearest Neighbors classifiers outperform Logistic Regression in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). \\nCONCLUSION: This study underscores the promising role of machine learning in medical diagnosis, showcasing the potential of Naive Bayes and k-Nearest Neighbors classifiers in improving heart disease prediction accuracy. Future work could explore advanced classifiers and feature selection techniques to enhance predictive accuracy and generalize findings to larger datasets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology\",\"volume\":\" 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.10.5518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.10.5518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:包括心脏病在内的心血管疾病仍然是全球发病率和死亡率的重要原因。及时准确地诊断心脏病对有效干预和患者护理至关重要。随着机器学习技术的出现,人们对利用这些方法提高诊断准确性和预测疾病结果的兴趣与日俱增。目的:本研究评估了三种机器学习分类器--Naive Bayes、Logistic Regression 和 k-Nearest Neighbors 在根据患者属性预测心脏病方面的性能。方法:在本研究中,我们探索了三种著名的机器学习分类器--自然贝叶斯、逻辑回归和 k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)--在根据一组患者属性预测是否患有心脏病方面的应用。结果:使用包含年龄、性别和胆固醇水平等 14 个属性的 303 份患者记录数据集,对数据进行预处理、缩放并分成训练集和测试集。每个分类器都在训练集上进行训练,并在测试集上进行评估。结果显示,Naive Bayes 和 k-Nearest Neighbors 分类器在准确度、精确度、召回率和 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)方面均优于 Logistic 回归。结论:本研究强调了机器学习在医疗诊断中的重要作用,展示了 Naive Bayes 和 k-Nearest Neighbors 分类器在提高心脏病预测准确性方面的潜力。未来的工作可以探索先进的分类器和特征选择技术,以提高预测准确性,并将研究结果推广到更大的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Modelling for Heart Disease Diagnosis: A Comparative Study of Classifiers
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases, including heart disease, remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Timely and accurate diagnosis of heart disease is crucial for effective intervention and patient care. With the emergence of machine learning techniques, there is a growing interest in leveraging these methods to enhance diagnostic accuracy and predict disease outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the performance of three machine learning classifiers—Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbors in predicting heart disease based on patient attributes. METHODS: In this study, we explore the application of three prominent machine learning classifiers—Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)—to predict the presence of heart disease based on a set of patient attributes. RESULTS: Using a dataset of 303 patient records with 14 attributes, including age, sex, and cholesterol levels, the data is pre-processed, scaled, and split into training and test sets. Each classifier is trained on the training set and evaluated on the test set. Results reveal that Naive Bayes and k-Nearest Neighbors classifiers outperform Logistic Regression in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the promising role of machine learning in medical diagnosis, showcasing the potential of Naive Bayes and k-Nearest Neighbors classifiers in improving heart disease prediction accuracy. Future work could explore advanced classifiers and feature selection techniques to enhance predictive accuracy and generalize findings to larger datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信