M. Komarov, N. K. Zhumabaev, A. Klimov, G. A. Arakelyan, A. V. Matveev, A. V. Khachaturyan, V. Y. Zemskova, V. Matveev
{"title":"肾细胞癌患者接受机器人辅助肾脏保留手术的初步经验","authors":"M. Komarov, N. K. Zhumabaev, A. Klimov, G. A. Arakelyan, A. V. Matveev, A. V. Khachaturyan, V. Y. Zemskova, V. Matveev","doi":"10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-1-109-119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose of the study: analysis of our experience in performing robotic-assisted nephron-sparing surgeries using the da robotic system. Material and Methods. The retrospective study included the first 37 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy from May 2020 to december 2022. Results. To assess the surgical outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, three parameters associated with trifecta achievement were analyzed. The trifecta was assessed according to the standard criteria, whereas the quadfecta, which in addition to the trifecta included preservation of >90 % of the glomerular filtration rate (calculated according to Cockroft–Gault) in the postoperative period (3–7 days), did not assess the stage of chronic renal failure one year after surgery, thus probably demonstrating the high percentage of its achievement (54.1 %). A positive surgical margin was observed in 1 (2.7 %) patients. Warm ischemia time of more than 25 minutes was used in 8 patients (21.6 %). Complications in the postoperative period (Clavien–dindo II and higher) were observed in 1 (2.7 %) patient. Trifecta and quadfecta rates were 78.4 % and 54.1 %, respectively. To analyze the surgeons’ experience, 37 renal cell cancer patients were divided into two subgroups with first 20 and subsequent robotic partial nephrectomies. There were no differences in gender, age and calculated RENAL value between 2 subgroups. depending on the surgeons’ experience, statistically significant differences in the duration of surgery (p=0.035) and blood loss during surgery (p=0.007) were found. Conclusion. Considering the extensive experience of surgeons in the field of laparoscopic surgery for tumors of the renal parenchyma, the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomies performed in 37 patients seem to be satisfactory and successful. The accumulated experience of surgeons after 20 robotic-assisted nephron-sparing surgeries makes it possible to significantly reduce surgery time and blood loss. The technique of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy requires further improvements.","PeriodicalId":21881,"journal":{"name":"Siberian journal of oncology","volume":" 50","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The initial experience of robot-assisted nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell cancer\",\"authors\":\"M. Komarov, N. K. Zhumabaev, A. Klimov, G. A. Arakelyan, A. V. Matveev, A. V. Khachaturyan, V. Y. Zemskova, V. Matveev\",\"doi\":\"10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-1-109-119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose of the study: analysis of our experience in performing robotic-assisted nephron-sparing surgeries using the da robotic system. Material and Methods. The retrospective study included the first 37 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy from May 2020 to december 2022. Results. To assess the surgical outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, three parameters associated with trifecta achievement were analyzed. The trifecta was assessed according to the standard criteria, whereas the quadfecta, which in addition to the trifecta included preservation of >90 % of the glomerular filtration rate (calculated according to Cockroft–Gault) in the postoperative period (3–7 days), did not assess the stage of chronic renal failure one year after surgery, thus probably demonstrating the high percentage of its achievement (54.1 %). A positive surgical margin was observed in 1 (2.7 %) patients. Warm ischemia time of more than 25 minutes was used in 8 patients (21.6 %). Complications in the postoperative period (Clavien–dindo II and higher) were observed in 1 (2.7 %) patient. Trifecta and quadfecta rates were 78.4 % and 54.1 %, respectively. To analyze the surgeons’ experience, 37 renal cell cancer patients were divided into two subgroups with first 20 and subsequent robotic partial nephrectomies. There were no differences in gender, age and calculated RENAL value between 2 subgroups. depending on the surgeons’ experience, statistically significant differences in the duration of surgery (p=0.035) and blood loss during surgery (p=0.007) were found. Conclusion. Considering the extensive experience of surgeons in the field of laparoscopic surgery for tumors of the renal parenchyma, the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomies performed in 37 patients seem to be satisfactory and successful. The accumulated experience of surgeons after 20 robotic-assisted nephron-sparing surgeries makes it possible to significantly reduce surgery time and blood loss. The technique of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy requires further improvements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Siberian journal of oncology\",\"volume\":\" 50\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Siberian journal of oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-1-109-119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siberian journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21294/1814-4861-2024-23-1-109-119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
The initial experience of robot-assisted nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell cancer
Purpose of the study: analysis of our experience in performing robotic-assisted nephron-sparing surgeries using the da robotic system. Material and Methods. The retrospective study included the first 37 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy from May 2020 to december 2022. Results. To assess the surgical outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, three parameters associated with trifecta achievement were analyzed. The trifecta was assessed according to the standard criteria, whereas the quadfecta, which in addition to the trifecta included preservation of >90 % of the glomerular filtration rate (calculated according to Cockroft–Gault) in the postoperative period (3–7 days), did not assess the stage of chronic renal failure one year after surgery, thus probably demonstrating the high percentage of its achievement (54.1 %). A positive surgical margin was observed in 1 (2.7 %) patients. Warm ischemia time of more than 25 minutes was used in 8 patients (21.6 %). Complications in the postoperative period (Clavien–dindo II and higher) were observed in 1 (2.7 %) patient. Trifecta and quadfecta rates were 78.4 % and 54.1 %, respectively. To analyze the surgeons’ experience, 37 renal cell cancer patients were divided into two subgroups with first 20 and subsequent robotic partial nephrectomies. There were no differences in gender, age and calculated RENAL value between 2 subgroups. depending on the surgeons’ experience, statistically significant differences in the duration of surgery (p=0.035) and blood loss during surgery (p=0.007) were found. Conclusion. Considering the extensive experience of surgeons in the field of laparoscopic surgery for tumors of the renal parenchyma, the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomies performed in 37 patients seem to be satisfactory and successful. The accumulated experience of surgeons after 20 robotic-assisted nephron-sparing surgeries makes it possible to significantly reduce surgery time and blood loss. The technique of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy requires further improvements.
期刊介绍:
The main objectives of the journal are: -to promote the establishment of Russia’s leading worldwide positions in the field of experimental and clinical oncology- to create the international discussion platform intended to cover all aspects of basic and clinical cancer research, including carcinogenesis, molecular biology, epidemiology, cancer prevention, diagnosis and multimodality treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy), anesthetic management, medical and social rehabilitation, palliative care as well as the improvement of life quality of cancer patients- to encourage promising young scientists to be actively involved in cancer research programs- to provide a platform for researches and doctors all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in cancer related problems. (to create a communication platform for the expansion of cooperation between Russian and foreign professional associations).- to provide the information about the latest worldwide achievements in different fields of oncology The most important tasks of the journal are: -to encourage scientists to publish their research results- to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest - to invite the most prominent Russian and foreign authors to share their latest research findings with cancer research community- to promote the exchange of research information, clinical experience, current trends and the recent developments in the field of oncology as well as to review interesting cases encountered by colleagues all over the world- to expand the editorial board and reviewers with the involvement of well-known Russian and foreign experts- to provide open access to full text articles- to include the journal into the international database- to increase the journal’s impact factor- to promote the journal to the International and Russian markets