有失语症和没有失语症的中风幸存者对交流和行动能力恢复的看法。

0 REHABILITATION
Advances in rehabilitation science and practice Pub Date : 2024-03-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536351241237865
Rhiannon M Smith, Megan E Schliep, Prudence Plummer
{"title":"有失语症和没有失语症的中风幸存者对交流和行动能力恢复的看法。","authors":"Rhiannon M Smith, Megan E Schliep, Prudence Plummer","doi":"10.1177/27536351241237865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-perceived recovery after stroke can substantially impact quality of life. Yet, a disability paradox exists whereby disability and perceived recovery do not align. This study explored stroke survivors' perceptions of their communication and mobility recovery, including perceived facilitators and barriers. Potential differences between the experiences of participants with aphasia (PWA) and participants without aphasia (PWOA) were also examined to explore the impact of communication disability on recovery experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 adults with stroke 3 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Qualitative data in the form of interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Participants described their communication recovery primarily in terms of word-finding difficulty and slowed language formulation; they described their mobility recovery in terms of their ability to walk, their use of an assistive device, or their ability to participate in pre-stroke activities. Facilitators to recovery were described in the areas of (1) family involvement, (2) rehabilitation services and professionals, (3) personal factors, and (4) the need for self-reliance. Barriers were expressed in the domains of (1) physical difficulties, (2) communication difficulties, and (3) psychological difficulties. Key findings from this study include perceived needs for a high intensity of rehabilitation, earlier implementation of communication partner training for families of stroke survivors with communication impairments, and consideration of factors outside of stroke when tailoring intervention to the individual. Overall, these findings suggest a continued need for individuation rather than standardization of care, with an eye to both impairment and broader quality of life factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72107,"journal":{"name":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","volume":"13 ","pages":"27536351241237865"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Communication and Mobility Recovery Among Stroke Survivors With and Without Aphasia.\",\"authors\":\"Rhiannon M Smith, Megan E Schliep, Prudence Plummer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536351241237865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Self-perceived recovery after stroke can substantially impact quality of life. Yet, a disability paradox exists whereby disability and perceived recovery do not align. This study explored stroke survivors' perceptions of their communication and mobility recovery, including perceived facilitators and barriers. Potential differences between the experiences of participants with aphasia (PWA) and participants without aphasia (PWOA) were also examined to explore the impact of communication disability on recovery experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 adults with stroke 3 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Qualitative data in the form of interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Participants described their communication recovery primarily in terms of word-finding difficulty and slowed language formulation; they described their mobility recovery in terms of their ability to walk, their use of an assistive device, or their ability to participate in pre-stroke activities. Facilitators to recovery were described in the areas of (1) family involvement, (2) rehabilitation services and professionals, (3) personal factors, and (4) the need for self-reliance. Barriers were expressed in the domains of (1) physical difficulties, (2) communication difficulties, and (3) psychological difficulties. Key findings from this study include perceived needs for a high intensity of rehabilitation, earlier implementation of communication partner training for families of stroke survivors with communication impairments, and consideration of factors outside of stroke when tailoring intervention to the individual. Overall, these findings suggest a continued need for individuation rather than standardization of care, with an eye to both impairment and broader quality of life factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"27536351241237865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351241237865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351241237865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中风后的自我感觉恢复会对生活质量产生重大影响。然而,残疾与感知康复并不一致,这就是残疾悖论。本研究探讨了中风幸存者对其交流和行动能力恢复的感知,包括感知到的促进因素和障碍。此外,还研究了有失语症的参与者(PWA)和无失语症的参与者(PWOA)在经历上的潜在差异,以探讨交流障碍对康复经历的影响。研究人员在住院康复出院 3 个月后对 17 名成年中风患者进行了半结构式访谈。采用主题内容分析法对访谈记录形式的定性数据进行了分析。受试者主要从找词困难和语言表达迟缓来描述其交流能力的恢复情况;从行走能力、使用辅助设备或参与中风前活动的能力来描述其行动能力的恢复情况。促进康复的因素包括:(1)家庭参与;(2)康复服务和专业人员;(3)个人因素;(4)自立的需要。障碍则表现在(1)身体上的困难,(2)沟通上的困难,以及(3)心理上的困难。本研究的主要发现包括对高强度康复的认知需求、为有交流障碍的中风幸存者家庭提早实施交流伙伴培训,以及在根据个人情况进行干预时考虑中风以外的因素。总之,这些研究结果表明,仍需要个性化而非标准化的护理,同时关注损伤和更广泛的生活质量因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Perceptions of Communication and Mobility Recovery Among Stroke Survivors With and Without Aphasia.

Perceptions of Communication and Mobility Recovery Among Stroke Survivors With and Without Aphasia.

Perceptions of Communication and Mobility Recovery Among Stroke Survivors With and Without Aphasia.

Perceptions of Communication and Mobility Recovery Among Stroke Survivors With and Without Aphasia.

Self-perceived recovery after stroke can substantially impact quality of life. Yet, a disability paradox exists whereby disability and perceived recovery do not align. This study explored stroke survivors' perceptions of their communication and mobility recovery, including perceived facilitators and barriers. Potential differences between the experiences of participants with aphasia (PWA) and participants without aphasia (PWOA) were also examined to explore the impact of communication disability on recovery experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 adults with stroke 3 months after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Qualitative data in the form of interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Participants described their communication recovery primarily in terms of word-finding difficulty and slowed language formulation; they described their mobility recovery in terms of their ability to walk, their use of an assistive device, or their ability to participate in pre-stroke activities. Facilitators to recovery were described in the areas of (1) family involvement, (2) rehabilitation services and professionals, (3) personal factors, and (4) the need for self-reliance. Barriers were expressed in the domains of (1) physical difficulties, (2) communication difficulties, and (3) psychological difficulties. Key findings from this study include perceived needs for a high intensity of rehabilitation, earlier implementation of communication partner training for families of stroke survivors with communication impairments, and consideration of factors outside of stroke when tailoring intervention to the individual. Overall, these findings suggest a continued need for individuation rather than standardization of care, with an eye to both impairment and broader quality of life factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信