墨西哥 2 型糖尿病患者口腔中的念珠菌种类与 TLR2 基因表达。

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nadia Mabel Pérez-Vielma, Modesto Gómez-López, María de Los Ángeles Martínez-Godínez, Ana Laura Luna-Torres, Aarón Domínguez López, Ángel Miliar-García
{"title":"墨西哥 2 型糖尿病患者口腔中的念珠菌种类与 TLR2 基因表达。","authors":"Nadia Mabel Pérez-Vielma, Modesto Gómez-López, María de Los Ángeles Martínez-Godínez, Ana Laura Luna-Torres, Aarón Domínguez López, Ángel Miliar-García","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14020031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim was to diagnose <i>Candida</i> in the oral cavity of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a genotyping technique and compare the results with those from conventional diagnosis by Papanicolaou (Pap) staining.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Palatal mucosa smears were performed on 18 dental care patients diagnosed with T2DM and grade I, II, and III prosthetic stomatitis who met the inclusion criteria; 18 healthy control subjects were also included in the study. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were determined from total blood. Using exfoliative cytology, the Pap staining technique was used to diagnose candidiasis. Exfoliative cytology was also used for molecular diagnosis; DNA was obtained for <i>Candida</i> genotyping, and RNA was used for gene expression studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical patterns indicated that all subjects were positive for <i>Candida</i>; however, Pap analysis revealed only three positive subjects, whereas end-point polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis revealed 15 subjects with some type of <i>Candida</i>. The most common <i>Candida</i> species found were <i>Candida guilliermondii</i> (38.8%), <i>Candida krusei</i> (33.3%), <i>Candida tropicalis</i>, <i>and Candida lusitaniae</i> (22.2%). Interestingly, the coexpression of different species of <i>Candida</i> was found in various patients. In all patients, HbA1c levels were increased. Gene expression analysis showed a significant decrease (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) in <i>TLR2</i> expression in positive subjects, whereas <i>TLR4</i> expression did not differ significantly among patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The end-point PCR technique showed better sensitivity for the diagnosis of <i>Candida</i> when compared with the diagnosis by Pap staining. T2DM subjects showed an increased presence of <i>C</i>. <i>guilliermondii</i> that was correlated with decreased <i>TLR2</i> expression.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 2","pages":"417-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Candida</i> Variety in the Oral Cavity of Mexican Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and TLR2 Gene Expression.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Mabel Pérez-Vielma, Modesto Gómez-López, María de Los Ángeles Martínez-Godínez, Ana Laura Luna-Torres, Aarón Domínguez López, Ángel Miliar-García\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clinpract14020031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim was to diagnose <i>Candida</i> in the oral cavity of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a genotyping technique and compare the results with those from conventional diagnosis by Papanicolaou (Pap) staining.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Palatal mucosa smears were performed on 18 dental care patients diagnosed with T2DM and grade I, II, and III prosthetic stomatitis who met the inclusion criteria; 18 healthy control subjects were also included in the study. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were determined from total blood. Using exfoliative cytology, the Pap staining technique was used to diagnose candidiasis. Exfoliative cytology was also used for molecular diagnosis; DNA was obtained for <i>Candida</i> genotyping, and RNA was used for gene expression studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical patterns indicated that all subjects were positive for <i>Candida</i>; however, Pap analysis revealed only three positive subjects, whereas end-point polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis revealed 15 subjects with some type of <i>Candida</i>. The most common <i>Candida</i> species found were <i>Candida guilliermondii</i> (38.8%), <i>Candida krusei</i> (33.3%), <i>Candida tropicalis</i>, <i>and Candida lusitaniae</i> (22.2%). Interestingly, the coexpression of different species of <i>Candida</i> was found in various patients. In all patients, HbA1c levels were increased. Gene expression analysis showed a significant decrease (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) in <i>TLR2</i> expression in positive subjects, whereas <i>TLR4</i> expression did not differ significantly among patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The end-point PCR technique showed better sensitivity for the diagnosis of <i>Candida</i> when compared with the diagnosis by Pap staining. T2DM subjects showed an increased presence of <i>C</i>. <i>guilliermondii</i> that was correlated with decreased <i>TLR2</i> expression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"417-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14020031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14020031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景目的是利用基因分型技术诊断2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者口腔中的念珠菌,并将结果与巴氏染色法(Papanicolaou)的传统诊断结果进行比较:对符合纳入标准的 18 名被诊断为 T2DM 和 I、II、III 级修复性口炎的牙科护理患者进行了腭粘膜涂片检查,同时还纳入了 18 名健康对照受试者。通过全血测定血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)水平。使用脱落细胞学技术、巴氏染色技术诊断念珠菌病。脱落细胞学还用于分子诊断;DNA 用于念珠菌基因分型,RNA 用于基因表达研究:结果:临床模式表明,所有受试者的念珠菌均呈阳性;然而,巴氏涂片分析显示只有三名受试者呈阳性,而终点聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析则显示 15 名受试者感染了某种念珠菌。最常见的念珠菌是吉利蒙地念珠菌(38.8%)、克鲁塞念珠菌(33.3%)、热带念珠菌和卢西塔尼亚念珠菌(22.2%)。有趣的是,不同种类的念珠菌在不同患者中同时存在。所有患者的 HbA1c 水平都有所升高。基因表达分析表明,阳性患者的 TLR2 表达量明显下降(p ≤ 0.05),而 TLR4 表达量在患者之间没有明显差异:结论:与巴氏染色诊断相比,终点 PCR 技术对念珠菌诊断的灵敏度更高。T2DM 受试者体内的 Guilliermondii 念珠菌数量增加与 TLR2 表达量减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Candida Variety in the Oral Cavity of Mexican Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and TLR2 Gene Expression.

Background: The aim was to diagnose Candida in the oral cavity of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a genotyping technique and compare the results with those from conventional diagnosis by Papanicolaou (Pap) staining.

Methods: Palatal mucosa smears were performed on 18 dental care patients diagnosed with T2DM and grade I, II, and III prosthetic stomatitis who met the inclusion criteria; 18 healthy control subjects were also included in the study. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were determined from total blood. Using exfoliative cytology, the Pap staining technique was used to diagnose candidiasis. Exfoliative cytology was also used for molecular diagnosis; DNA was obtained for Candida genotyping, and RNA was used for gene expression studies.

Results: Clinical patterns indicated that all subjects were positive for Candida; however, Pap analysis revealed only three positive subjects, whereas end-point polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis revealed 15 subjects with some type of Candida. The most common Candida species found were Candida guilliermondii (38.8%), Candida krusei (33.3%), Candida tropicalis, and Candida lusitaniae (22.2%). Interestingly, the coexpression of different species of Candida was found in various patients. In all patients, HbA1c levels were increased. Gene expression analysis showed a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) in TLR2 expression in positive subjects, whereas TLR4 expression did not differ significantly among patients.

Conclusions: The end-point PCR technique showed better sensitivity for the diagnosis of Candida when compared with the diagnosis by Pap staining. T2DM subjects showed an increased presence of C. guilliermondii that was correlated with decreased TLR2 expression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信