肥胖患者孕期前三个月解剖超声的学习曲线。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1159/000538477
Cara Buskmiller, Sarah E Toates, Vanessa Rodriguez, Edgar Hernandez-Andrade
{"title":"肥胖患者孕期前三个月解剖超声的学习曲线。","authors":"Cara Buskmiller, Sarah E Toates, Vanessa Rodriguez, Edgar Hernandez-Andrade","doi":"10.1159/000538477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A recent randomized controlled trial of first-trimester anatomy ultrasound in obese women found some advantages to using this technique in this population, but some aspects of feasibility were not clear, such as whether first-trimester ultrasound can be brought outside of a research setting. The learning curve for first-trimester anatomy has been described in the general population, but a learning curve has not been described for this technique in obese patients. This study sought to describe a learning curve for first-trimester anatomy ultrasounds in obese patients with an operator familiar with the basics of first-trimester imaging.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of the EASE-O pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04639973), which recruited 128 women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 and randomized them into two groups based on the timing of the first evaluation of fetal anatomy, to compare the completion rate of first- and second-trimester anatomy ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Pregnant women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Between January 2021 and February 2022, the study was conducted at maternal-fetal medicine clinics in Houston, TX, USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis evaluated data on the completion rate of first-trimester scans from the parent trial. Scans were grouped into bin sizes of 3, and prop_model for R version 4.2.0 for Windows was used to generate a learning curve across the first 60 scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The parent study included 60 scans performed by one imager who had previously only done first-trimester scans in lean patients for limited anatomy. The probability of a complete scan increased over 60 scans from 0.38 to 0.69; 29 scans were required to reach the final probability, after which only marginal improvement followed.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The major limitation is the inclusion of only one operator for this curve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For an ultrasound operator with basic familiarity in first-trimester imaging, approximately 30 scans are needed to acquire a completion rate of 70% for detailed first-trimester anatomy in women with BMI ≥35 kg/m2. This can be used in education and training programs focused on imaging in the first trimester.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"346-350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Learning Curve for First-Trimester Anatomy Ultrasound in Obese Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Cara Buskmiller, Sarah E Toates, Vanessa Rodriguez, Edgar Hernandez-Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A recent randomized controlled trial of first-trimester anatomy ultrasound in obese women found some advantages to using this technique in this population, but some aspects of feasibility were not clear, such as whether first-trimester ultrasound can be brought outside of a research setting. The learning curve for first-trimester anatomy has been described in the general population, but a learning curve has not been described for this technique in obese patients. This study sought to describe a learning curve for first-trimester anatomy ultrasounds in obese patients with an operator familiar with the basics of first-trimester imaging.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of the EASE-O pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04639973), which recruited 128 women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 and randomized them into two groups based on the timing of the first evaluation of fetal anatomy, to compare the completion rate of first- and second-trimester anatomy ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Pregnant women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Between January 2021 and February 2022, the study was conducted at maternal-fetal medicine clinics in Houston, TX, USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis evaluated data on the completion rate of first-trimester scans from the parent trial. Scans were grouped into bin sizes of 3, and prop_model for R version 4.2.0 for Windows was used to generate a learning curve across the first 60 scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The parent study included 60 scans performed by one imager who had previously only done first-trimester scans in lean patients for limited anatomy. The probability of a complete scan increased over 60 scans from 0.38 to 0.69; 29 scans were required to reach the final probability, after which only marginal improvement followed.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The major limitation is the inclusion of only one operator for this curve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For an ultrasound operator with basic familiarity in first-trimester imaging, approximately 30 scans are needed to acquire a completion rate of 70% for detailed first-trimester anatomy in women with BMI ≥35 kg/m2. This can be used in education and training programs focused on imaging in the first trimester.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"346-350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538477\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近对肥胖妇女进行的首次妊娠解剖超声随机对照试验发现,在肥胖妇女中使用该技术有一些优势,但可行性的某些方面尚不明确,例如首次妊娠超声是否可以在研究环境之外使用。在普通人群中已经描述了初产妇解剖学的学习曲线,但在肥胖患者中尚未描述该技术的学习曲线。本研究试图描述肥胖患者在熟悉第一胎成像基础知识的操作者中进行第一胎超声解剖的学习曲线:该试验招募了128名BMI≥35 kg/m2的孕妇,并根据首次评估胎儿解剖结构的时间将她们随机分为两组,以比较第一孕期和第二孕期解剖结构超声检查的完成率:BMI≥35 kg/m2 的孕妇:方法:这项二次分析评估了母体试验中第一胎扫描完成率的数据。扫描被分为 3 个大小的组,并使用适用于 Windows 的 R 4.2.0 版 prop_model 生成前 60 次扫描的学习曲线:结果:母体研究包括由一名成像者进行的 60 次扫描,该成像者之前只对瘦弱患者的有限解剖结构进行过一胎扫描。在 60 次扫描中,完整扫描的概率从 0.38 增加到 0.69;需要 29 次扫描才能达到最终概率,之后仅有轻微改善:局限性:主要局限性在于该曲线只包括了一名操作者:结论:对于一名基本熟悉妊娠头三个月成像的超声操作员来说,大约需要 30 次扫描才能使 BMI≥35 kg/m2 妇女妊娠头三个月详细解剖的完成率达到 70%。这可用于以妊娠头三个月成像为重点的教育和培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Learning Curve for First-Trimester Anatomy Ultrasound in Obese Patients.

Objectives: A recent randomized controlled trial of first-trimester anatomy ultrasound in obese women found some advantages to using this technique in this population, but some aspects of feasibility were not clear, such as whether first-trimester ultrasound can be brought outside of a research setting. The learning curve for first-trimester anatomy has been described in the general population, but a learning curve has not been described for this technique in obese patients. This study sought to describe a learning curve for first-trimester anatomy ultrasounds in obese patients with an operator familiar with the basics of first-trimester imaging.

Design: This was a secondary analysis of the EASE-O pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT04639973), which recruited 128 women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 and randomized them into two groups based on the timing of the first evaluation of fetal anatomy, to compare the completion rate of first- and second-trimester anatomy ultrasound.

Participants: Pregnant women with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 participated in the study.

Setting: Between January 2021 and February 2022, the study was conducted at maternal-fetal medicine clinics in Houston, TX, USA.

Methods: This secondary analysis evaluated data on the completion rate of first-trimester scans from the parent trial. Scans were grouped into bin sizes of 3, and prop_model for R version 4.2.0 for Windows was used to generate a learning curve across the first 60 scans.

Results: The parent study included 60 scans performed by one imager who had previously only done first-trimester scans in lean patients for limited anatomy. The probability of a complete scan increased over 60 scans from 0.38 to 0.69; 29 scans were required to reach the final probability, after which only marginal improvement followed.

Limitations: The major limitation is the inclusion of only one operator for this curve.

Conclusions: For an ultrasound operator with basic familiarity in first-trimester imaging, approximately 30 scans are needed to acquire a completion rate of 70% for detailed first-trimester anatomy in women with BMI ≥35 kg/m2. This can be used in education and training programs focused on imaging in the first trimester.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信