系统性硬化症患者惯用手和对侧手的功能障碍。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Salomé Fourmond, Simon Parreau, Stéphanie Dumonteil, Charlotte Verdie-Kessler, Kim-Heang Ly, Philippe Lacroix, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Philippe Bernard, Sylvain Palat
{"title":"系统性硬化症患者惯用手和对侧手的功能障碍。","authors":"Salomé Fourmond, Simon Parreau, Stéphanie Dumonteil, Charlotte Verdie-Kessler, Kim-Heang Ly, Philippe Lacroix, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Philippe Bernard, Sylvain Palat","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db7upl","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hand involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is responsible for 75% of the overall disability but varies greatly among individuals. No study has yet compared the functionalities between the two hands of SSc patients. We thus evaluated the joint limitations and extent of skin involvement in the dominant and contralateral hands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, descriptive, comparative single-centre study enrolled SSc patients diagnosed using the ACR/EULAR criteria. We assessed limitations in the joint range of motion during active and passive mobilisation; the first commissure opening angles; the Kapandji scale and Rodnan hand scores; the digital pressures; the finger brachial pressure indices; and the number of telangiectasias, calcinosis, digital ulcerations, and painful joints on each hand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included. Spontaneous flexion joint limitations were significantly greater in the dominant hand (p<0.0001). The Kapandji score was lower (p<0.001) and the Rodnan hand score significantly higher, for the dominant hand (p<0.001). The digital pressure was similar between the hands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dominant hand exhibited significantly more skin sclerosis and mean flexion deterioration, a lower Kapandji score, and a tendency toward reduced mean extension, compared with the other hand. No vascular pathology was noted in either hand. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to draw therapeutic conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The functional disabilities of the dominant and opposite hands in patients with systemic sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Salomé Fourmond, Simon Parreau, Stéphanie Dumonteil, Charlotte Verdie-Kessler, Kim-Heang Ly, Philippe Lacroix, Anne-Laure Fauchais, Philippe Bernard, Sylvain Palat\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db7upl\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hand involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is responsible for 75% of the overall disability but varies greatly among individuals. No study has yet compared the functionalities between the two hands of SSc patients. We thus evaluated the joint limitations and extent of skin involvement in the dominant and contralateral hands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, descriptive, comparative single-centre study enrolled SSc patients diagnosed using the ACR/EULAR criteria. We assessed limitations in the joint range of motion during active and passive mobilisation; the first commissure opening angles; the Kapandji scale and Rodnan hand scores; the digital pressures; the finger brachial pressure indices; and the number of telangiectasias, calcinosis, digital ulcerations, and painful joints on each hand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients were included. Spontaneous flexion joint limitations were significantly greater in the dominant hand (p<0.0001). The Kapandji score was lower (p<0.001) and the Rodnan hand score significantly higher, for the dominant hand (p<0.001). The digital pressure was similar between the hands.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dominant hand exhibited significantly more skin sclerosis and mean flexion deterioration, a lower Kapandji score, and a tendency toward reduced mean extension, compared with the other hand. No vascular pathology was noted in either hand. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to draw therapeutic conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db7upl\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/db7upl","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统性硬化症(SSc)患者手部受累占整体残疾的 75%,但个体差异很大。目前还没有研究对 SSc 患者双手的功能进行比较。因此,我们对显性和对侧双手的关节限制和皮肤受累程度进行了评估:这项前瞻性、描述性、比较性单中心研究招募了根据 ACR/EULAR 标准确诊的 SSc 患者。我们评估了主动和被动活动时关节活动范围的限制、第一关节突开口角度、Kapandji量表和Rodnan手部评分、数字压力、指肱压指数以及每只手毛细血管扩张、钙化、数字溃疡和疼痛关节的数量:共纳入 30 名患者。显性手的自发屈关节受限程度明显更高(p结论:显性手的皮肤受限程度明显更高:与另一只手相比,显性手的皮肤硬化和平均屈曲度恶化程度明显更严重,Kapandji评分更低,平均伸展度呈下降趋势。两只手均未发现血管病变。要确认这些结果并得出治疗结论,还需要更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The functional disabilities of the dominant and opposite hands in patients with systemic sclerosis.

Objectives: Hand involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is responsible for 75% of the overall disability but varies greatly among individuals. No study has yet compared the functionalities between the two hands of SSc patients. We thus evaluated the joint limitations and extent of skin involvement in the dominant and contralateral hands.

Methods: This prospective, descriptive, comparative single-centre study enrolled SSc patients diagnosed using the ACR/EULAR criteria. We assessed limitations in the joint range of motion during active and passive mobilisation; the first commissure opening angles; the Kapandji scale and Rodnan hand scores; the digital pressures; the finger brachial pressure indices; and the number of telangiectasias, calcinosis, digital ulcerations, and painful joints on each hand.

Results: Thirty patients were included. Spontaneous flexion joint limitations were significantly greater in the dominant hand (p<0.0001). The Kapandji score was lower (p<0.001) and the Rodnan hand score significantly higher, for the dominant hand (p<0.001). The digital pressure was similar between the hands.

Conclusions: The dominant hand exhibited significantly more skin sclerosis and mean flexion deterioration, a lower Kapandji score, and a tendency toward reduced mean extension, compared with the other hand. No vascular pathology was noted in either hand. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to draw therapeutic conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信