钠离子电池的学习速度有多快?评估与锂离子电池相比的技术经济竞争力方案

Adrian Yao, Sally M. Benson, William C. Chueh
{"title":"钠离子电池的学习速度有多快?评估与锂离子电池相比的技术经济竞争力方案","authors":"Adrian Yao, Sally M. Benson, William C. Chueh","doi":"arxiv-2403.13759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sodium-ion (Na-ion) batteries have garnered significant attention as a\npotentially low-cost alternative to lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, which have\nexperienced challenges in supply availability and volatility in pricing of key\nminerals. Here we assess their techno-economic competitiveness against\nincumbent lithium-ion batteries using a modeling framework incorporating\ncomponential learning curves constrained by minerals prices and engineering\ndesign floors. We compare projected Na-ion and Li-ion price trends across over\n5,400 scenarios while varying Na-ion technology development roadmaps, supply\nchain scenarios, market penetration, and learning rates. We show that Na-ion\nstruggles to be price advantageous against low-cost lithium-ion variants in the\nnear term and are competitive primarily when the Li-ion supply chain is\ndisrupted. Modeled outcomes suggest maximizing Na-ion energy densities via\ncost-centric development roadmaps to be the most impactful way to improve\ncompetitiveness (over that of market intervention) and highlights the value of\nenhanced supply chain security.","PeriodicalId":501304,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How quickly can sodium-ion learn? Assessing scenarios for techno-economic competitiveness against lithium-ion batteries\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Yao, Sally M. Benson, William C. Chueh\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2403.13759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sodium-ion (Na-ion) batteries have garnered significant attention as a\\npotentially low-cost alternative to lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, which have\\nexperienced challenges in supply availability and volatility in pricing of key\\nminerals. Here we assess their techno-economic competitiveness against\\nincumbent lithium-ion batteries using a modeling framework incorporating\\ncomponential learning curves constrained by minerals prices and engineering\\ndesign floors. We compare projected Na-ion and Li-ion price trends across over\\n5,400 scenarios while varying Na-ion technology development roadmaps, supply\\nchain scenarios, market penetration, and learning rates. We show that Na-ion\\nstruggles to be price advantageous against low-cost lithium-ion variants in the\\nnear term and are competitive primarily when the Li-ion supply chain is\\ndisrupted. Modeled outcomes suggest maximizing Na-ion energy densities via\\ncost-centric development roadmaps to be the most impactful way to improve\\ncompetitiveness (over that of market intervention) and highlights the value of\\nenhanced supply chain security.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.13759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.13759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钠离子(Na-ion)电池作为锂离子(Li-ion)电池的潜在低成本替代品备受关注。在此,我们使用一个建模框架,结合受矿产品价格和工程设计下限限制的连续学习曲线,评估其与现有锂离子电池的技术经济竞争力。我们比较了超过 5400 种情景下镍离子和锂离子电池的预计价格趋势,同时改变了镍离子电池的技术发展路线图、供应链情景、市场渗透率和学习率。我们的研究表明,与低成本的锂离子变体相比,锰酸锂在短期内难以取得价格优势,主要是在锂离子供应链中断时才具有竞争力。建模结果表明,以成本为中心的发展路线图是提高竞争力的最有效途径(超过市场干预),并强调了加强供应链安全的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How quickly can sodium-ion learn? Assessing scenarios for techno-economic competitiveness against lithium-ion batteries
Sodium-ion (Na-ion) batteries have garnered significant attention as a potentially low-cost alternative to lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, which have experienced challenges in supply availability and volatility in pricing of key minerals. Here we assess their techno-economic competitiveness against incumbent lithium-ion batteries using a modeling framework incorporating componential learning curves constrained by minerals prices and engineering design floors. We compare projected Na-ion and Li-ion price trends across over 5,400 scenarios while varying Na-ion technology development roadmaps, supply chain scenarios, market penetration, and learning rates. We show that Na-ion struggles to be price advantageous against low-cost lithium-ion variants in the near term and are competitive primarily when the Li-ion supply chain is disrupted. Modeled outcomes suggest maximizing Na-ion energy densities via cost-centric development roadmaps to be the most impactful way to improve competitiveness (over that of market intervention) and highlights the value of enhanced supply chain security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信