{"title":"双面平台上的卖家竞争","authors":"Neaketa Chawla, Debasis Mondal","doi":"10.1007/s00712-024-00862-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two-sided platforms connect two or more distinct user groups. Agents on such a platform not only value the participation of users from a different group but are also affected by the same-side network effects that arise from the participation of agents in their own group. We study how negative same-side network effects among sellers affect the participation levels and profit of a monopoly platform. We use a novel specification of the CES utility function to model our consumer preferences, where taste for variety and substitutability are not interrelated. We find that when the platform implements subscription pricing on both sides, an increase in the intensity of competition (higher negative same-side network effects) amongst sellers leads to more participation from both buyers and sellers and there is an increase in the profit of the platform. On the other hand, when the platform can only charge a fee from the seller, participation on both sides first rises and then falls. The platform’s profit also follows the same trend. We also briefly discuss how prices of competing platforms change when there is an increase in the intensity of competition amongst sellers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47523,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seller competition on two-sided platforms\",\"authors\":\"Neaketa Chawla, Debasis Mondal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00712-024-00862-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two-sided platforms connect two or more distinct user groups. Agents on such a platform not only value the participation of users from a different group but are also affected by the same-side network effects that arise from the participation of agents in their own group. We study how negative same-side network effects among sellers affect the participation levels and profit of a monopoly platform. We use a novel specification of the CES utility function to model our consumer preferences, where taste for variety and substitutability are not interrelated. We find that when the platform implements subscription pricing on both sides, an increase in the intensity of competition (higher negative same-side network effects) amongst sellers leads to more participation from both buyers and sellers and there is an increase in the profit of the platform. On the other hand, when the platform can only charge a fee from the seller, participation on both sides first rises and then falls. The platform’s profit also follows the same trend. We also briefly discuss how prices of competing platforms change when there is an increase in the intensity of competition amongst sellers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economics\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-024-00862-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-024-00862-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
双面平台连接着两个或多个不同的用户群体。这种平台上的代理不仅重视来自不同群体用户的参与,而且还会受到本群体代理参与所产生的同侧网络效应的影响。我们研究了卖家之间的负同侧网络效应如何影响垄断平台的参与水平和利润。我们使用一种新颖的 CES 效用函数来模拟消费者偏好,在这种情况下,消费者对多样性和可替代性的喜好并不相互关联。我们发现,当平台对双方都实行订阅定价时,卖家之间竞争强度的增加(更高的同侧负网络效应)会导致买卖双方更多的参与,平台的利润也会增加。另一方面,当平台只能向卖方收取费用时,双方的参与度会先升后降。平台的利润也会呈现同样的趋势。我们还简要讨论了当卖家之间的竞争强度增加时,竞争平台的价格如何变化。
Two-sided platforms connect two or more distinct user groups. Agents on such a platform not only value the participation of users from a different group but are also affected by the same-side network effects that arise from the participation of agents in their own group. We study how negative same-side network effects among sellers affect the participation levels and profit of a monopoly platform. We use a novel specification of the CES utility function to model our consumer preferences, where taste for variety and substitutability are not interrelated. We find that when the platform implements subscription pricing on both sides, an increase in the intensity of competition (higher negative same-side network effects) amongst sellers leads to more participation from both buyers and sellers and there is an increase in the profit of the platform. On the other hand, when the platform can only charge a fee from the seller, participation on both sides first rises and then falls. The platform’s profit also follows the same trend. We also briefly discuss how prices of competing platforms change when there is an increase in the intensity of competition amongst sellers.
期刊介绍:
Specializing in mathematical economic theory, Journal of Economics focuses on microeconomic theory while also publishing papers on macroeconomic topics as well as econometric case studies of general interest. Regular supplementary volumes are devoted to topics of central importance to both modern theoretical research and present economic reality. Fields of interest: applied economic theory and ist empirical testing.Officially cited as: J Econ