用户驱动的孕期剂量选择框架:舍曲林的概念验证

Charlotte Koldeweij, Caroline Dibbets, Bryony Dean Franklin, Hubertina C.J. Scheepers, Saskia N de Wildt
{"title":"用户驱动的孕期剂量选择框架:舍曲林的概念验证","authors":"Charlotte Koldeweij, Caroline Dibbets, Bryony Dean Franklin, Hubertina C.J. Scheepers, Saskia N de Wildt","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.19.24304542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite growing knowledge of pregnancy-induced changes in physiology that may alter maternal and fetal pharmacokinetics, and therefore drug efficacy and safety, evidence-based antenatal doses are lacking for most drugs. Pharmacokinetic models and expanding clinical data in pregnancy may support antenatal doses. In this article, we introduce a comprehensive and user-driven Framework for Dose Selection in Pregnancy (FDSP), developed and validated to support the clinical implementation of best-evidence and in some cases, model-informed doses for pregnant women and/or fetuses. After initial development and validation by experts, the framework prototype was piloted to formulate an antenatal dosing strategy for sertraline in depression and anxiety disorders. Next, the framework was validated and assessed for usability by a multidisciplinary working committee of end-users comprising healthcare practitioners, experts from other disciplines including pharmacometrics, reproductive toxicology and medical ethics, alongside pregnant women and a partner. The resulting framework encompasses the following: rationale for drug selection, a comprehensive analysis of pharmacokinetic and dose-related efficacy and safety data, and implementation aspects including feasibility and desirability of the recommended antenatal dose based on a structured maternal and fetal benefit-risk assessment. An antenatal dose recommendation for sertraline, as a proof-of-concept, was formulated using this approach and endorsed for clinical use by the working committee. The FDSP, as demonstrated by the example of sertraline, is fit for supporting the development of best-evidence acceptable and clinically feasible antenatal doses.","PeriodicalId":501447,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A user-driven framework for dose selection in pregnancy: proof-of-concept for sertraline\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Koldeweij, Caroline Dibbets, Bryony Dean Franklin, Hubertina C.J. Scheepers, Saskia N de Wildt\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.19.24304542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite growing knowledge of pregnancy-induced changes in physiology that may alter maternal and fetal pharmacokinetics, and therefore drug efficacy and safety, evidence-based antenatal doses are lacking for most drugs. Pharmacokinetic models and expanding clinical data in pregnancy may support antenatal doses. In this article, we introduce a comprehensive and user-driven Framework for Dose Selection in Pregnancy (FDSP), developed and validated to support the clinical implementation of best-evidence and in some cases, model-informed doses for pregnant women and/or fetuses. After initial development and validation by experts, the framework prototype was piloted to formulate an antenatal dosing strategy for sertraline in depression and anxiety disorders. Next, the framework was validated and assessed for usability by a multidisciplinary working committee of end-users comprising healthcare practitioners, experts from other disciplines including pharmacometrics, reproductive toxicology and medical ethics, alongside pregnant women and a partner. The resulting framework encompasses the following: rationale for drug selection, a comprehensive analysis of pharmacokinetic and dose-related efficacy and safety data, and implementation aspects including feasibility and desirability of the recommended antenatal dose based on a structured maternal and fetal benefit-risk assessment. An antenatal dose recommendation for sertraline, as a proof-of-concept, was formulated using this approach and endorsed for clinical use by the working committee. The FDSP, as demonstrated by the example of sertraline, is fit for supporting the development of best-evidence acceptable and clinically feasible antenatal doses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.19.24304542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.19.24304542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们对妊娠引起的生理变化有了越来越多的了解,这些变化可能会改变母体和胎儿的药代动力学,从而改变药物的疗效和安全性,但大多数药物都缺乏以证据为基础的产前剂量。妊娠期药代动力学模型和不断增加的临床数据可能会支持产前剂量。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了一个全面的、用户驱动的妊娠期剂量选择框架(FDSP),该框架经过开发和验证,可支持临床实施最佳证据剂量,在某些情况下还可支持根据模型确定的孕妇和/或胎儿剂量。经过专家的初步开发和验证,该框架原型被试用于制定抑郁症和焦虑症患者舍曲林的产前剂量策略。接下来,由医疗保健从业人员、药物计量学、生殖毒理学和医学伦理学等其他学科的专家以及孕妇和一名伴侣组成的最终用户多学科工作委员会对该框架进行了验证和可用性评估。最终形成的框架包括以下内容:药物选择的基本原理、药代动力学和剂量相关疗效和安全性数据的综合分析,以及实施方面的内容,包括基于结构化母体和胎儿获益风险评估的产前剂量推荐的可行性和可取性。作为概念验证,舍曲林的产前剂量建议就是采用这种方法制定的,并经工作委员会批准用于临床。舍曲林的例子表明,FDSP 适合于支持制定最佳证据可接受且临床可行的产前剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A user-driven framework for dose selection in pregnancy: proof-of-concept for sertraline
Despite growing knowledge of pregnancy-induced changes in physiology that may alter maternal and fetal pharmacokinetics, and therefore drug efficacy and safety, evidence-based antenatal doses are lacking for most drugs. Pharmacokinetic models and expanding clinical data in pregnancy may support antenatal doses. In this article, we introduce a comprehensive and user-driven Framework for Dose Selection in Pregnancy (FDSP), developed and validated to support the clinical implementation of best-evidence and in some cases, model-informed doses for pregnant women and/or fetuses. After initial development and validation by experts, the framework prototype was piloted to formulate an antenatal dosing strategy for sertraline in depression and anxiety disorders. Next, the framework was validated and assessed for usability by a multidisciplinary working committee of end-users comprising healthcare practitioners, experts from other disciplines including pharmacometrics, reproductive toxicology and medical ethics, alongside pregnant women and a partner. The resulting framework encompasses the following: rationale for drug selection, a comprehensive analysis of pharmacokinetic and dose-related efficacy and safety data, and implementation aspects including feasibility and desirability of the recommended antenatal dose based on a structured maternal and fetal benefit-risk assessment. An antenatal dose recommendation for sertraline, as a proof-of-concept, was formulated using this approach and endorsed for clinical use by the working committee. The FDSP, as demonstrated by the example of sertraline, is fit for supporting the development of best-evidence acceptable and clinically feasible antenatal doses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信