从面部特征自动检测谎言综述

IF 1.2 3区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Hugues Delmas, Vincent Denault, Judee K. Burgoon, Norah E. Dunbar
{"title":"从面部特征自动检测谎言综述","authors":"Hugues Delmas, Vincent Denault, Judee K. Burgoon, Norah E. Dunbar","doi":"10.1007/s10919-024-00451-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growth of machine learning and artificial intelligence has made it possible for automatic lie detection systems to emerge. These can be based on a variety of cues, such as facial features. However, there is a lack of knowledge about both the development and the accuracy of such systems. To address this lack, we conducted a review of studies that have investigated automatic lie detection systems by using facial features. Our analysis of twenty-eight eligible studies focused on four main categories: dataset features, facial features used, classifier features and publication features. Overall, the findings showed that automatic lie detection systems rely on diverse technologies, facial features, and measurements. They are mainly based on factual lies, regardless of the stakes involved. On average, these automatic systems were based on a dataset of 52 individuals and achieved an average accuracy ranging from 61.87% to 72.93% in distinguishing between truth-tellers and liars, depending on the types of classifiers used. However, although the leakage hypothesis was the most used explanatory framework, many studies did not provide sufficient theoretical justification for the choice of facial features and their measurements. Bridging the gap between psychology and the computational-engineering field should help to combine theoretical frameworks with technical advancements in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":47747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonverbal Behavior","volume":"196 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Automatic Lie Detection from Facial Features\",\"authors\":\"Hugues Delmas, Vincent Denault, Judee K. Burgoon, Norah E. Dunbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10919-024-00451-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The growth of machine learning and artificial intelligence has made it possible for automatic lie detection systems to emerge. These can be based on a variety of cues, such as facial features. However, there is a lack of knowledge about both the development and the accuracy of such systems. To address this lack, we conducted a review of studies that have investigated automatic lie detection systems by using facial features. Our analysis of twenty-eight eligible studies focused on four main categories: dataset features, facial features used, classifier features and publication features. Overall, the findings showed that automatic lie detection systems rely on diverse technologies, facial features, and measurements. They are mainly based on factual lies, regardless of the stakes involved. On average, these automatic systems were based on a dataset of 52 individuals and achieved an average accuracy ranging from 61.87% to 72.93% in distinguishing between truth-tellers and liars, depending on the types of classifiers used. However, although the leakage hypothesis was the most used explanatory framework, many studies did not provide sufficient theoretical justification for the choice of facial features and their measurements. Bridging the gap between psychology and the computational-engineering field should help to combine theoretical frameworks with technical advancements in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nonverbal Behavior\",\"volume\":\"196 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nonverbal Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-024-00451-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonverbal Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-024-00451-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着机器学习和人工智能的发展,自动测谎系统应运而生。这些系统可以基于面部特征等各种线索。然而,人们对这类系统的开发和准确性都缺乏了解。为了解决这一问题,我们回顾了利用面部特征对自动测谎系统进行调查的研究。我们对 28 项符合条件的研究进行了分析,主要集中在四个方面:数据集特征、使用的面部特征、分类器特征和发布特征。总体而言,研究结果表明,自动测谎系统依赖于不同的技术、面部特征和测量方法。它们主要基于事实性谎言,而不考虑所涉及的利害关系。平均而言,这些自动系统以 52 个人的数据集为基础,在区分说真话者和说谎者方面达到了 61.87% 至 72.93% 的平均准确率,具体取决于所使用的分类器类型。然而,尽管泄漏假说是使用最多的解释框架,但许多研究并没有为面部特征的选择及其测量提供充分的理论依据。缩小心理学与计算工程领域之间的差距,有助于将理论框架与该领域的技术进步结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of Automatic Lie Detection from Facial Features

The growth of machine learning and artificial intelligence has made it possible for automatic lie detection systems to emerge. These can be based on a variety of cues, such as facial features. However, there is a lack of knowledge about both the development and the accuracy of such systems. To address this lack, we conducted a review of studies that have investigated automatic lie detection systems by using facial features. Our analysis of twenty-eight eligible studies focused on four main categories: dataset features, facial features used, classifier features and publication features. Overall, the findings showed that automatic lie detection systems rely on diverse technologies, facial features, and measurements. They are mainly based on factual lies, regardless of the stakes involved. On average, these automatic systems were based on a dataset of 52 individuals and achieved an average accuracy ranging from 61.87% to 72.93% in distinguishing between truth-tellers and liars, depending on the types of classifiers used. However, although the leakage hypothesis was the most used explanatory framework, many studies did not provide sufficient theoretical justification for the choice of facial features and their measurements. Bridging the gap between psychology and the computational-engineering field should help to combine theoretical frameworks with technical advancements in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior presents peer-reviewed original theoretical and empirical research on all major areas of nonverbal behavior. Specific topics include paralanguage, proxemics, facial expressions, eye contact, face-to-face interaction, and nonverbal emotional expression, as well as other subjects which contribute to the scientific understanding of nonverbal processes and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信