(3021-3022) 关于保留 Brochoneura(有一个保留类型)和 Cephalosphaera(肉豆蔻科)名称的建议

IF 3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Taxon Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1002/tax.13155
Zacky Ezedin, Hervé Sauquet
{"title":"(3021-3022) 关于保留 Brochoneura(有一个保留类型)和 Cephalosphaera(肉豆蔻科)名称的建议","authors":"Zacky Ezedin, Hervé Sauquet","doi":"10.1002/tax.13155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>(3021) <b><i>Brochoneura</i></b> Warb. in Engler, Pflanzenw. Ost-Afrikas C: 179. Jul 1895 [<i>Myristic</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\n<p>Typus: <i>B. madagascariensis</i> (Lam.) Warb. (in Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 68: 234. Dec 1897) (<i>Myristica madagascariensis</i> Lam.), typ. cons. prop.</p>\n<p>(3022) <b><i>Cephalosphaera</i></b> Warb. in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 33: 383. 13 Mar 1903 [<i>Myristic</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\n<p>Typus: <i>C. usambarensis</i> (Warb.) Warb. (<i>Brochoneura usambarensis</i> Warb.).</p>\n<p><i>Myristicaceae</i> is a pantropical family of angiosperms comprising 21 genera and ca. 500 species. Recently, Figueiredo &amp; Smith (in Phytotaxa 456: 299–300. 2020) proposed nomenclatural changes for the generic names <i>Brochoneura</i> and <i>Cephalosphaera</i>. Prior to their proposal, the name <i>Brochoneura</i> had been applied to a group of three species in Madagascar (Sauquet in Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 351–368. 2004) whereas <i>Cephalosphaera</i> was exclusively applied to a single East African species. The proposed changes would have the name <i>Brochoneura</i> instead applied to the East African species while the Malagasy group would be renamed <i>Neobrochoneura</i> Figueiredo &amp; Gideon F. Sm. This proposed name swap by Figueiredo &amp; Smith followed their discovery of what may have been an unintentional name swap made by Otto Warburg, who originally published the name <i>Brochoneura</i> for the East African species (Warburg in Engler, Pflanzenw. Ost-Afrikas C: 180. 1895) and subsequently expanded the genus to incorporate three Malagasy species originally included in <i>Myristica</i> (Warburg in Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 68: 237. 1897). Later, he published the monotypic East African genus <i>Cephalosphaera</i> (Warburg in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 33: 383. 1903) for <i>B. usambarensis</i>, the original type of <i>Brochoneura</i>, while restricting <i>Brochoneura</i> to the Malagasy group. To rectify this centuries-old error by Warburg, the authors proposed to have <i>Brochoneura</i> reinstated for the monotypic East African genus and give the Malagasy group a new name, <i>Neobrochoneura</i>.</p>\n<p>Although the name switch only affects a handful of species, it is nonetheless not helpful and may result in confusion, especially since the names in their pre-2020 sense have become well-established in the taxonomic and floristic literature. The name <i>Brochoneura</i> has been applied to the Malagasy group for well over a century whereas it had only been applied to the East African taxon for a mere eight years, namely from 1895 to 1903. Both genera also have important economic uses.</p>\n<p>The East African <i>Cephalosphaera</i> (vernacular: mtambao) has historically been regarded as an economically valuable timber species, having been selectively logged since at least the mid-20th century (Waser &amp; al. in Tanzania J. Forest. Nat. Conserv. 82(2): 42–49. 2013). In the 1960s, it was noted as “one of the most useful multi-purpose timber trees” and in the 1970s, the species became a “major source” of plywood, eventually leading to it being ranked eighth on the list of most important timbers of the East Usambara Mountains in 1985 (Lemmens &amp; al. in Pl. Resources Trop. Afr. 7: 199. 2012).</p>\n<p>The Malagasy <i>Brochoneura</i> (vernacular: mafotra, rara) has likewise been reported as an economically important group, with the species <i>B. acuminata</i> Warb. having uses ranging from construction to medicine (Bollen &amp; Donati in Oryx 40: 1–10. 2006; Onjalalaina &amp; al. in Forests 12(566): 1–20. 2021). The species <i>B. acuminata</i> is also known to have ecological significance. It is among the most abundant tree species encountered in the lowland tropical forests of eastern Madagascar, with an estimated density of 104 trees/ha recorded from southeast Madagascar (Campera &amp; al. in Land (Basel) 12(81): 1–20. 2023). In addition, <i>B. acuminata</i> has been reported to serve as an important food source for several species of lemurs including the southern wolly lemur (<i>Avahi meridionalis</i>) and Mittermeier's sportive lemur (<i>Lepilemur mittermeieri</i>), the former of which utilizes the tree as its second most preferred food item during the lean season (Balestri, Ecology and Conservation of the Southern Woolly Lemur (<i>Avahi meridionalis</i>) in the Tsitongambarika Protected Area, South-eastern Madagascar [Ph.D. dissertation, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford]. 2018; Wilmet &amp; al. in Lemur News 22: 26–30. 2020).</p>\n<p>The names <i>Brochoneura</i> and <i>Cephalosphaera</i> appear widely in floristic literature and regional checklists (e.g., Ngumbau &amp; al. in PhytoKeys 147: 1. 2020). In the scientific literature, the names continue to be applied in their pre-2020 sense, even after the publication by Figueiredo &amp; Smith (e.g., Ndangalasi &amp; al. in PLoS ONE 16(5): e0250859. 2021; Raharisoa &amp; al. in J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 10: 104–109. 2021; Frost &amp; al. in J. Biogeogr. 49(1): 156–170. 2022; Cheek &amp; Luke in Kew Bull. 78: 469–497. 2023; and Lolila &amp; al. in PLoS ONE 18(3): e0282528. 2023). This demonstrates the well-established nature of the names among researchers across multiple fields.</p>\n<p>Therefore, we believe the sudden swapping of the application of <i>Brochoneura</i> to the Tanzanian species after more than a century of use for Madagascar species will only result in confusion among researchers, taxonomists, and conservation biologists working in Madagascar and East Africa. To preserve nomenclatural stability, the names <i>Brochoneura</i> and <i>Cephalosphaera</i> should be retained in their former sense. This can be achieved by conserving <i>Brochoneura</i> with a Madagacar species name (<i>B. madagascariensis</i>) as type and, conserving <i>Cephalosphaera</i> to make it legitimate, as Warburg included the original type of <i>Brochoneura</i> in the protologue of <i>Cephalosphaera</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(3021–3022) Proposals to conserve the names Brochoneura, with a conserved type, and Cephalosphaera (Myristicaceae)\",\"authors\":\"Zacky Ezedin, Hervé Sauquet\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tax.13155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>(3021) <b><i>Brochoneura</i></b> Warb. in Engler, Pflanzenw. Ost-Afrikas C: 179. Jul 1895 [<i>Myristic</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\\n<p>Typus: <i>B. madagascariensis</i> (Lam.) Warb. (in Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 68: 234. Dec 1897) (<i>Myristica madagascariensis</i> Lam.), typ. cons. prop.</p>\\n<p>(3022) <b><i>Cephalosphaera</i></b> Warb. in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 33: 383. 13 Mar 1903 [<i>Myristic</i>.], nom. cons. prop.</p>\\n<p>Typus: <i>C. usambarensis</i> (Warb.) Warb. (<i>Brochoneura usambarensis</i> Warb.).</p>\\n<p><i>Myristicaceae</i> is a pantropical family of angiosperms comprising 21 genera and ca. 500 species. Recently, Figueiredo &amp; Smith (in Phytotaxa 456: 299–300. 2020) proposed nomenclatural changes for the generic names <i>Brochoneura</i> and <i>Cephalosphaera</i>. Prior to their proposal, the name <i>Brochoneura</i> had been applied to a group of three species in Madagascar (Sauquet in Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 351–368. 2004) whereas <i>Cephalosphaera</i> was exclusively applied to a single East African species. The proposed changes would have the name <i>Brochoneura</i> instead applied to the East African species while the Malagasy group would be renamed <i>Neobrochoneura</i> Figueiredo &amp; Gideon F. Sm. This proposed name swap by Figueiredo &amp; Smith followed their discovery of what may have been an unintentional name swap made by Otto Warburg, who originally published the name <i>Brochoneura</i> for the East African species (Warburg in Engler, Pflanzenw. Ost-Afrikas C: 180. 1895) and subsequently expanded the genus to incorporate three Malagasy species originally included in <i>Myristica</i> (Warburg in Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 68: 237. 1897). Later, he published the monotypic East African genus <i>Cephalosphaera</i> (Warburg in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 33: 383. 1903) for <i>B. usambarensis</i>, the original type of <i>Brochoneura</i>, while restricting <i>Brochoneura</i> to the Malagasy group. To rectify this centuries-old error by Warburg, the authors proposed to have <i>Brochoneura</i> reinstated for the monotypic East African genus and give the Malagasy group a new name, <i>Neobrochoneura</i>.</p>\\n<p>Although the name switch only affects a handful of species, it is nonetheless not helpful and may result in confusion, especially since the names in their pre-2020 sense have become well-established in the taxonomic and floristic literature. The name <i>Brochoneura</i> has been applied to the Malagasy group for well over a century whereas it had only been applied to the East African taxon for a mere eight years, namely from 1895 to 1903. Both genera also have important economic uses.</p>\\n<p>The East African <i>Cephalosphaera</i> (vernacular: mtambao) has historically been regarded as an economically valuable timber species, having been selectively logged since at least the mid-20th century (Waser &amp; al. in Tanzania J. Forest. Nat. Conserv. 82(2): 42–49. 2013). In the 1960s, it was noted as “one of the most useful multi-purpose timber trees” and in the 1970s, the species became a “major source” of plywood, eventually leading to it being ranked eighth on the list of most important timbers of the East Usambara Mountains in 1985 (Lemmens &amp; al. in Pl. Resources Trop. Afr. 7: 199. 2012).</p>\\n<p>The Malagasy <i>Brochoneura</i> (vernacular: mafotra, rara) has likewise been reported as an economically important group, with the species <i>B. acuminata</i> Warb. having uses ranging from construction to medicine (Bollen &amp; Donati in Oryx 40: 1–10. 2006; Onjalalaina &amp; al. in Forests 12(566): 1–20. 2021). The species <i>B. acuminata</i> is also known to have ecological significance. It is among the most abundant tree species encountered in the lowland tropical forests of eastern Madagascar, with an estimated density of 104 trees/ha recorded from southeast Madagascar (Campera &amp; al. in Land (Basel) 12(81): 1–20. 2023). In addition, <i>B. acuminata</i> has been reported to serve as an important food source for several species of lemurs including the southern wolly lemur (<i>Avahi meridionalis</i>) and Mittermeier's sportive lemur (<i>Lepilemur mittermeieri</i>), the former of which utilizes the tree as its second most preferred food item during the lean season (Balestri, Ecology and Conservation of the Southern Woolly Lemur (<i>Avahi meridionalis</i>) in the Tsitongambarika Protected Area, South-eastern Madagascar [Ph.D. dissertation, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford]. 2018; Wilmet &amp; al. in Lemur News 22: 26–30. 2020).</p>\\n<p>The names <i>Brochoneura</i> and <i>Cephalosphaera</i> appear widely in floristic literature and regional checklists (e.g., Ngumbau &amp; al. in PhytoKeys 147: 1. 2020). In the scientific literature, the names continue to be applied in their pre-2020 sense, even after the publication by Figueiredo &amp; Smith (e.g., Ndangalasi &amp; al. in PLoS ONE 16(5): e0250859. 2021; Raharisoa &amp; al. in J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 10: 104–109. 2021; Frost &amp; al. in J. Biogeogr. 49(1): 156–170. 2022; Cheek &amp; Luke in Kew Bull. 78: 469–497. 2023; and Lolila &amp; al. in PLoS ONE 18(3): e0282528. 2023). This demonstrates the well-established nature of the names among researchers across multiple fields.</p>\\n<p>Therefore, we believe the sudden swapping of the application of <i>Brochoneura</i> to the Tanzanian species after more than a century of use for Madagascar species will only result in confusion among researchers, taxonomists, and conservation biologists working in Madagascar and East Africa. To preserve nomenclatural stability, the names <i>Brochoneura</i> and <i>Cephalosphaera</i> should be retained in their former sense. This can be achieved by conserving <i>Brochoneura</i> with a Madagacar species name (<i>B. madagascariensis</i>) as type and, conserving <i>Cephalosphaera</i> to make it legitimate, as Warburg included the original type of <i>Brochoneura</i> in the protologue of <i>Cephalosphaera</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taxon\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taxon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taxon","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(3021) Brochoneura Warb.Ost-Afrikas C: 179.Jul 1895 [Myristic.], nom:B. madagascariensis (Lam.) Warb. (in Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 68: 234. Dec 1897) (Myristica madagascariensis Lam.), typ. cons. prop.(3022) Cephalosphaera Warb. in Bot.Jahrb.Syst.33: 383.13 Mar 1903 [Myristic.], nom:C. usambarensis (Warb.) Warb. (Brochoneura usambarensis Warb.).Myristicaceae 是泛热带被子植物科,包括 21 属和大约 500 种。最近,Figueiredo &amp; Smith (in Phytotaxa 456: 299-300. 2020) 提议更改 Brochoneura 和 Cephalosphaera 这两个属名的命名。在他们提出建议之前,Brochoneura 这个名称一直用于马达加斯加的一组三个物种(Sauquet in Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 351-368. 2004),而 Cephalosphaera 仅用于东非的一个物种。拟议的更改将使 Brochoneura 这一名称适用于东非种,而马达加斯加种群将更名为 Neobrochoneura Figueiredo &amp; Gideon F. Sm.Figueiredo &amp; Smith 提议的名称互换是在他们发现奥托-沃伯格(Otto Warburg)可能无意中进行了名称互换之后提出的,沃伯格最初将东非种命名为 Brochoneura(沃伯格在 Engler,Pflanzenw.Caes.Leop.-Carol.德国。Nat.Cur.68: 237.1897).后来,他为 Brochoneura 的原始模式 B. usambarensis 发表了单型的东非属 Cephalosphaera(沃伯格在 Bot. Jahrb. Syst.为了纠正沃伯格的这一千古错误,作者建议将 Brochoneura 恢复为单型的东非属,并给马达加斯加群一个新的名称--Neobrochoneura。虽然名称转换只影响了少数几个物种,但这并无益处,而且可能会造成混淆,尤其是 2020 年之前的名称已经在分类学和植物学文献中确立。马达加斯加类群使用 Brochoneura 这一名称已长达一个多世纪,而东非类群使用这一名称仅有八年时间,即从 1895 年到 1903 年。这两个属都有重要的经济用途。东非头尾杉(白话:mtambao)历来被视为具有经济价值的木材树种,至少从 20 世纪中期开始就被有选择性地砍伐(Waser &amp; al.Nat.Conserv.82(2):42-49.2013).20 世纪 60 年代,该树种被认为是 "最有用的多用途用材树种之一",20 世纪 70 年代,该树种成为胶合板的 "主要来源",最终导致其在 1985 年东乌桑巴拉山脉最重要木材清单中排名第八(Lemmens &amp; al.7: 199. 2012)。马达加斯加的 Brochoneura(白话:mafotra, rara)也同样被报道为一个具有重要经济价值的类群,其物种 B. acuminata Warb.具有从建筑到医药等多种用途(Bollen &amp; Donati in Oryx 40: 1-10.2006; Onjalalaina &amp; al. in Forests 12(566):1-20.2021).众所周知,B. acuminata 树种还具有重要的生态意义。它是马达加斯加东部低地热带森林中最丰富的树种之一,马达加斯加东南部记录的密度估计为 104 棵/公顷(Campera &amp; al. in Land (Basel) 12(81):1-20.2023).此外,B.acuminata是几种狐猴的重要食物来源,其中包括南方毛狐猴(Avahi meridionalis)和密特迈尔狐猴(Lepilemur mittermeieri),前者在枯萎季节将该树作为其第二大首选食物(Balestri,马达加斯加东南部Tsitongambarika保护区的南方毛狐猴(Avahi meridionalis)的生态学与保护 [Ph. D. dissertation, Oxford University Press.博士论文,牛津布鲁克斯大学,牛津]。2018; Wilmet &amp; al.2020 年)。Brochoneura 和 Cephalosphaera 这两个名称广泛出现在植物学文献和地区名录中(例如,Ngumbau &amp; al.)在科学文献中,即使在 Figueiredo &amp; Smith 发表文章之后,这些名称仍然沿用 2020 年之前的含义(例如,Ndangalasi &amp; al. in PLoS ONE 16(5): e0250859.2021; Raharisoa &amp; al. in J. Pharmacogn.Phytochem.10: 104-109.2021; Frost &amp; al. in J. Biogeogr:156-170.2022; Cheek &amp; Luke in Kew Bull.78: 469-497.2023; and Lolila &amp; al. in PLoS ONE 18(3): e0282528.2023).这表明,这些名称在多个领域的研究人员中已得到广泛认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(3021–3022) Proposals to conserve the names Brochoneura, with a conserved type, and Cephalosphaera (Myristicaceae)

(3021) Brochoneura Warb. in Engler, Pflanzenw. Ost-Afrikas C: 179. Jul 1895 [Myristic.], nom. cons. prop.

Typus: B. madagascariensis (Lam.) Warb. (in Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 68: 234. Dec 1897) (Myristica madagascariensis Lam.), typ. cons. prop.

(3022) Cephalosphaera Warb. in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 33: 383. 13 Mar 1903 [Myristic.], nom. cons. prop.

Typus: C. usambarensis (Warb.) Warb. (Brochoneura usambarensis Warb.).

Myristicaceae is a pantropical family of angiosperms comprising 21 genera and ca. 500 species. Recently, Figueiredo & Smith (in Phytotaxa 456: 299–300. 2020) proposed nomenclatural changes for the generic names Brochoneura and Cephalosphaera. Prior to their proposal, the name Brochoneura had been applied to a group of three species in Madagascar (Sauquet in Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 351–368. 2004) whereas Cephalosphaera was exclusively applied to a single East African species. The proposed changes would have the name Brochoneura instead applied to the East African species while the Malagasy group would be renamed Neobrochoneura Figueiredo & Gideon F. Sm. This proposed name swap by Figueiredo & Smith followed their discovery of what may have been an unintentional name swap made by Otto Warburg, who originally published the name Brochoneura for the East African species (Warburg in Engler, Pflanzenw. Ost-Afrikas C: 180. 1895) and subsequently expanded the genus to incorporate three Malagasy species originally included in Myristica (Warburg in Nova Acta Acad. Caes. Leop.-Carol. German. Nat. Cur. 68: 237. 1897). Later, he published the monotypic East African genus Cephalosphaera (Warburg in Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 33: 383. 1903) for B. usambarensis, the original type of Brochoneura, while restricting Brochoneura to the Malagasy group. To rectify this centuries-old error by Warburg, the authors proposed to have Brochoneura reinstated for the monotypic East African genus and give the Malagasy group a new name, Neobrochoneura.

Although the name switch only affects a handful of species, it is nonetheless not helpful and may result in confusion, especially since the names in their pre-2020 sense have become well-established in the taxonomic and floristic literature. The name Brochoneura has been applied to the Malagasy group for well over a century whereas it had only been applied to the East African taxon for a mere eight years, namely from 1895 to 1903. Both genera also have important economic uses.

The East African Cephalosphaera (vernacular: mtambao) has historically been regarded as an economically valuable timber species, having been selectively logged since at least the mid-20th century (Waser & al. in Tanzania J. Forest. Nat. Conserv. 82(2): 42–49. 2013). In the 1960s, it was noted as “one of the most useful multi-purpose timber trees” and in the 1970s, the species became a “major source” of plywood, eventually leading to it being ranked eighth on the list of most important timbers of the East Usambara Mountains in 1985 (Lemmens & al. in Pl. Resources Trop. Afr. 7: 199. 2012).

The Malagasy Brochoneura (vernacular: mafotra, rara) has likewise been reported as an economically important group, with the species B. acuminata Warb. having uses ranging from construction to medicine (Bollen & Donati in Oryx 40: 1–10. 2006; Onjalalaina & al. in Forests 12(566): 1–20. 2021). The species B. acuminata is also known to have ecological significance. It is among the most abundant tree species encountered in the lowland tropical forests of eastern Madagascar, with an estimated density of 104 trees/ha recorded from southeast Madagascar (Campera & al. in Land (Basel) 12(81): 1–20. 2023). In addition, B. acuminata has been reported to serve as an important food source for several species of lemurs including the southern wolly lemur (Avahi meridionalis) and Mittermeier's sportive lemur (Lepilemur mittermeieri), the former of which utilizes the tree as its second most preferred food item during the lean season (Balestri, Ecology and Conservation of the Southern Woolly Lemur (Avahi meridionalis) in the Tsitongambarika Protected Area, South-eastern Madagascar [Ph.D. dissertation, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford]. 2018; Wilmet & al. in Lemur News 22: 26–30. 2020).

The names Brochoneura and Cephalosphaera appear widely in floristic literature and regional checklists (e.g., Ngumbau & al. in PhytoKeys 147: 1. 2020). In the scientific literature, the names continue to be applied in their pre-2020 sense, even after the publication by Figueiredo & Smith (e.g., Ndangalasi & al. in PLoS ONE 16(5): e0250859. 2021; Raharisoa & al. in J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 10: 104–109. 2021; Frost & al. in J. Biogeogr. 49(1): 156–170. 2022; Cheek & Luke in Kew Bull. 78: 469–497. 2023; and Lolila & al. in PLoS ONE 18(3): e0282528. 2023). This demonstrates the well-established nature of the names among researchers across multiple fields.

Therefore, we believe the sudden swapping of the application of Brochoneura to the Tanzanian species after more than a century of use for Madagascar species will only result in confusion among researchers, taxonomists, and conservation biologists working in Madagascar and East Africa. To preserve nomenclatural stability, the names Brochoneura and Cephalosphaera should be retained in their former sense. This can be achieved by conserving Brochoneura with a Madagacar species name (B. madagascariensis) as type and, conserving Cephalosphaera to make it legitimate, as Warburg included the original type of Brochoneura in the protologue of Cephalosphaera.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Taxon
Taxon 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: TAXON is the bi-monthly journal of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy and is devoted to systematic and evolutionary biology with emphasis on plants and fungi. It is published bimonthly by the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, c/o Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. Details of page charges are given in the Guidelines for authors. Papers will be reviewed by at least two specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信