模仿真的是奉承吗？英国的贸易连续性协议：答复约里斯-拉里克

IF 1.8 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

European Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1093/ejil/chae012

Emanuel Castellarin

{"title":"模仿真的是奉承吗？英国的贸易连续性协议：答复约里斯-拉里克","authors":"Emanuel Castellarin","doi":"10.1093/ejil/chae012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of the United Kingdom’s (UK) trade continuity programme is open to debate. Joris Larik argues that this programme should be seen as a success both for the UK (although a ‘modest’ one) and for the European Union (EU). However, the significance of the UK’s trade continuity agreements should not be overstated, as the replication of the EU’s trade agreements seems to result above all from pragmatic considerations. It is submitted that this programme cannot be described as a success for the UK and only allows limited conclusions to be drawn about the external influence of the EU’s trade policy.","PeriodicalId":47727,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of International Law","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Imitation Really Flattery? The UK’s Trade Continuity Agreements: A Reply to Joris Larik\",\"authors\":\"Emanuel Castellarin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejil/chae012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assessment of the United Kingdom’s (UK) trade continuity programme is open to debate. Joris Larik argues that this programme should be seen as a success both for the UK (although a ‘modest’ one) and for the European Union (EU). However, the significance of the UK’s trade continuity agreements should not be overstated, as the replication of the EU’s trade agreements seems to result above all from pragmatic considerations. It is submitted that this programme cannot be described as a success for the UK and only allows limited conclusions to be drawn about the external influence of the EU’s trade policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对英国贸易连续性计划的评估值得商榷。约里斯-拉里克（Joris Larik）认为，该计划应被视为英国（尽管 "不大"）和欧盟（EU）的成功。然而，不应夸大英国贸易连续性协议的重要性，因为复制欧盟的贸易协议似乎首先是出于实用主义的考虑。本文认为，这一计划对英国来说不能说是成功的，只能就欧盟贸易政策的外部影响得出有限的结论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Is Imitation Really Flattery? The UK’s Trade Continuity Agreements: A Reply to Joris Larik

The assessment of the United Kingdom’s (UK) trade continuity programme is open to debate. Joris Larik argues that this programme should be seen as a success both for the UK (although a ‘modest’ one) and for the European Union (EU). However, the significance of the UK’s trade continuity agreements should not be overstated, as the replication of the EU’s trade agreements seems to result above all from pragmatic considerations. It is submitted that this programme cannot be described as a success for the UK and only allows limited conclusions to be drawn about the external influence of the EU’s trade policy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of International Law Multiple-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of International Law is firmly established as one of the world"s leading journals in its field. With its distinctive combination of theoretical and practical approaches to the issues of international law, the journal offers readers a unique opportunity to stay in touch with the latest developments in this rapidly evolving area. Each issue of the EJIL provides a forum for the exploration of the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of international law as well as for up-to-date analysis of topical issues. Additionally, it is the only journal to provide systematic coverage of the relationship between international law and the law of the European Union and its Member States.