挪威虎鲸的活动反映了其不同的猎物类型

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Emma F. Vogel, Audun H. Rikardsen, Marie-Anne Blanchet, Pierre Blévin, Martin Biuw
{"title":"挪威虎鲸的活动反映了其不同的猎物类型","authors":"Emma F. Vogel, Audun H. Rikardsen, Marie-Anne Blanchet, Pierre Blévin, Martin Biuw","doi":"10.33265/polar.v43.9840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Norwegian killer whales (<em>Orcinus orca</em>) are thought to be generalists that feed primarily on fish, but some individuals have been observed targeting pinnipeds. In the study reported here, field observations of foraging behaviours formed the basis of a priori classification as either&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<em>fish-eaters</em>. Concurrent collection of photographic identification and biopsies for stable isotope analysis were used to validate prey choice classification. We found through satellite tracking that whales classified as&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;took different paths south after leaving the northern fjords seemingly optimized for pinniped predation. Specifically, we found that&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;took paths that tightly followed the coastline, remaining on average 6.9 ± 10.7 km (mean ± SD,&nbsp;<em>n</em>&nbsp;= 315) from the coast, whereas&nbsp;<em>fish-eaters</em>&nbsp;moved offshore along the continental shelf, travelling on average 45.1 ± 30.2 km (<em>n</em>&nbsp;= 1534) from the coast. We also found that, compared to&nbsp;<em>fish-eaters</em>,&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;displayed more movements directed towards harbour seal haul-outs (<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.001). As expected, our data suggest that the&nbsp;<em>fish-eaters</em>&nbsp;feed primarily on fish, whilst&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;appear to opportunistically use diverse foraging strategies optimized for either fish or seals based on availability and preference. Our findings demonstrate that tracking data can elucidate Norwegian killer whale movements associated with different prey types and selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49684,"journal":{"name":"Polar Research","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Norwegian killer whale movements reflect their different prey types\",\"authors\":\"Emma F. Vogel, Audun H. Rikardsen, Marie-Anne Blanchet, Pierre Blévin, Martin Biuw\",\"doi\":\"10.33265/polar.v43.9840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Norwegian killer whales (<em>Orcinus orca</em>) are thought to be generalists that feed primarily on fish, but some individuals have been observed targeting pinnipeds. In the study reported here, field observations of foraging behaviours formed the basis of a priori classification as either&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<em>fish-eaters</em>. Concurrent collection of photographic identification and biopsies for stable isotope analysis were used to validate prey choice classification. We found through satellite tracking that whales classified as&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;took different paths south after leaving the northern fjords seemingly optimized for pinniped predation. Specifically, we found that&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;took paths that tightly followed the coastline, remaining on average 6.9 ± 10.7 km (mean ± SD,&nbsp;<em>n</em>&nbsp;= 315) from the coast, whereas&nbsp;<em>fish-eaters</em>&nbsp;moved offshore along the continental shelf, travelling on average 45.1 ± 30.2 km (<em>n</em>&nbsp;= 1534) from the coast. We also found that, compared to&nbsp;<em>fish-eaters</em>,&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;displayed more movements directed towards harbour seal haul-outs (<em>p</em>&nbsp;= 0.001). As expected, our data suggest that the&nbsp;<em>fish-eaters</em>&nbsp;feed primarily on fish, whilst&nbsp;<em>seal-eaters</em>&nbsp;appear to opportunistically use diverse foraging strategies optimized for either fish or seals based on availability and preference. Our findings demonstrate that tracking data can elucidate Norwegian killer whale movements associated with different prey types and selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar Research\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v43.9840\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v43.9840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

挪威虎鲸(Orcinus orca)被认为是主要以鱼类为食的通食性动物,但也观察到一些个体以鳍足类动物为食。在本文报告的研究中,对觅食行为的实地观察构成了将虎鲸先验分类为食海豹或食鱼类的基础。同时收集的照片鉴定和用于稳定同位素分析的活体组织被用来验证猎物选择分类。我们通过卫星跟踪发现,被归类为食海豹鲸的鲸鱼在离开北部峡湾后会选择不同的路径南下,而北部峡湾似乎是捕食针鱼的最佳地点。具体来说,我们发现 食海豹鲸 的路径紧贴海岸线,平均距离海岸 6.9 ± 10.7 千米(平均值 ± 标差,n = 315),而 食鱼鲸 则沿着大陆架向近海移动,平均距离海岸 45.1 ± 30.2 千米(n = 1534)。我们还发现,与食鱼类动物相比,食海豹类动物更多地向海豹栖息地移动(p = 0.001)。正如预期的那样,我们的数据表明,食鱼者主要以鱼为食,而食海豹者似乎根据鱼类或海豹的可得性和偏好,伺机使用多种觅食策略。我们的研究结果表明,跟踪数据可以阐明与不同猎物类型和选择相关的挪威虎鲸活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Norwegian killer whale movements reflect their different prey types

Norwegian killer whales (Orcinus orca) are thought to be generalists that feed primarily on fish, but some individuals have been observed targeting pinnipeds. In the study reported here, field observations of foraging behaviours formed the basis of a priori classification as either seal-eaters or fish-eaters. Concurrent collection of photographic identification and biopsies for stable isotope analysis were used to validate prey choice classification. We found through satellite tracking that whales classified as seal-eaters took different paths south after leaving the northern fjords seemingly optimized for pinniped predation. Specifically, we found that seal-eaters took paths that tightly followed the coastline, remaining on average 6.9 ± 10.7 km (mean ± SD, n = 315) from the coast, whereas fish-eaters moved offshore along the continental shelf, travelling on average 45.1 ± 30.2 km (n = 1534) from the coast. We also found that, compared to fish-eatersseal-eaters displayed more movements directed towards harbour seal haul-outs (p = 0.001). As expected, our data suggest that the fish-eaters feed primarily on fish, whilst seal-eaters appear to opportunistically use diverse foraging strategies optimized for either fish or seals based on availability and preference. Our findings demonstrate that tracking data can elucidate Norwegian killer whale movements associated with different prey types and selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polar Research
Polar Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 1982, Polar Research has been the international, peer-reviewed journal of the Norwegian Polar Institute, Norway''s central institution for research, environmental monitoring and mapping of the polar regions. Aiming to promote the exchange of scientific knowledge about the Arctic and Antarctic across disciplinary boundaries, Polar Research serves an international community of researchers and managers. As an open-access journal, Polar Research makes its contents freely available to the general public. Original primary research papers comprise the mainstay of Polar Research. Review articles, brief research notes, letters to the editor and book reviews are also included. Special issues are published from time to time. The scope of Polar Research encompasses research in all scientific disciplines relevant to the polar regions. These include, but are not limited to, the subfields of biology, ecology, geology, oceanography, glaciology and atmospheric science. Submissions from the social sciences and those focusing on polar management and policy issues are welcome. Contributions about Antarctica are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信