局部富血小板血浆和正常生理盐水敷料与全接触式石膏治疗糖尿病足溃疡的比较--随机对照试验

Subha Das, Sanyal Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Anjani Kumar, Niraj Kumar, Ranjeet Kumar
{"title":"局部富血小板血浆和正常生理盐水敷料与全接触式石膏治疗糖尿病足溃疡的比较--随机对照试验","authors":"Subha Das, Sanyal Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Anjani Kumar, Niraj Kumar, Ranjeet Kumar","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.20.24304330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Wound care, which includes cleaning and fostering a moist wound healing environment, play a crucial role in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.. Total-contact casts are widely used as the most effective external technique for off-loading plantar ulcers. This study compared the effectiveness of PRP and normal saline dressings in conjunction with TCC. Methods 36 patients with diabetic foot ulcers were divided into two groups using computer generated randomization into PRP and NS groups with 18 patients in each group. The PRP group was given autologous PRP, and the NS group was given wet dressing with NS, following which TCC was applied in each case for off-loading. Follow-up was performed every 15 days for 90 days. In each follow-up measurement and TCC application, the time to heal and PUSH score was used to measure the condition of the wound. Results\nIn the PRP group, the mean wound size 8.28 SD 1.18 and the mean Push tool total 13.44 SD 0.98 at base line which gradually decreased, and finally, on day 90, it was reduced to 0.61 SD 1.20 and 1.89 SD 3.68, respectively. In NS group the mean wound size 8.45 SD 1.13 and mean Push tool total 13.50 SD 0.92 at baseline which was gradually decreased and finally at day 90 it was reduced to 1.58 SD 1.55 and 4.61 SD 4.37 respectively. A significant difference was observed in both groups during the final evaluation. Compared with the NS group, the PRP group showed greater improvement. Conclusion Both autologous PRP and NS are effective in treating DFU, when used along with TCC. However, PRP therapy is better at reducing the healing time and hospital visits.","PeriodicalId":501419,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between topical Platelet Rich Plasma and Normal Saline dressing, in conjunction with Total Contact Casting in Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer- a Randomized Control Trial\",\"authors\":\"Subha Das, Sanyal Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Anjani Kumar, Niraj Kumar, Ranjeet Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.20.24304330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Wound care, which includes cleaning and fostering a moist wound healing environment, play a crucial role in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.. Total-contact casts are widely used as the most effective external technique for off-loading plantar ulcers. This study compared the effectiveness of PRP and normal saline dressings in conjunction with TCC. Methods 36 patients with diabetic foot ulcers were divided into two groups using computer generated randomization into PRP and NS groups with 18 patients in each group. The PRP group was given autologous PRP, and the NS group was given wet dressing with NS, following which TCC was applied in each case for off-loading. Follow-up was performed every 15 days for 90 days. In each follow-up measurement and TCC application, the time to heal and PUSH score was used to measure the condition of the wound. Results\\nIn the PRP group, the mean wound size 8.28 SD 1.18 and the mean Push tool total 13.44 SD 0.98 at base line which gradually decreased, and finally, on day 90, it was reduced to 0.61 SD 1.20 and 1.89 SD 3.68, respectively. In NS group the mean wound size 8.45 SD 1.13 and mean Push tool total 13.50 SD 0.92 at baseline which was gradually decreased and finally at day 90 it was reduced to 1.58 SD 1.55 and 4.61 SD 4.37 respectively. A significant difference was observed in both groups during the final evaluation. Compared with the NS group, the PRP group showed greater improvement. Conclusion Both autologous PRP and NS are effective in treating DFU, when used along with TCC. However, PRP therapy is better at reducing the healing time and hospital visits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.20.24304330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.20.24304330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 伤口护理包括清洁和营造湿润的伤口愈合环境,在糖尿病足溃疡的治疗中起着至关重要的作用。全接触式石膏被广泛用作足底溃疡最有效的外部负重技术。本研究比较了 PRP 和生理盐水敷料与全接触式敷料的效果。方法 36 名糖尿病足溃疡患者被随机分为 PRP 组和 NS 组,每组 18 人。PRP 组使用自体 PRP,NS 组使用 NS 湿敷,然后在每个病例中使用 TCC 进行卸载。每 15 天进行一次随访,为期 90 天。在每次随访测量和使用 TCC 时,均使用愈合时间和 PUSH 评分来衡量伤口状况。结果 在 PRP 组,基线时的平均伤口大小为 8.28 SD 1.18,平均 Push 工具总数为 13.44 SD 0.98,随后逐渐减小,最后在第 90 天分别减小到 0.61 SD 1.20 和 1.89 SD 3.68。在 NS 组中,基线时的平均伤口大小为 8.45 SD 1.13,平均推动工具总数为 13.50 SD 0.92,随后逐渐减少,最后在第 90 天分别减少到 1.58 SD 1.55 和 4.61 SD 4.37。在最终评估中,两组均有明显差异。与 NS 组相比,PRP 组的改善程度更大。结论 如果与 TCC 同时使用,自体 PRP 和 NS 都能有效治疗 DFU。不过,PRP疗法在缩短愈合时间和减少住院次数方面更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between topical Platelet Rich Plasma and Normal Saline dressing, in conjunction with Total Contact Casting in Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer- a Randomized Control Trial
Introduction Wound care, which includes cleaning and fostering a moist wound healing environment, play a crucial role in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.. Total-contact casts are widely used as the most effective external technique for off-loading plantar ulcers. This study compared the effectiveness of PRP and normal saline dressings in conjunction with TCC. Methods 36 patients with diabetic foot ulcers were divided into two groups using computer generated randomization into PRP and NS groups with 18 patients in each group. The PRP group was given autologous PRP, and the NS group was given wet dressing with NS, following which TCC was applied in each case for off-loading. Follow-up was performed every 15 days for 90 days. In each follow-up measurement and TCC application, the time to heal and PUSH score was used to measure the condition of the wound. Results In the PRP group, the mean wound size 8.28 SD 1.18 and the mean Push tool total 13.44 SD 0.98 at base line which gradually decreased, and finally, on day 90, it was reduced to 0.61 SD 1.20 and 1.89 SD 3.68, respectively. In NS group the mean wound size 8.45 SD 1.13 and mean Push tool total 13.50 SD 0.92 at baseline which was gradually decreased and finally at day 90 it was reduced to 1.58 SD 1.55 and 4.61 SD 4.37 respectively. A significant difference was observed in both groups during the final evaluation. Compared with the NS group, the PRP group showed greater improvement. Conclusion Both autologous PRP and NS are effective in treating DFU, when used along with TCC. However, PRP therapy is better at reducing the healing time and hospital visits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信