MRSA 定植(根除无活动性侵袭感染者的定植)。

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2015-11-13
Suzanne F Bradley
{"title":"MRSA 定植(根除无活动性侵袭感染者的定植)。","authors":"Suzanne F Bradley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contains a gene that makes it resistant to methicillin as well as to other beta-lactam antibiotics, including flucloxacillin, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. MRSA can be part of the normal body flora (colonisation), especially in the nose, but it can cause infection. Until recently, MRSA has primarily been a problem associated with exposure to the healthcare system, especially in people with prolonged hospital admissions or underlying disease, or after antibiotic use. In many countries worldwide, a preponderance of S aureus bloodstream isolates are resistant to methicillin.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatment for MRSA nasal or extra-nasal colonisation in adults? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 850 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 356 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 273 studies, and the further review of 83 full publications. Of the 83 full articles evaluated, no studies were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for three PICO combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for five interventions based on information about the effectiveness and safety of antiseptic body washes, chlorhexidine-neomycin nasal cream, mupirocin nasal ointment, systemic antimicrobials, and other topical antimicrobials.</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRSA colonisation (eradicating colonisation in people without active invasive infection).\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne F Bradley\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contains a gene that makes it resistant to methicillin as well as to other beta-lactam antibiotics, including flucloxacillin, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. MRSA can be part of the normal body flora (colonisation), especially in the nose, but it can cause infection. Until recently, MRSA has primarily been a problem associated with exposure to the healthcare system, especially in people with prolonged hospital admissions or underlying disease, or after antibiotic use. In many countries worldwide, a preponderance of S aureus bloodstream isolates are resistant to methicillin.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatment for MRSA nasal or extra-nasal colonisation in adults? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 850 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 356 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 273 studies, and the further review of 83 full publications. Of the 83 full articles evaluated, no studies were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for three PICO combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for five interventions based on information about the effectiveness and safety of antiseptic body washes, chlorhexidine-neomycin nasal cream, mupirocin nasal ointment, systemic antimicrobials, and other topical antimicrobials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4643830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ clinical evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)含有一种基因,可使其对甲氧西林以及其他β-内酰胺类抗生素(包括氟氯西林、头孢菌素和碳青霉烯类)产生耐药性。MRSA 可能是人体正常菌群(定植)的一部分,尤其是在鼻腔,但它也可能引起感染。直到最近,MRSA 主要还是一个与接触医疗系统有关的问题,尤其是在长期住院或患有基础疾病的人群中,或在使用抗生素后。在全球许多国家,大部分金黄色葡萄球菌血流分离株对甲氧西林具有耐药性:我们进行了一项系统性综述,旨在回答以下临床问题:成人 MRSA 鼻腔或鼻腔外定植的治疗效果如何?我们检索了Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library 和其他重要数据库,截至 2014 年 6 月(临床证据综述会定期更新;请在我们的网站上查看本综述的最新版本):在本次更新中,电子数据库共检索到 850 项研究。经重复数据删除和会议摘要去除后,筛选出 356 条记录纳入本综述。通过对标题和摘要的评估,排除了 273 项研究,并对 83 篇全文进行了进一步审查。在已评估的 83 篇完整文章中,本次更新没有新增任何研究。我们对三种 PICO 组合进行了 GRADE 评估:在本系统综述中,我们根据有关抗菌沐浴露、洗必泰-新霉素鼻膏、莫匹罗星鼻软膏、全身用抗菌药和其他局部用抗菌药的有效性和安全性的信息,对五种干预措施的疗效进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRSA colonisation (eradicating colonisation in people without active invasive infection).

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contains a gene that makes it resistant to methicillin as well as to other beta-lactam antibiotics, including flucloxacillin, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. MRSA can be part of the normal body flora (colonisation), especially in the nose, but it can cause infection. Until recently, MRSA has primarily been a problem associated with exposure to the healthcare system, especially in people with prolonged hospital admissions or underlying disease, or after antibiotic use. In many countries worldwide, a preponderance of S aureus bloodstream isolates are resistant to methicillin.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatment for MRSA nasal or extra-nasal colonisation in adults? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).

Results: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 850 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 356 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 273 studies, and the further review of 83 full publications. Of the 83 full articles evaluated, no studies were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for three PICO combinations.

Conclusions: In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for five interventions based on information about the effectiveness and safety of antiseptic body washes, chlorhexidine-neomycin nasal cream, mupirocin nasal ointment, systemic antimicrobials, and other topical antimicrobials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信