Kelsey M. Owsley PhD, MPH, Saleema A. Karim PhD, MHA, MBA
{"title":"社区社会脆弱性与 340B 药品定价计划:评估关键通道医院参与 340B 计划的预测因素。","authors":"Kelsey M. Owsley PhD, MPH, Saleema A. Karim PhD, MHA, MBA","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The federal 340B Drug Pricing Program allows eligible hospitals, including critical access hospitals (CAHs), to obtain outpatient drugs at a discounted rate. CAHs likely benefit from 340B participation because they are often under-resourced and serve at-risk patient populations. The objective of this study was to understand predictors of 340B program participation among CAHs, and how participation varies with community-level social vulnerability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used a cross-sectional study design to assess the relationship between 340B participation in 2019 and community vulnerability status using 2018 data from the CDC's social vulnerability index (SVI) among acute care CAHs. Analyses used linear probability models adjusted for hospital-level characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>In bivariate analyses, CAHs participating in the 340B program had lower overall social vulnerability scores, relative to nonparticipating, eligible, and ineligible CAHs, respectively (43.8 vs. 48.7 vs. 64.7, <i>p</i> < 0.10). In adjusted regression models, greater community vulnerability rankings due to socioeconomic status (–0.129, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and minority status and language (–0.092, <i>p</i> < 0.05) were associated with decreased 340B participation. Higher hospital operating margin was associated with increased 340B participation (0.163, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Although the number of for-profit CAHs ineligible for 340B was small, they had the highest community-level social vulnerability score and lowest hospital operating margin on average.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CAHs located in areas of high community vulnerability are less likely to participate in the 340B program. Some vulnerable patient populations served by CAHs may be excluded from 340B program benefits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community social vulnerability and the 340B Drug Pricing Program: Evaluating predictors of 340B participation among critical access hospital\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey M. Owsley PhD, MPH, Saleema A. Karim PhD, MHA, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The federal 340B Drug Pricing Program allows eligible hospitals, including critical access hospitals (CAHs), to obtain outpatient drugs at a discounted rate. CAHs likely benefit from 340B participation because they are often under-resourced and serve at-risk patient populations. The objective of this study was to understand predictors of 340B program participation among CAHs, and how participation varies with community-level social vulnerability.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used a cross-sectional study design to assess the relationship between 340B participation in 2019 and community vulnerability status using 2018 data from the CDC's social vulnerability index (SVI) among acute care CAHs. Analyses used linear probability models adjusted for hospital-level characteristics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>In bivariate analyses, CAHs participating in the 340B program had lower overall social vulnerability scores, relative to nonparticipating, eligible, and ineligible CAHs, respectively (43.8 vs. 48.7 vs. 64.7, <i>p</i> < 0.10). In adjusted regression models, greater community vulnerability rankings due to socioeconomic status (–0.129, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and minority status and language (–0.092, <i>p</i> < 0.05) were associated with decreased 340B participation. Higher hospital operating margin was associated with increased 340B participation (0.163, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Although the number of for-profit CAHs ineligible for 340B was small, they had the highest community-level social vulnerability score and lowest hospital operating margin on average.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>CAHs located in areas of high community vulnerability are less likely to participate in the 340B program. Some vulnerable patient populations served by CAHs may be excluded from 340B program benefits.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Community social vulnerability and the 340B Drug Pricing Program: Evaluating predictors of 340B participation among critical access hospital
Purpose
The federal 340B Drug Pricing Program allows eligible hospitals, including critical access hospitals (CAHs), to obtain outpatient drugs at a discounted rate. CAHs likely benefit from 340B participation because they are often under-resourced and serve at-risk patient populations. The objective of this study was to understand predictors of 340B program participation among CAHs, and how participation varies with community-level social vulnerability.
Methods
We used a cross-sectional study design to assess the relationship between 340B participation in 2019 and community vulnerability status using 2018 data from the CDC's social vulnerability index (SVI) among acute care CAHs. Analyses used linear probability models adjusted for hospital-level characteristics.
Findings
In bivariate analyses, CAHs participating in the 340B program had lower overall social vulnerability scores, relative to nonparticipating, eligible, and ineligible CAHs, respectively (43.8 vs. 48.7 vs. 64.7, p < 0.10). In adjusted regression models, greater community vulnerability rankings due to socioeconomic status (–0.129, p < 0.05) and minority status and language (–0.092, p < 0.05) were associated with decreased 340B participation. Higher hospital operating margin was associated with increased 340B participation (0.163, p < 0.05). Although the number of for-profit CAHs ineligible for 340B was small, they had the highest community-level social vulnerability score and lowest hospital operating margin on average.
Conclusions
CAHs located in areas of high community vulnerability are less likely to participate in the 340B program. Some vulnerable patient populations served by CAHs may be excluded from 340B program benefits.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.