气垫鞋的功能评估以及根据体重组确定最佳厚度的方法

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Seungnam Min , Murali Subramaniyam , Heeran Lee
{"title":"气垫鞋的功能评估以及根据体重组确定最佳厚度的方法","authors":"Seungnam Min ,&nbsp;Murali Subramaniyam ,&nbsp;Heeran Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the effectiveness of four air insoles with varying thicknesses and one typical insole by measuring the total muscle activity, total muscle fatigue, left/right foot pressure symmetry ratio, and subjective fatigue among participants in three weight groups (&lt;50, 50–70, and &gt;70 kg). To minimize cumulative fatigue among participants, only one type of insole was tested per day. The 0.6- to 1.0-cm thick air insoles have a positive impact on muscle activity, muscle fatigue, and subjective fatigue compared to the typical 0.8-cm insoles. In terms of subjective fatigue, the 0.6-, 1.0-, and 1.2-cm air insoles yielded lower fatigue levels in the &lt;50 kg group; however, the 50–70 kg group exhibited the lowest fatigue level when wearing the 0.8-cm air insoles. The proposed methodology may provide reference for optimal air insole thickness for users of varying weight ranges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional evaluation of air insoles and methodology for determining the optimal thickness according to weight group\",\"authors\":\"Seungnam Min ,&nbsp;Murali Subramaniyam ,&nbsp;Heeran Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study evaluates the effectiveness of four air insoles with varying thicknesses and one typical insole by measuring the total muscle activity, total muscle fatigue, left/right foot pressure symmetry ratio, and subjective fatigue among participants in three weight groups (&lt;50, 50–70, and &gt;70 kg). To minimize cumulative fatigue among participants, only one type of insole was tested per day. The 0.6- to 1.0-cm thick air insoles have a positive impact on muscle activity, muscle fatigue, and subjective fatigue compared to the typical 0.8-cm insoles. In terms of subjective fatigue, the 0.6-, 1.0-, and 1.2-cm air insoles yielded lower fatigue levels in the &lt;50 kg group; however, the 50–70 kg group exhibited the lowest fatigue level when wearing the 0.8-cm air insoles. The proposed methodology may provide reference for optimal air insole thickness for users of varying weight ranges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000386\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过测量三个体重组(50 千克、50-70 千克和 70 千克)参与者的总肌肉活动、总肌肉疲劳、左右脚压力对称比和主观疲劳度,评估了四种不同厚度的气垫鞋垫和一种典型鞋垫的效果。为了尽量减少参与者的累积疲劳,每天只测试一种鞋垫。与一般的 0.8 厘米鞋垫相比,0.6 至 1.0 厘米厚的气垫鞋垫对肌肉活动、肌肉疲劳和主观疲劳有积极影响。在主观疲劳方面,0.6 厘米、1.0 厘米和 1.2 厘米厚的气垫鞋垫在 50 公斤组的疲劳程度较低;然而,50-70 公斤组在穿着 0.8 厘米厚的气垫鞋垫时的疲劳程度最低。建议的方法可为不同体重范围的使用者提供最佳气垫鞋垫厚度的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional evaluation of air insoles and methodology for determining the optimal thickness according to weight group

This study evaluates the effectiveness of four air insoles with varying thicknesses and one typical insole by measuring the total muscle activity, total muscle fatigue, left/right foot pressure symmetry ratio, and subjective fatigue among participants in three weight groups (<50, 50–70, and >70 kg). To minimize cumulative fatigue among participants, only one type of insole was tested per day. The 0.6- to 1.0-cm thick air insoles have a positive impact on muscle activity, muscle fatigue, and subjective fatigue compared to the typical 0.8-cm insoles. In terms of subjective fatigue, the 0.6-, 1.0-, and 1.2-cm air insoles yielded lower fatigue levels in the <50 kg group; however, the 50–70 kg group exhibited the lowest fatigue level when wearing the 0.8-cm air insoles. The proposed methodology may provide reference for optimal air insole thickness for users of varying weight ranges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信