Sriram Ramgopal, Remle P Crowe, Lindsay Jaeger, Jennifer Fishe, Michelle L Macy, Christian Martin-Gill
{"title":"通过儿童机会指数来衡量紧急医疗服务中遇到的儿童患者的严重程度。","authors":"Sriram Ramgopal, Remle P Crowe, Lindsay Jaeger, Jennifer Fishe, Michelle L Macy, Christian Martin-Gill","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2333493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Children have differing utilization of emergency medical services (EMS) by socioeconomic status. We evaluated differences in prehospital care among children by the Child Opportunity Index (COI), the agreement between a child's COI at the scene and at home, and in-hospital outcomes for children by COI. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective study of pediatric (<18 years) scene encounters from approximately 2,000 United States EMS agencies from the 2021-2022 ESO Data Collaborative. We evaluated socioeconomic status using the multi-dimensional COI v2.0 at the scene. We described EMS interventions and in-hospital outcomes by COI categories using ordinal regression. We evaluated the agreement between the home and scene COI. <b>Results:</b> Data were available for 99.8% of pediatric scene runs, with 936,940 included EMS responses. Children from lower COI areas more frequently had a response occurring at home (62.9% in Very Low COI areas; 47.1% in Very High COI areas). Children from higher COI areas were more frequently not transported to the hospital (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.87). Children in lower COI areas had lower use of physical (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.33) and chemical (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.29-1.55) restraints for behavioral health problems. Among injured children with elevated pain scores (≥7), analgesia was provided more frequently to children in higher COI areas (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.65-1.81). The proportion of children in cardiac arrest was lowest from higher COI areas. Among 107,114 encounters with in-hospital data, the odds of hospitalization was higher among children from higher COI areas (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.18) and was lower for in-hospital mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.85). Home and scene COI had a strong agreement (Kendall's <i>W</i> = 0.81). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patterns of EMS utilization among children with prehospital emergencies differ by COI. Some measures, such as for in-hospital mortality, occurred more frequently among children transported from Very Low COI areas, whereas others, such as admission, occurred more frequently among children from Very High COI areas. These findings have implications in EMS planning and in alternative out-of-hospital care models, including in regional placement of ambulance stations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measures of Patient Acuity Among Children Encountered by Emergency Medical Services by the Child Opportunity Index.\",\"authors\":\"Sriram Ramgopal, Remle P Crowe, Lindsay Jaeger, Jennifer Fishe, Michelle L Macy, Christian Martin-Gill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2333493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Children have differing utilization of emergency medical services (EMS) by socioeconomic status. We evaluated differences in prehospital care among children by the Child Opportunity Index (COI), the agreement between a child's COI at the scene and at home, and in-hospital outcomes for children by COI. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective study of pediatric (<18 years) scene encounters from approximately 2,000 United States EMS agencies from the 2021-2022 ESO Data Collaborative. We evaluated socioeconomic status using the multi-dimensional COI v2.0 at the scene. We described EMS interventions and in-hospital outcomes by COI categories using ordinal regression. We evaluated the agreement between the home and scene COI. <b>Results:</b> Data were available for 99.8% of pediatric scene runs, with 936,940 included EMS responses. Children from lower COI areas more frequently had a response occurring at home (62.9% in Very Low COI areas; 47.1% in Very High COI areas). Children from higher COI areas were more frequently not transported to the hospital (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.87). Children in lower COI areas had lower use of physical (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.33) and chemical (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.29-1.55) restraints for behavioral health problems. Among injured children with elevated pain scores (≥7), analgesia was provided more frequently to children in higher COI areas (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.65-1.81). The proportion of children in cardiac arrest was lowest from higher COI areas. Among 107,114 encounters with in-hospital data, the odds of hospitalization was higher among children from higher COI areas (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.18) and was lower for in-hospital mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.85). Home and scene COI had a strong agreement (Kendall's <i>W</i> = 0.81). <b>Conclusion:</b> Patterns of EMS utilization among children with prehospital emergencies differ by COI. Some measures, such as for in-hospital mortality, occurred more frequently among children transported from Very Low COI areas, whereas others, such as admission, occurred more frequently among children from Very High COI areas. These findings have implications in EMS planning and in alternative out-of-hospital care models, including in regional placement of ambulance stations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2333493\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2333493","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景。不同社会经济地位的儿童对紧急医疗服务(EMS)的利用率不同。我们按儿童机会指数(COI)评估了儿童院前护理的差异、儿童在现场和家中的机会指数之间的一致性,以及按机会指数评估的儿童院内治疗效果。我们对儿科(结果。99.8%的儿科现场运行数据可用,其中包括 936 940 次急救响应。COI 较低地区的儿童更常在家中接受急救(COI 非常低的地区为 62.9%;COI 非常高的地区为 47.1%)。COI 较高地区的儿童更经常未被送往医院(几率比 [OR] 0.87,95% 置信区间 [CI]0.86-0.87)。COI 较低地区的儿童因行为健康问题而使用物理约束(OR 1.23,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.13-1.33)和化学约束(OR 1.41,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.29-1.55)的比例较低。在疼痛评分升高(≥7 分)的受伤儿童中,COI 较高地区的儿童更常接受镇痛治疗(OR 1.73,95% CI 1.65-1.81)。COI较高地区的儿童心脏骤停比例最低。在 107,114 次住院数据中,COI 较高地区儿童的住院比例较高(OR 1.14,95% CI 1.11-1.18),住院死亡率较低(OR 0.75,95% CI 0.65-0.85)。家庭和现场 COI 具有很高的一致性(Kendall's W = 0.81)。院前急救儿童使用急救服务的模式因COI而异。有些指标,如院内死亡率,在极低 COI 地区转运的儿童中出现得更频繁,而其他指标,如入院,在极高 COI 地区转运的儿童中出现得更频繁。这些发现对紧急医疗服务规划和院外护理替代模式(包括救护站的区域布局)都有影响。
Measures of Patient Acuity Among Children Encountered by Emergency Medical Services by the Child Opportunity Index.
Background: Children have differing utilization of emergency medical services (EMS) by socioeconomic status. We evaluated differences in prehospital care among children by the Child Opportunity Index (COI), the agreement between a child's COI at the scene and at home, and in-hospital outcomes for children by COI. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of pediatric (<18 years) scene encounters from approximately 2,000 United States EMS agencies from the 2021-2022 ESO Data Collaborative. We evaluated socioeconomic status using the multi-dimensional COI v2.0 at the scene. We described EMS interventions and in-hospital outcomes by COI categories using ordinal regression. We evaluated the agreement between the home and scene COI. Results: Data were available for 99.8% of pediatric scene runs, with 936,940 included EMS responses. Children from lower COI areas more frequently had a response occurring at home (62.9% in Very Low COI areas; 47.1% in Very High COI areas). Children from higher COI areas were more frequently not transported to the hospital (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.87). Children in lower COI areas had lower use of physical (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.33) and chemical (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.29-1.55) restraints for behavioral health problems. Among injured children with elevated pain scores (≥7), analgesia was provided more frequently to children in higher COI areas (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.65-1.81). The proportion of children in cardiac arrest was lowest from higher COI areas. Among 107,114 encounters with in-hospital data, the odds of hospitalization was higher among children from higher COI areas (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.18) and was lower for in-hospital mortality (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.85). Home and scene COI had a strong agreement (Kendall's W = 0.81). Conclusion: Patterns of EMS utilization among children with prehospital emergencies differ by COI. Some measures, such as for in-hospital mortality, occurred more frequently among children transported from Very Low COI areas, whereas others, such as admission, occurred more frequently among children from Very High COI areas. These findings have implications in EMS planning and in alternative out-of-hospital care models, including in regional placement of ambulance stations.
期刊介绍:
Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.