Jana L Hirschtick, Jennifer L Walsh, Wayne DiFranceisco, Jacquelyn Jacobs, Bijou Hunt, Jesus Valencia, Katherine Quinn
{"title":"芝加哥黑人成年人中可信赖的信息来源和 COVID-19 疫苗接种情况。","authors":"Jana L Hirschtick, Jennifer L Walsh, Wayne DiFranceisco, Jacquelyn Jacobs, Bijou Hunt, Jesus Valencia, Katherine Quinn","doi":"10.1177/08901171241240529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Examine trust in sources of COVID-19 information and vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Chicago, Illinois.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Convenience sample of 538 Black adults surveyed between September 2021 and March 2022.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Trust in sources of COVID-19 information, COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Using latent class analysis, we identified classes of trust in sources of COVID-19 information. We considered predictors of class membership using multinomial logistic regression and examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between trust class membership and COVID-19 vaccination while accounting for uncertainty in class assignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analytic sample (n = 522) was predominantly aged 18-34 (52%) and female (71%). Results suggested a four-class solution: (1) low trust, (2) high trust in all sources, (3) high trust in doctor and government, and (4) high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family. Unadjusted odds of vaccination were greater in the high trust in all sources (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2), high trust in doctor and government (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.3), and high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family classes (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.9) than the low trust class. However, these associations were not significant after adjustment for sociodemographic and health status factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although COVID-19 vaccination varied across trust classes, our adjusted findings do not suggest a direct association between trust and vaccination, reflecting complexities in the vaccine decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"942-953"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trusted Sources of Information and COVID-19 Vaccination Among Black Adults in Chicago.\",\"authors\":\"Jana L Hirschtick, Jennifer L Walsh, Wayne DiFranceisco, Jacquelyn Jacobs, Bijou Hunt, Jesus Valencia, Katherine Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171241240529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Examine trust in sources of COVID-19 information and vaccination status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Chicago, Illinois.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Convenience sample of 538 Black adults surveyed between September 2021 and March 2022.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Trust in sources of COVID-19 information, COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Using latent class analysis, we identified classes of trust in sources of COVID-19 information. We considered predictors of class membership using multinomial logistic regression and examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between trust class membership and COVID-19 vaccination while accounting for uncertainty in class assignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analytic sample (n = 522) was predominantly aged 18-34 (52%) and female (71%). Results suggested a four-class solution: (1) low trust, (2) high trust in all sources, (3) high trust in doctor and government, and (4) high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family. Unadjusted odds of vaccination were greater in the high trust in all sources (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2), high trust in doctor and government (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.3), and high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family classes (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.9) than the low trust class. However, these associations were not significant after adjustment for sociodemographic and health status factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although COVID-19 vaccination varied across trust classes, our adjusted findings do not suggest a direct association between trust and vaccination, reflecting complexities in the vaccine decision-making process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"942-953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241240529\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241240529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trusted Sources of Information and COVID-19 Vaccination Among Black Adults in Chicago.
Purpose: Examine trust in sources of COVID-19 information and vaccination status.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Setting: Chicago, Illinois.
Subjects: Convenience sample of 538 Black adults surveyed between September 2021 and March 2022.
Measures: Trust in sources of COVID-19 information, COVID-19 vaccination.
Analysis: Using latent class analysis, we identified classes of trust in sources of COVID-19 information. We considered predictors of class membership using multinomial logistic regression and examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between trust class membership and COVID-19 vaccination while accounting for uncertainty in class assignment.
Results: Our analytic sample (n = 522) was predominantly aged 18-34 (52%) and female (71%). Results suggested a four-class solution: (1) low trust, (2) high trust in all sources, (3) high trust in doctor and government, and (4) high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family. Unadjusted odds of vaccination were greater in the high trust in all sources (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2), high trust in doctor and government (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.3), and high trust in doctor, faith leader, and family classes (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2, 3.9) than the low trust class. However, these associations were not significant after adjustment for sociodemographic and health status factors.
Conclusion: Although COVID-19 vaccination varied across trust classes, our adjusted findings do not suggest a direct association between trust and vaccination, reflecting complexities in the vaccine decision-making process.
期刊介绍：
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
