将气候变化纳入害虫风险评估的建模工具

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
EPPO Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1111/epp.12994
Darren Kriticos, Anna Szyniszewska, Catherine Bradshaw, Christine Li, Eleni Verykouki, Tania Yonow, Catriona Duffy
{"title":"将气候变化纳入害虫风险评估的建模工具","authors":"Darren Kriticos,&nbsp;Anna Szyniszewska,&nbsp;Catherine Bradshaw,&nbsp;Christine Li,&nbsp;Eleni Verykouki,&nbsp;Tania Yonow,&nbsp;Catriona Duffy","doi":"10.1111/epp.12994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modelling tools available for integrating climate change impacts into pest risk assessments (PRA), elucidating the existing methodologies and models employed to understand the potential distributions of pests based on historical data and under future climate change scenarios. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of these models and provide commentary on their ability to identify emerging threats due to climate change accurately and adequately, considering pest establishment likelihood, host crop exposure and the distribution of impacts. The simplest methods are based on climate-matching models, degree-day development models and Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Correlative species distribution models derive species–environment relationships and have been applied to PRA with mixed success. When fitted models are applied to different continents they are usually challenged to extrapolate climate suitability patterns outside the climate space used to train them. Global climate change is creating novel climates, exacerbating this ‘transferability’ problem. Some tools have been developed to reveal when these models are extrapolating. Process-oriented models, which focus on mechanisms and processes rather than distribution patterns, are inherently more reliable for extrapolation to novel climates such as new continents and future climate scenarios. These models, however, require more skill and generally more knowledge of the species to craft robust models.</p>","PeriodicalId":34952,"journal":{"name":"EPPO Bulletin","volume":"54 S1","pages":"38-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epp.12994","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling tools for including climate change in pest risk assessments\",\"authors\":\"Darren Kriticos,&nbsp;Anna Szyniszewska,&nbsp;Catherine Bradshaw,&nbsp;Christine Li,&nbsp;Eleni Verykouki,&nbsp;Tania Yonow,&nbsp;Catriona Duffy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epp.12994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modelling tools available for integrating climate change impacts into pest risk assessments (PRA), elucidating the existing methodologies and models employed to understand the potential distributions of pests based on historical data and under future climate change scenarios. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of these models and provide commentary on their ability to identify emerging threats due to climate change accurately and adequately, considering pest establishment likelihood, host crop exposure and the distribution of impacts. The simplest methods are based on climate-matching models, degree-day development models and Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Correlative species distribution models derive species–environment relationships and have been applied to PRA with mixed success. When fitted models are applied to different continents they are usually challenged to extrapolate climate suitability patterns outside the climate space used to train them. Global climate change is creating novel climates, exacerbating this ‘transferability’ problem. Some tools have been developed to reveal when these models are extrapolating. Process-oriented models, which focus on mechanisms and processes rather than distribution patterns, are inherently more reliable for extrapolation to novel climates such as new continents and future climate scenarios. These models, however, require more skill and generally more knowledge of the species to craft robust models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPPO Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"54 S1\",\"pages\":\"38-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epp.12994\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPPO Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epp.12994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPPO Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epp.12994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文全面概述了可用于将气候变化影响纳入害虫风险评估(PRA)的建模工具,阐明了现有的方法和模型,以了解基于历史数据和未来气候变化情景下害虫的潜在分布情况。我们强调了这些模型的优缺点,并对其准确、充分地识别气候变化带来的新威胁的能力进行了评述,同时考虑了害虫成灾的可能性、寄主作物的风险以及影响的分布。最简单的方法基于气候匹配模型、度日发展模型和柯本-盖革气候分类法。相关物种分布模型可推导出物种与环境的关系,并已应用于灾后恢复和重建,但效果参差不齐。当拟合模型被应用于不同大陆时,它们通常会受到挑战,无法推断出用于训练它们的气候空间之外的气候适宜性模式。全球气候变化正在创造新的气候,加剧了这一 "可转移性 "问题。目前已开发出一些工具来揭示这些模型何时出现外推现象。以过程为导向的模型侧重于机制和过程,而不是分布模式,在推断新气候(如新大陆和未来气候情景)时本质上更为可靠。然而,这些模型需要更多的技能和对物种更多的了解,才能制作出可靠的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Modelling tools for including climate change in pest risk assessments

Modelling tools for including climate change in pest risk assessments

This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modelling tools available for integrating climate change impacts into pest risk assessments (PRA), elucidating the existing methodologies and models employed to understand the potential distributions of pests based on historical data and under future climate change scenarios. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of these models and provide commentary on their ability to identify emerging threats due to climate change accurately and adequately, considering pest establishment likelihood, host crop exposure and the distribution of impacts. The simplest methods are based on climate-matching models, degree-day development models and Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Correlative species distribution models derive species–environment relationships and have been applied to PRA with mixed success. When fitted models are applied to different continents they are usually challenged to extrapolate climate suitability patterns outside the climate space used to train them. Global climate change is creating novel climates, exacerbating this ‘transferability’ problem. Some tools have been developed to reveal when these models are extrapolating. Process-oriented models, which focus on mechanisms and processes rather than distribution patterns, are inherently more reliable for extrapolation to novel climates such as new continents and future climate scenarios. These models, however, require more skill and generally more knowledge of the species to craft robust models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EPPO Bulletin
EPPO Bulletin Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, the EPPO Bulletin publishes research findings on all aspects of plant protection, but particularly those of immediate concern to government plant protection services. Papers are published in English and French, with summaries also in Russian.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信