保守疗法对妊娠期腰背痛的疼痛、残疾和生活质量的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Laísa B Maia , Letícia G Amarante , Débora FM Vitorino , Rodrigo O Mascarenhas , Ana Cristina R Lacerda , Bianca M Lourenço , Vinícius C Oliveira
{"title":"保守疗法对妊娠期腰背痛的疼痛、残疾和生活质量的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾","authors":"Laísa B Maia ,&nbsp;Letícia G Amarante ,&nbsp;Débora FM Vitorino ,&nbsp;Rodrigo O Mascarenhas ,&nbsp;Ana Cristina R Lacerda ,&nbsp;Bianca M Lourenço ,&nbsp;Vinícius C Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The efficacy of conservative therapy for low back pain in pregnancy (PLBP) is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the efficacy of conservative therapy on pain, disability, and quality of life in PLBP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The search strategy was conducted on six databases up to August 24, 2020, without date or language restrictions. Minimal intervention (i.e., placebo, sham, waiting list, or no intervention) was the comparator of interest. Selection of randomized controlled trials, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of included trials were conducted independently by two reviewers. The PEDro scale (0-10) was used to assess methodological quality. Effect sizes for specific therapies were pooled when possible, using random-effects models. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment (GRADE) approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten included trials provide uncertain evidence (low to very low quality) about the effects of auriculotherapy, education, exercise, exercise plus education, oil treatment, and osteopathy in pain, disability, and quality of life at short- and long-term. At short-term, mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) on a 0-10 points pain intensity scale were: for oil treatment, 2.8 points (2.6, 3.1) (n = one trial, 114 participants); for auriculotherapy, 1.6 points (1.2, 2.0) (n = one trial, 112 participants); for exercise, 2.2 points (-1.8, 6.2) (n = three trials, 297 participants).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is an urgent need for larger, high-quality trials investigating the effects of conservative therapy on pain, disability, and quality of life in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Our systematic review shows that the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of conservative therapy (e.g., oil treatment, auriculotherapy, and exercise) on pain, disability, and quality of life in the short- and long term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100654"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSERVATIVE THERAPY ON PAIN, DISABILITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW BACK PAIN IN PREGNANCY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS\",\"authors\":\"Laísa B Maia ,&nbsp;Letícia G Amarante ,&nbsp;Débora FM Vitorino ,&nbsp;Rodrigo O Mascarenhas ,&nbsp;Ana Cristina R Lacerda ,&nbsp;Bianca M Lourenço ,&nbsp;Vinícius C Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The efficacy of conservative therapy for low back pain in pregnancy (PLBP) is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the efficacy of conservative therapy on pain, disability, and quality of life in PLBP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The search strategy was conducted on six databases up to August 24, 2020, without date or language restrictions. Minimal intervention (i.e., placebo, sham, waiting list, or no intervention) was the comparator of interest. Selection of randomized controlled trials, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of included trials were conducted independently by two reviewers. The PEDro scale (0-10) was used to assess methodological quality. Effect sizes for specific therapies were pooled when possible, using random-effects models. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment (GRADE) approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten included trials provide uncertain evidence (low to very low quality) about the effects of auriculotherapy, education, exercise, exercise plus education, oil treatment, and osteopathy in pain, disability, and quality of life at short- and long-term. At short-term, mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) on a 0-10 points pain intensity scale were: for oil treatment, 2.8 points (2.6, 3.1) (n = one trial, 114 participants); for auriculotherapy, 1.6 points (1.2, 2.0) (n = one trial, 112 participants); for exercise, 2.2 points (-1.8, 6.2) (n = three trials, 297 participants).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is an urgent need for larger, high-quality trials investigating the effects of conservative therapy on pain, disability, and quality of life in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Our systematic review shows that the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of conservative therapy (e.g., oil treatment, auriculotherapy, and exercise) on pain, disability, and quality of life in the short- and long term.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524000650\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524000650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景保守疗法对妊娠期腰背痛(PLBP)的疗效尚不明确。目的研究保守疗法对妊娠期腰背痛患者的疼痛、残疾和生活质量的疗效。方法在截至 2020 年 8 月 24 日的六个数据库中进行了检索,没有日期或语言限制。最小干预(即安慰剂、假干预、候补干预或无干预)是关注的比较对象。随机对照试验的筛选、数据提取和纳入试验的方法学质量评估由两名审稿人独立完成。方法学质量评估采用PEDro评分法(0-10分)。在可能的情况下,采用随机效应模型对特定疗法的效应大小进行汇总。结果十项纳入的试验提供了不确定的证据(低质量到极低质量),说明耳穴疗法、教育、运动、运动加教育、精油治疗和骨疗法对疼痛、残疾和生活质量的短期和长期影响。在短期,0-10 分疼痛强度量表的平均差(MDs)和 95% 置信区间(CI)分别为:精油治疗,2.8 分(2.6, 3.1)(n = 1 项试验,114 名参与者);耳穴疗法,1.6 分(1.2, 2.0)(n = 1 项试验,112 名参与者);运动,2.2 分(-1.8, 6.我们的系统综述显示,关于保守疗法(例如:精油治疗、耳穴疗法)效果的证据非常不确定、我们的系统综述显示,关于保守疗法(如精油治疗、耳穴疗法和运动)对疼痛、残疾和生活质量的短期和长期影响,证据还很不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSERVATIVE THERAPY ON PAIN, DISABILITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE FOR LOW BACK PAIN IN PREGNANCY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Background

The efficacy of conservative therapy for low back pain in pregnancy (PLBP) is unclear.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of conservative therapy on pain, disability, and quality of life in PLBP.

Methods

The search strategy was conducted on six databases up to August 24, 2020, without date or language restrictions. Minimal intervention (i.e., placebo, sham, waiting list, or no intervention) was the comparator of interest. Selection of randomized controlled trials, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of included trials were conducted independently by two reviewers. The PEDro scale (0-10) was used to assess methodological quality. Effect sizes for specific therapies were pooled when possible, using random-effects models. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment (GRADE) approach.

Results

Ten included trials provide uncertain evidence (low to very low quality) about the effects of auriculotherapy, education, exercise, exercise plus education, oil treatment, and osteopathy in pain, disability, and quality of life at short- and long-term. At short-term, mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) on a 0-10 points pain intensity scale were: for oil treatment, 2.8 points (2.6, 3.1) (n = one trial, 114 participants); for auriculotherapy, 1.6 points (1.2, 2.0) (n = one trial, 112 participants); for exercise, 2.2 points (-1.8, 6.2) (n = three trials, 297 participants).

Conclusion

There is an urgent need for larger, high-quality trials investigating the effects of conservative therapy on pain, disability, and quality of life in this population.

Implications

Our systematic review shows that the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of conservative therapy (e.g., oil treatment, auriculotherapy, and exercise) on pain, disability, and quality of life in the short- and long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信