{"title":"AHoJ-DB:基于单个蛋白质与配体的相互作用,在整个 PDB 范围内分配 apo 和 holo 关系。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A single protein structure is rarely sufficient to capture the conformational variability of a protein. Both bound and unbound (holo and apo) forms of a protein are essential for understanding its geometry and making meaningful comparisons. Nevertheless, docking or drug design studies often still consider only single protein structures in their holo form, which are for the most part rigid. With the recent explosion in the field of structural biology, large, curated datasets are urgently needed. Here, we use a previously developed application (AHoJ) to perform a comprehensive search for apo-holo pairs for 468,293 biologically relevant protein–ligand interactions across 27,983 proteins. In each search, the binding pocket is captured and mapped across existing structures within the same UniProt, and the mapped pockets are annotated as apo or holo, based on the presence or absence of ligands. We assemble the results into a database, AHoJ-DB (<span><span>www.apoholo.cz/db</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), that captures the variability of proteins with identical sequences, thereby exposing the agents responsible for the observed differences in geometry. We report several metrics for each annotated pocket, and we also include binding pockets that form at the interface of multiple chains. Analysis of the database shows that about 24% of the binding sites occur at the interface of two or more chains and that less than 50% of the total binding sites processed have an apo form in the PDB. These results can be used to train and evaluate predictors, discover potentially druggable proteins, and reveal protein- and ligand-specific relationships that were previously obscured by intermittent or partial data.</p><p>Availability: <span><span>www.apoholo.cz/db</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Biology","volume":"436 17","pages":"Article 168545"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283624001402/pdfft?md5=f8fea6cdc88d1aafc3fe11d1d30c7887&pid=1-s2.0-S0022283624001402-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AHoJ-DB: A PDB-wide Assignment of apo & holo Relationships Based on Individual Protein–Ligand Interactions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A single protein structure is rarely sufficient to capture the conformational variability of a protein. Both bound and unbound (holo and apo) forms of a protein are essential for understanding its geometry and making meaningful comparisons. Nevertheless, docking or drug design studies often still consider only single protein structures in their holo form, which are for the most part rigid. With the recent explosion in the field of structural biology, large, curated datasets are urgently needed. Here, we use a previously developed application (AHoJ) to perform a comprehensive search for apo-holo pairs for 468,293 biologically relevant protein–ligand interactions across 27,983 proteins. In each search, the binding pocket is captured and mapped across existing structures within the same UniProt, and the mapped pockets are annotated as apo or holo, based on the presence or absence of ligands. We assemble the results into a database, AHoJ-DB (<span><span>www.apoholo.cz/db</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>), that captures the variability of proteins with identical sequences, thereby exposing the agents responsible for the observed differences in geometry. We report several metrics for each annotated pocket, and we also include binding pockets that form at the interface of multiple chains. Analysis of the database shows that about 24% of the binding sites occur at the interface of two or more chains and that less than 50% of the total binding sites processed have an apo form in the PDB. These results can be used to train and evaluate predictors, discover potentially druggable proteins, and reveal protein- and ligand-specific relationships that were previously obscured by intermittent or partial data.</p><p>Availability: <span><span>www.apoholo.cz/db</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Biology\",\"volume\":\"436 17\",\"pages\":\"Article 168545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283624001402/pdfft?md5=f8fea6cdc88d1aafc3fe11d1d30c7887&pid=1-s2.0-S0022283624001402-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283624001402\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283624001402","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
AHoJ-DB: A PDB-wide Assignment of apo & holo Relationships Based on Individual Protein–Ligand Interactions
A single protein structure is rarely sufficient to capture the conformational variability of a protein. Both bound and unbound (holo and apo) forms of a protein are essential for understanding its geometry and making meaningful comparisons. Nevertheless, docking or drug design studies often still consider only single protein structures in their holo form, which are for the most part rigid. With the recent explosion in the field of structural biology, large, curated datasets are urgently needed. Here, we use a previously developed application (AHoJ) to perform a comprehensive search for apo-holo pairs for 468,293 biologically relevant protein–ligand interactions across 27,983 proteins. In each search, the binding pocket is captured and mapped across existing structures within the same UniProt, and the mapped pockets are annotated as apo or holo, based on the presence or absence of ligands. We assemble the results into a database, AHoJ-DB (www.apoholo.cz/db), that captures the variability of proteins with identical sequences, thereby exposing the agents responsible for the observed differences in geometry. We report several metrics for each annotated pocket, and we also include binding pockets that form at the interface of multiple chains. Analysis of the database shows that about 24% of the binding sites occur at the interface of two or more chains and that less than 50% of the total binding sites processed have an apo form in the PDB. These results can be used to train and evaluate predictors, discover potentially druggable proteins, and reveal protein- and ligand-specific relationships that were previously obscured by intermittent or partial data.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Molecular Biology (JMB) provides high quality, comprehensive and broad coverage in all areas of molecular biology. The journal publishes original scientific research papers that provide mechanistic and functional insights and report a significant advance to the field. The journal encourages the submission of multidisciplinary studies that use complementary experimental and computational approaches to address challenging biological questions.
Research areas include but are not limited to: Biomolecular interactions, signaling networks, systems biology; Cell cycle, cell growth, cell differentiation; Cell death, autophagy; Cell signaling and regulation; Chemical biology; Computational biology, in combination with experimental studies; DNA replication, repair, and recombination; Development, regenerative biology, mechanistic and functional studies of stem cells; Epigenetics, chromatin structure and function; Gene expression; Membrane processes, cell surface proteins and cell-cell interactions; Methodological advances, both experimental and theoretical, including databases; Microbiology, virology, and interactions with the host or environment; Microbiota mechanistic and functional studies; Nuclear organization; Post-translational modifications, proteomics; Processing and function of biologically important macromolecules and complexes; Molecular basis of disease; RNA processing, structure and functions of non-coding RNAs, transcription; Sorting, spatiotemporal organization, trafficking; Structural biology; Synthetic biology; Translation, protein folding, chaperones, protein degradation and quality control.