通过社交媒体传播临床和科学实践:基于 SIAARTI 共识的文件。

Andrea Cortegiani, Denise Battaglini, Giovanna Amato, Astrid Ursula Behr, Katia Donadello, Sharon Einav, Maria Grazia Frigo, Giorgio Fullin, Alberto Giannini, Mariachiara Ippolito, Franco Marozzi, Roberta Monzani, Gianpaola Monti, Marcus J Schultz, Vito Torrano, Gianluca Villa, Antonino Giarratano
{"title":"通过社交媒体传播临床和科学实践:基于 SIAARTI 共识的文件。","authors":"Andrea Cortegiani, Denise Battaglini, Giovanna Amato, Astrid Ursula Behr, Katia Donadello, Sharon Einav, Maria Grazia Frigo, Giorgio Fullin, Alberto Giannini, Mariachiara Ippolito, Franco Marozzi, Roberta Monzani, Gianpaola Monti, Marcus J Schultz, Vito Torrano, Gianluca Villa, Antonino Giarratano","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00157-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dissemination of medical practice and scientific information through social media (SoMe) by clinicians and researchers is increasing. Broad exposure of information can promote connectivity within the scientific community, overcome barriers to access to sources, increase debate, and reveal layperson perspectives and preferences. On the other hand, practices lacking scientific evidence may also be promoted, laypeople may misunderstand the professional message, and clinician may suffer erosion of professional status. The aim of this project was to enhance awareness and advise the anesthesia community and clinicians at large about the potential risks advocate for responsible use of SoMe to disseminate information related to medical practices and knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi process with prespecified consensus criteria was conducted among a multidisciplinary panel of experts, including anesthesiologists-intensivists, clinical psychologists, and forensic medicine specialists. Six items were identified: Ethics and deontological principles, the practice of sharing information via social media, legal aspects, psychological aspects, self-promotion, and criteria for appropriate dissemination. Statements and rationales were produced and subjected to blinded panelists' votes. After reaching consensus, a document was written which then underwent external review by experts uninvolved in the consensus process. The project was promoted by the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve statements were produced, and consensus was achieved for all. The panel concluded that the general principles guiding dissemination of professional information via SoMe must remain in line with the general principles of ethics, deontology, and scientific validity that guide the medical profession and science in general. Professional equity must be maintained while communicating via SoMe. Medical practices lacking support by scientific evidence should not be disseminated. Patients' informed consent must be obtained before dissemination of information, images, or data. Self-promotion must not be prioritized over any of these principles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When sharing medical practices and scientific information on SoMe, healthcare professionals are advised to act conscientiously and ethically. Local regulations should be adhered to. Institutional training on the potential risks and proper of SoMe for such purpose may contribute to preservation of professional integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissemination of clinical and scientific practice through social media: a SIAARTI consensus-based document.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Cortegiani, Denise Battaglini, Giovanna Amato, Astrid Ursula Behr, Katia Donadello, Sharon Einav, Maria Grazia Frigo, Giorgio Fullin, Alberto Giannini, Mariachiara Ippolito, Franco Marozzi, Roberta Monzani, Gianpaola Monti, Marcus J Schultz, Vito Torrano, Gianluca Villa, Antonino Giarratano\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44158-024-00157-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dissemination of medical practice and scientific information through social media (SoMe) by clinicians and researchers is increasing. Broad exposure of information can promote connectivity within the scientific community, overcome barriers to access to sources, increase debate, and reveal layperson perspectives and preferences. On the other hand, practices lacking scientific evidence may also be promoted, laypeople may misunderstand the professional message, and clinician may suffer erosion of professional status. The aim of this project was to enhance awareness and advise the anesthesia community and clinicians at large about the potential risks advocate for responsible use of SoMe to disseminate information related to medical practices and knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi process with prespecified consensus criteria was conducted among a multidisciplinary panel of experts, including anesthesiologists-intensivists, clinical psychologists, and forensic medicine specialists. Six items were identified: Ethics and deontological principles, the practice of sharing information via social media, legal aspects, psychological aspects, self-promotion, and criteria for appropriate dissemination. Statements and rationales were produced and subjected to blinded panelists' votes. After reaching consensus, a document was written which then underwent external review by experts uninvolved in the consensus process. The project was promoted by the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve statements were produced, and consensus was achieved for all. The panel concluded that the general principles guiding dissemination of professional information via SoMe must remain in line with the general principles of ethics, deontology, and scientific validity that guide the medical profession and science in general. Professional equity must be maintained while communicating via SoMe. Medical practices lacking support by scientific evidence should not be disseminated. Patients' informed consent must be obtained before dissemination of information, images, or data. Self-promotion must not be prioritized over any of these principles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When sharing medical practices and scientific information on SoMe, healthcare professionals are advised to act conscientiously and ethically. Local regulations should be adhered to. Institutional training on the potential risks and proper of SoMe for such purpose may contribute to preservation of professional integrity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00157-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00157-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床医生和研究人员通过社交媒体(SoMe)传播医疗实践和科学信息的情况日益增多。信息的广泛传播可以促进科学界的联系,克服获取信息来源的障碍,增加辩论,并揭示非专业人士的观点和偏好。另一方面,缺乏科学依据的做法也可能得到推广,非专业人士可能会误解专业信息,临床医生的专业地位也可能受到削弱。本项目旨在提高麻醉界和广大临床医生对SoMe潜在风险的认识和建议,倡导负责任地使用SoMe传播与医疗实践和知识相关的信息:在一个多学科专家小组(包括麻醉师、麻醉师、临床心理学家和法医专家)中开展了一个经过修改的德尔菲过程,该过程采用了预先规定的共识标准。确定了六个项目:道德和伦理原则、通过社交媒体分享信息的做法、法律方面、心理方面、自我宣传以及适当传播的标准。编写了声明和理由,并由盲人小组成员进行投票。在达成共识后,编写了一份文件,然后由未参与共识过程的专家进行外部审查。该项目由意大利麻醉镇痛复苏和重症监护学会(SIAARTI)推动:结果:共产生了 12 份声明,并就所有声明达成了共识。小组得出的结论是,通过 SoMe 传播专业信息的一般指导原则必须与指导医学界和整个科学界的道德、道义和科学有效性等一般原则保持一致。在通过 SoMe 进行交流时,必须保持职业公平。不得传播缺乏科学证据支持的医疗实践。在传播信息、图像或数据之前,必须征得患者的知情同意。自我宣传不得优先于上述任何原则:建议医疗保健专业人员在 SoMe 上分享医疗实践和科学信息时,应自觉遵守道德规范。应遵守当地法规。就SoMe的潜在风险和使用SoMe的适当性进行机构培训,可有助于维护职业操守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissemination of clinical and scientific practice through social media: a SIAARTI consensus-based document.

Background: Dissemination of medical practice and scientific information through social media (SoMe) by clinicians and researchers is increasing. Broad exposure of information can promote connectivity within the scientific community, overcome barriers to access to sources, increase debate, and reveal layperson perspectives and preferences. On the other hand, practices lacking scientific evidence may also be promoted, laypeople may misunderstand the professional message, and clinician may suffer erosion of professional status. The aim of this project was to enhance awareness and advise the anesthesia community and clinicians at large about the potential risks advocate for responsible use of SoMe to disseminate information related to medical practices and knowledge.

Methods: A modified Delphi process with prespecified consensus criteria was conducted among a multidisciplinary panel of experts, including anesthesiologists-intensivists, clinical psychologists, and forensic medicine specialists. Six items were identified: Ethics and deontological principles, the practice of sharing information via social media, legal aspects, psychological aspects, self-promotion, and criteria for appropriate dissemination. Statements and rationales were produced and subjected to blinded panelists' votes. After reaching consensus, a document was written which then underwent external review by experts uninvolved in the consensus process. The project was promoted by the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).

Results: Twelve statements were produced, and consensus was achieved for all. The panel concluded that the general principles guiding dissemination of professional information via SoMe must remain in line with the general principles of ethics, deontology, and scientific validity that guide the medical profession and science in general. Professional equity must be maintained while communicating via SoMe. Medical practices lacking support by scientific evidence should not be disseminated. Patients' informed consent must be obtained before dissemination of information, images, or data. Self-promotion must not be prioritized over any of these principles.

Conclusions: When sharing medical practices and scientific information on SoMe, healthcare professionals are advised to act conscientiously and ethically. Local regulations should be adhered to. Institutional training on the potential risks and proper of SoMe for such purpose may contribute to preservation of professional integrity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信