Ayman Hammoudeh, Yahya Badaineh, Ramzi Tabbalat, Anas Ahmad, Mohammad Bahhour, Darya Ja'ara, Joud Shehadeh, Mohammad A Jum'ah, Afnan Migdad, Mohammad Hani, Imad A Alhaddad
{"title":"中东患者心房颤动与冠状动脉疾病的交集。约旦心房颤动研究分析。","authors":"Ayman Hammoudeh, Yahya Badaineh, Ramzi Tabbalat, Anas Ahmad, Mohammad Bahhour, Darya Ja'ara, Joud Shehadeh, Mohammad A Jum'ah, Afnan Migdad, Mohammad Hani, Imad A Alhaddad","doi":"10.5334/gh.1312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a scarcity of clinical studies which evaluate the association of atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) in the Middle East. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CAD on baseline clinical profiles and one-year outcomes in a Middle Eastern cohort with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive AF patients evaluated in 29 hospitals and cardiology clinics were enrolled in the Jordan AF Study (May 2019-December 2020). Clinical and echocardiographic features, use of medications and one-year outcomes in patients with AF/CAD were compared to AF/no CAD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2020 AF patients enrolled, 216 (10.7%) had CAD. Patients with AF/CAD were more likely to be men and had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, heart failure and chronic kidney disease compared to the AF/no CAD patients. They also had lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction and larger left atrial size. Mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub> VASc and HAS-BLED scores were higher in AF/CAD patients than those with AF/no CAD (4.3 ± 1.7 vs. 3.6 ± 1.8, p < 0.0001) and (2.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 1.1, p < 0.0001), respectively. Oral anticoagulant agents were used in similar rates in the two groups (83.8% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.81), but more patients with AF/CAD were prescribed additional antiplatelet agents compared to patients with AF/no CAD (73.7% vs. 41.5%, p < 0.0001). At one year, AF/CAD patients, compared to AF/no CAD patients had significantly higher hospitalization rate (39.4% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.003), more acute coronary syndrome and coronary revascularization (6.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.004), and higher all-cause mortality (18.5% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of Middle Eastern patients with AF, one in 10 patients had CAD. The coexistence of AF and CAD was associated with a worse baseline clinical profile and one-year outcomes. Clinical study registration: the study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier number NCT03917992).</p>","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"19 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intersection of Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease in Middle Eastern Patients. Analysis from the Jordan Atrial Fibrillation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ayman Hammoudeh, Yahya Badaineh, Ramzi Tabbalat, Anas Ahmad, Mohammad Bahhour, Darya Ja'ara, Joud Shehadeh, Mohammad A Jum'ah, Afnan Migdad, Mohammad Hani, Imad A Alhaddad\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/gh.1312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a scarcity of clinical studies which evaluate the association of atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) in the Middle East. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CAD on baseline clinical profiles and one-year outcomes in a Middle Eastern cohort with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive AF patients evaluated in 29 hospitals and cardiology clinics were enrolled in the Jordan AF Study (May 2019-December 2020). Clinical and echocardiographic features, use of medications and one-year outcomes in patients with AF/CAD were compared to AF/no CAD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2020 AF patients enrolled, 216 (10.7%) had CAD. Patients with AF/CAD were more likely to be men and had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, heart failure and chronic kidney disease compared to the AF/no CAD patients. They also had lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction and larger left atrial size. Mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub> VASc and HAS-BLED scores were higher in AF/CAD patients than those with AF/no CAD (4.3 ± 1.7 vs. 3.6 ± 1.8, p < 0.0001) and (2.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 1.1, p < 0.0001), respectively. Oral anticoagulant agents were used in similar rates in the two groups (83.8% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.81), but more patients with AF/CAD were prescribed additional antiplatelet agents compared to patients with AF/no CAD (73.7% vs. 41.5%, p < 0.0001). At one year, AF/CAD patients, compared to AF/no CAD patients had significantly higher hospitalization rate (39.4% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.003), more acute coronary syndrome and coronary revascularization (6.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.004), and higher all-cause mortality (18.5% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of Middle Eastern patients with AF, one in 10 patients had CAD. The coexistence of AF and CAD was associated with a worse baseline clinical profile and one-year outcomes. Clinical study registration: the study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier number NCT03917992).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Heart\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1312\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Intersection of Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease in Middle Eastern Patients. Analysis from the Jordan Atrial Fibrillation Study.
Background: There is a scarcity of clinical studies which evaluate the association of atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) in the Middle East. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CAD on baseline clinical profiles and one-year outcomes in a Middle Eastern cohort with AF.
Methods: Consecutive AF patients evaluated in 29 hospitals and cardiology clinics were enrolled in the Jordan AF Study (May 2019-December 2020). Clinical and echocardiographic features, use of medications and one-year outcomes in patients with AF/CAD were compared to AF/no CAD patients.
Results: Of 2020 AF patients enrolled, 216 (10.7%) had CAD. Patients with AF/CAD were more likely to be men and had significantly higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, heart failure and chronic kidney disease compared to the AF/no CAD patients. They also had lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction and larger left atrial size. Mean CHA2DS2 VASc and HAS-BLED scores were higher in AF/CAD patients than those with AF/no CAD (4.3 ± 1.7 vs. 3.6 ± 1.8, p < 0.0001) and (2.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 1.1, p < 0.0001), respectively. Oral anticoagulant agents were used in similar rates in the two groups (83.8% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.81), but more patients with AF/CAD were prescribed additional antiplatelet agents compared to patients with AF/no CAD (73.7% vs. 41.5%, p < 0.0001). At one year, AF/CAD patients, compared to AF/no CAD patients had significantly higher hospitalization rate (39.4% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.003), more acute coronary syndrome and coronary revascularization (6.9% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.004), and higher all-cause mortality (18.5% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.002).
Conclusions: In this cohort of Middle Eastern patients with AF, one in 10 patients had CAD. The coexistence of AF and CAD was associated with a worse baseline clinical profile and one-year outcomes. Clinical study registration: the study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier number NCT03917992).
Global HeartMedicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍：
Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources.
Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention.
Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
