研究血液透析患者和对照组接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的 IgG 滴度。

Q3 Medicine
Manizheh Jozpanahi, Roghayeh Jafari, Mohammad Moharrer, Pouria Mahmoudi, Seyedeh Pegah Saeed, Hosein Dinmohammadi
{"title":"研究血液透析患者和对照组接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的 IgG 滴度。","authors":"Manizheh Jozpanahi, Roghayeh Jafari, Mohammad Moharrer, Pouria Mahmoudi, Seyedeh Pegah Saeed, Hosein Dinmohammadi","doi":"10.5935/0946-5448.20230028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients necessitate dialysis when kidney transplantation is not feasible. Hemodialysis patients exhibit higher mortality rates compared to the general population due to uremia and an increased burden of comorbidities. In this vulnerable population, defective innate and adaptive immunity contribute to infectious diseases being a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality. Given the COVID-19 pandemic and the potential for a diminished antibody response to the COVID-19 vaccine among dialysis patients, this study aimed to measure IgG antibody titers in this patient group following COVID-19 vaccination and compare them to healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled hemodialysis patients who had received a minimum of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine within the past two to six months. Informed consent was obtained from the patients for antibody titer testing. Additional information was collected using a checklist. A control group consisting of individuals who had also received at least two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine was selected and matched to the patient group based on vaccine type, number of doses, and timing of administration. Relevant data for both groups were recorded in the checklist. IgG titers were measured using the indirect ELISA technique to quantify specific IgG against the Spike antigen in the serum samples of both patients and controls. A comparison of IgG titers between the two groups was conducted using SPSS version 26 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hemodialysis group comprised 44.1% males, while the control group consisted of 67.6% males. The mean age for the hemodialysis and control groups was 59.97±15.92 and 54.79±21.77, respectively. Underlying diseases were present in 76.5% of the hemodialysis group and 58.8% of the control group, with hypertension being the most common comorbidity in both groups. Sinopharm was the most commonly administered vaccine in both groups for both the first and second doses. Vaccine side effects were reported by 50% of hemodialysis patients and 17.6% of the control group. Furthermore, 55.9% of the hemodialysis group and 35.3% of the control group had a history of prior COVID-19 infection before vaccination. The positive IgG titer rates were 94% in the hemodialysis group and 91% in the control group, with no significant difference observed between the two groups (P<0.999). The relationship between positive IgG titers and group membership was not significant across other investigated variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study revealed no significant difference in IgG titers against the S1 antigen between hemodialysis patients and controls who had received a minimum of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Furthermore, IgG titers were not associated with age, sex, underlying diseases, vaccine side effects, or behavioral parameters. In addition, an inverse correlation was observed between the duration since the last vaccine dose and the initiation of dialysis, and IgG titers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39842,"journal":{"name":"International Tinnitus Journal","volume":"27 2","pages":"183-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of IgG Titers in Hemodialysis Patients and Controls Following Administration of the COVID-19 Vaccine.\",\"authors\":\"Manizheh Jozpanahi, Roghayeh Jafari, Mohammad Moharrer, Pouria Mahmoudi, Seyedeh Pegah Saeed, Hosein Dinmohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/0946-5448.20230028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients necessitate dialysis when kidney transplantation is not feasible. Hemodialysis patients exhibit higher mortality rates compared to the general population due to uremia and an increased burden of comorbidities. In this vulnerable population, defective innate and adaptive immunity contribute to infectious diseases being a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality. Given the COVID-19 pandemic and the potential for a diminished antibody response to the COVID-19 vaccine among dialysis patients, this study aimed to measure IgG antibody titers in this patient group following COVID-19 vaccination and compare them to healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled hemodialysis patients who had received a minimum of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine within the past two to six months. Informed consent was obtained from the patients for antibody titer testing. Additional information was collected using a checklist. A control group consisting of individuals who had also received at least two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine was selected and matched to the patient group based on vaccine type, number of doses, and timing of administration. Relevant data for both groups were recorded in the checklist. IgG titers were measured using the indirect ELISA technique to quantify specific IgG against the Spike antigen in the serum samples of both patients and controls. A comparison of IgG titers between the two groups was conducted using SPSS version 26 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hemodialysis group comprised 44.1% males, while the control group consisted of 67.6% males. The mean age for the hemodialysis and control groups was 59.97±15.92 and 54.79±21.77, respectively. Underlying diseases were present in 76.5% of the hemodialysis group and 58.8% of the control group, with hypertension being the most common comorbidity in both groups. Sinopharm was the most commonly administered vaccine in both groups for both the first and second doses. Vaccine side effects were reported by 50% of hemodialysis patients and 17.6% of the control group. Furthermore, 55.9% of the hemodialysis group and 35.3% of the control group had a history of prior COVID-19 infection before vaccination. The positive IgG titer rates were 94% in the hemodialysis group and 91% in the control group, with no significant difference observed between the two groups (P<0.999). The relationship between positive IgG titers and group membership was not significant across other investigated variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study revealed no significant difference in IgG titers against the S1 antigen between hemodialysis patients and controls who had received a minimum of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Furthermore, IgG titers were not associated with age, sex, underlying diseases, vaccine side effects, or behavioral parameters. In addition, an inverse correlation was observed between the duration since the last vaccine dose and the initiation of dialysis, and IgG titers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Tinnitus Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"183-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Tinnitus Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/0946-5448.20230028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Tinnitus Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0946-5448.20230028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介终末期肾病(ESRD)患者在无法进行肾移植的情况下必须进行血液透析。与普通人群相比,血液透析患者因尿毒症和更多的合并症而表现出更高的死亡率。在这一脆弱人群中,先天性免疫缺陷和适应性免疫缺陷导致传染病成为住院和死亡的主要原因。鉴于 COVID-19 大流行以及透析患者对 COVID-19 疫苗的抗体反应可能减弱,本研究旨在测量该患者群体接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的 IgG 抗体滴度,并将其与健康人进行比较:这项横断面研究招募了在过去两到六个月内至少接种过两剂 COVID-19 疫苗的血液透析患者。患者在知情同意的情况下接受了抗体滴度检测。此外,还使用核对表收集了其他信息。对照组由至少接种过两剂 COVID-19 疫苗的患者组成,根据疫苗类型、剂量和接种时间与患者组进行配对。两组的相关数据均记录在核对表中。使用间接 ELISA 技术测量患者和对照组血清样本中针对 Spike 抗原的特异性 IgG 滴度。使用 SPSS 26 版软件对两组间的 IgG 滴度进行比较:血液透析组中男性占 44.1%,而对照组中男性占 67.6%。血液透析组和对照组的平均年龄分别为(59.97±15.92)岁和(54.79±21.77)岁。血液透析组和对照组分别有76.5%和58.8%的人患有基础疾病,其中高血压是两组中最常见的合并症。国药控股是两组中最常接种的疫苗,第一剂和第二剂都是如此。50%的血液透析患者和17.6%的对照组患者报告了疫苗副作用。此外,55.9% 的血液透析组患者和 35.3% 的对照组患者在接种疫苗前曾感染过 COVID-19。血液透析组和对照组的 IgG 滴度阳性率分别为 94% 和 91%,两组间无显著差异(结论:本研究显示,血液透析组和对照组的 IgG 滴度阳性率无显著差异:本研究显示,血液透析患者与至少接种过两剂 COVID-19 疫苗的对照组之间针对 S1 抗原的 IgG 滴度无明显差异。此外,IgG滴度与年龄、性别、基础疾病、疫苗副作用或行为参数无关。此外,从最后一次接种疫苗到开始透析的时间与 IgG 滴度之间呈反相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of IgG Titers in Hemodialysis Patients and Controls Following Administration of the COVID-19 Vaccine.

Introduction: End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients necessitate dialysis when kidney transplantation is not feasible. Hemodialysis patients exhibit higher mortality rates compared to the general population due to uremia and an increased burden of comorbidities. In this vulnerable population, defective innate and adaptive immunity contribute to infectious diseases being a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality. Given the COVID-19 pandemic and the potential for a diminished antibody response to the COVID-19 vaccine among dialysis patients, this study aimed to measure IgG antibody titers in this patient group following COVID-19 vaccination and compare them to healthy individuals.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled hemodialysis patients who had received a minimum of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine within the past two to six months. Informed consent was obtained from the patients for antibody titer testing. Additional information was collected using a checklist. A control group consisting of individuals who had also received at least two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine was selected and matched to the patient group based on vaccine type, number of doses, and timing of administration. Relevant data for both groups were recorded in the checklist. IgG titers were measured using the indirect ELISA technique to quantify specific IgG against the Spike antigen in the serum samples of both patients and controls. A comparison of IgG titers between the two groups was conducted using SPSS version 26 software.

Results: The hemodialysis group comprised 44.1% males, while the control group consisted of 67.6% males. The mean age for the hemodialysis and control groups was 59.97±15.92 and 54.79±21.77, respectively. Underlying diseases were present in 76.5% of the hemodialysis group and 58.8% of the control group, with hypertension being the most common comorbidity in both groups. Sinopharm was the most commonly administered vaccine in both groups for both the first and second doses. Vaccine side effects were reported by 50% of hemodialysis patients and 17.6% of the control group. Furthermore, 55.9% of the hemodialysis group and 35.3% of the control group had a history of prior COVID-19 infection before vaccination. The positive IgG titer rates were 94% in the hemodialysis group and 91% in the control group, with no significant difference observed between the two groups (P<0.999). The relationship between positive IgG titers and group membership was not significant across other investigated variables.

Conclusion: The present study revealed no significant difference in IgG titers against the S1 antigen between hemodialysis patients and controls who had received a minimum of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Furthermore, IgG titers were not associated with age, sex, underlying diseases, vaccine side effects, or behavioral parameters. In addition, an inverse correlation was observed between the duration since the last vaccine dose and the initiation of dialysis, and IgG titers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Tinnitus Journal
International Tinnitus Journal Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The International Tinnitus Journal is the first peer review journal to provide a forum for exchange of information of on-going basic and clinical science efforts for understanding tinnitus and its application to patient diagnosis and treatment. Subject areas to be covered range from fundamental theory to clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信