从三维高清和超高清内视镜系统学到的腹腔镜技能能否迁移到二维高清内视镜系统:一项体外随机研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01805-7
Hemanga K Bhattacharjee, Sarvesh Yadav, Ashwani K Mishra, Suhani Suhani, Mohit Joshi, Rajinder Parshad
{"title":"从三维高清和超高清内视镜系统学到的腹腔镜技能能否迁移到二维高清内视镜系统:一项体外随机研究。","authors":"Hemanga K Bhattacharjee, Sarvesh Yadav, Ashwani K Mishra, Suhani Suhani, Mohit Joshi, Rajinder Parshad","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-01805-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three-dimensional high-definition (3D HD) and ultra-high-definition (4 K HD) endovision systems are rapidly adopted in academic setting. However, transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from these systems to two-dimensional high-definition (2D HD) endovision system is not known. Forty stereo-enabled surgical residents were randomized into two groups. They performed three standardized surgical tasks, Task 1(Peg transfer), Task 2(Precision touch on uneven surface) and Task 3(Surgical knotting on rubber tube) for 15 repetitions using either 3D HD or 4 K HD. Both groups then performed the same tasks using 2D HD for 5 repetitions. Their performances were evaluated for execution time (speed) and error scores (safety). The residents in 3D HD group performed all three tasks significantly faster than residents in 4 K HD group with comparable error scores. The time taken to complete the tasks on 2D HD were comparable between residents trained in 3D HD and 4 K HD in two out of three tasks (p = 0.027, P = 0.115, p = 0.368 in task 1, 2 and 3 respectively). However, in two out of three tasks, residents trained on 3D HD committed significantly more errors than residents trained on 4 K HD (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001 in task 1 and task 2 respectively). Skill acquired on 4 K HD seems transferable to 2D HD environment. Participants trained in 3D HD made more errors while performing the tasks in 2D HD. It may be prudent to offer additional training on 2D HD to residents trained on 3D HD for safer laparoscopic surgical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2461-2470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from three-dimensional high-definition and ultra-high definition endovision system to two-dimensional high-definition endovision system: an ex-vivo randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Hemanga K Bhattacharjee, Sarvesh Yadav, Ashwani K Mishra, Suhani Suhani, Mohit Joshi, Rajinder Parshad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-024-01805-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three-dimensional high-definition (3D HD) and ultra-high-definition (4 K HD) endovision systems are rapidly adopted in academic setting. However, transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from these systems to two-dimensional high-definition (2D HD) endovision system is not known. Forty stereo-enabled surgical residents were randomized into two groups. They performed three standardized surgical tasks, Task 1(Peg transfer), Task 2(Precision touch on uneven surface) and Task 3(Surgical knotting on rubber tube) for 15 repetitions using either 3D HD or 4 K HD. Both groups then performed the same tasks using 2D HD for 5 repetitions. Their performances were evaluated for execution time (speed) and error scores (safety). The residents in 3D HD group performed all three tasks significantly faster than residents in 4 K HD group with comparable error scores. The time taken to complete the tasks on 2D HD were comparable between residents trained in 3D HD and 4 K HD in two out of three tasks (p = 0.027, P = 0.115, p = 0.368 in task 1, 2 and 3 respectively). However, in two out of three tasks, residents trained on 3D HD committed significantly more errors than residents trained on 4 K HD (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001 in task 1 and task 2 respectively). Skill acquired on 4 K HD seems transferable to 2D HD environment. Participants trained in 3D HD made more errors while performing the tasks in 2D HD. It may be prudent to offer additional training on 2D HD to residents trained on 3D HD for safer laparoscopic surgical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2461-2470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01805-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01805-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三维高清(3D HD)和超高清(4 K HD)内视镜系统在学术界迅速普及。然而,从这些系统中获得的腹腔镜技能能否转移到二维高清(2D HD)内视镜系统中还不得而知。40 名具有立体功能的外科住院医师被随机分为两组。他们使用 3D HD 或 4 K HD 完成了三项标准化手术任务:任务 1(Peg 转移)、任务 2(在不平整的表面上精确触摸)和任务 3(在橡胶管上打结),重复 15 次。然后,两组人都使用二维高清重复 5 次同样的任务。根据执行时间(速度)和错误分数(安全性)对他们的表现进行评估。三维高清组的住院医师完成三项任务的速度明显快于 4 K 高清组的住院医师,而错误分数却相当。在三项任务中有两项任务中,接受过 3D HD 和 4 K HD 培训的住院医师完成 2D HD 任务所需的时间相当(任务 1、2 和 3 分别为 P = 0.027、P = 0.115、P = 0.368)。然而,在三项任务中的两项任务中,接受过 3D HD 培训的住院医师的错误率明显高于接受过 4 K HD 培训的住院医师(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from three-dimensional high-definition and ultra-high definition endovision system to two-dimensional high-definition endovision system: an ex-vivo randomized study.

Three-dimensional high-definition (3D HD) and ultra-high-definition (4 K HD) endovision systems are rapidly adopted in academic setting. However, transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from these systems to two-dimensional high-definition (2D HD) endovision system is not known. Forty stereo-enabled surgical residents were randomized into two groups. They performed three standardized surgical tasks, Task 1(Peg transfer), Task 2(Precision touch on uneven surface) and Task 3(Surgical knotting on rubber tube) for 15 repetitions using either 3D HD or 4 K HD. Both groups then performed the same tasks using 2D HD for 5 repetitions. Their performances were evaluated for execution time (speed) and error scores (safety). The residents in 3D HD group performed all three tasks significantly faster than residents in 4 K HD group with comparable error scores. The time taken to complete the tasks on 2D HD were comparable between residents trained in 3D HD and 4 K HD in two out of three tasks (p = 0.027, P = 0.115, p = 0.368 in task 1, 2 and 3 respectively). However, in two out of three tasks, residents trained on 3D HD committed significantly more errors than residents trained on 4 K HD (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001 in task 1 and task 2 respectively). Skill acquired on 4 K HD seems transferable to 2D HD environment. Participants trained in 3D HD made more errors while performing the tasks in 2D HD. It may be prudent to offer additional training on 2D HD to residents trained on 3D HD for safer laparoscopic surgical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信