中风后的幸福(WAterS):共同开发的 "接纳与承诺疗法 "干预措施的可行性测试,以支持中风后的心理调整。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1177/02692155241239879
Emma Patchwood, Hannah Foote, Andy Vail, Sarah Cotterill, Geoff Hill, Audrey Bowen
{"title":"中风后的幸福(WAterS):共同开发的 \"接纳与承诺疗法 \"干预措施的可行性测试,以支持中风后的心理调整。","authors":"Emma Patchwood, Hannah Foote, Andy Vail, Sarah Cotterill, Geoff Hill, Audrey Bowen","doi":"10.1177/02692155241239879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Feasibility test a co-developed intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to support psychological adjustment post-stroke, delivered by a workforce with community in-reach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational feasibility study utilising patient, carer, public involvement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online. UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Stroke survivors with self-reported psychological distress 4  +  months post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The co-developed Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS) intervention includes: 9-weekly, structured, online, group sessions for stroke survivors, delivered via a training programme to upskill staff without Acceptance and Commitment Therapy experience, under Clinical Psychology supervision.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Feasibility of recruitment and retention; data quality from candidate measures; safety. Clinical and demographic information at baseline; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via online surveys (baseline, pre- and post-intervention, 3 and 6 months after intervention end) including Mood (hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)), Wellbeing (ONS4), Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ5D5L), Psychological Flexibility (AAQ-ABI) and Values-Based Living (VQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We trained eight staff and recruited 17 stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate cognitive and communication difficulties. 12/17 (71%) joined three intervention groups with 98% attendance and no related adverse events. PROMS data were well-completed. The HADS is a possible future primary outcome (self-reported depression lower on average by 1.3 points: 8.5 pre-group to 7.1 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI 0.4 to 3.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WAterS intervention warrants further research evaluation. Staff can be trained and upskilled to deliver. It appears safe and feasible to deliver online to groups, and study recruitment and data collection are feasible. Funding has been secured to further develop the intervention, considering implementation and health equality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"979-989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS): Feasibility Testing of a Co-developed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Support Psychological Adjustment After Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Patchwood, Hannah Foote, Andy Vail, Sarah Cotterill, Geoff Hill, Audrey Bowen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241239879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Feasibility test a co-developed intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to support psychological adjustment post-stroke, delivered by a workforce with community in-reach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational feasibility study utilising patient, carer, public involvement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online. UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Stroke survivors with self-reported psychological distress 4  +  months post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The co-developed Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS) intervention includes: 9-weekly, structured, online, group sessions for stroke survivors, delivered via a training programme to upskill staff without Acceptance and Commitment Therapy experience, under Clinical Psychology supervision.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Feasibility of recruitment and retention; data quality from candidate measures; safety. Clinical and demographic information at baseline; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via online surveys (baseline, pre- and post-intervention, 3 and 6 months after intervention end) including Mood (hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)), Wellbeing (ONS4), Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ5D5L), Psychological Flexibility (AAQ-ABI) and Values-Based Living (VQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We trained eight staff and recruited 17 stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate cognitive and communication difficulties. 12/17 (71%) joined three intervention groups with 98% attendance and no related adverse events. PROMS data were well-completed. The HADS is a possible future primary outcome (self-reported depression lower on average by 1.3 points: 8.5 pre-group to 7.1 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI 0.4 to 3.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WAterS intervention warrants further research evaluation. Staff can be trained and upskilled to deliver. It appears safe and feasible to deliver online to groups, and study recruitment and data collection are feasible. Funding has been secured to further develop the intervention, considering implementation and health equality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"979-989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118776/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241239879\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241239879","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标: 对共同开发的基于接纳与承诺疗法的干预措施进行可行性测试:对一项共同开发的干预措施进行可行性测试,该干预措施基于接纳与承诺疗法,旨在支持中风后的心理调整,由一支深入社区的工作人员队伍负责实施:设计:观察性可行性研究,患者、照护者和公众参与:环境:在线地点:英国:干预措施:共同开发的 "中风后的幸福 "项目:共同开发的 "中风后的幸福"(WAterS)干预包括干预措施:共同开发的 "中风后的幸福"(WAterS)干预措施包括:在临床心理学的监督下,通过培训计划为没有接受与承诺疗法经验的工作人员提供技能培训,为中风幸存者提供为期 9 周的结构化在线小组课程:主要措施:招募和保留的可行性;候选措施的数据质量;安全性。基线时的临床和人口统计学信息;通过在线调查(基线、干预前和干预后、干预结束后3个月和6个月)进行的患者报告结果测量(PROMs),包括情绪(医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS))、幸福感(ONS4)、与健康相关的生活质量(EQ5D5L)、心理灵活性(AAQ-ABI)和基于价值观的生活(VQ):我们培训了 8 名工作人员,并招募了 17 名有轻度至中度认知和交流障碍的中风幸存者。12/17(71%)人参加了三个干预小组,出勤率为 98%,无相关不良事件发生。PROMS数据填写良好。HADS 是未来可能的主要结果(自我报告的抑郁程度平均降低了 1.3 分:结论:结论:WAterS 干预措施值得进一步研究评估。可以对员工进行培训,提高他们的技能。对团体进行在线干预似乎既安全又可行,而且研究招募和数据收集也是可行的。考虑到实施和健康平等问题,已经获得了进一步开发该干预措施的资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS): Feasibility Testing of a Co-developed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Support Psychological Adjustment After Stroke.

Objective: Feasibility test a co-developed intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to support psychological adjustment post-stroke, delivered by a workforce with community in-reach.

Design: Observational feasibility study utilising patient, carer, public involvement.

Setting: Online. UK.

Participants: Stroke survivors with self-reported psychological distress 4  +  months post-stroke.

Interventions: The co-developed Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS) intervention includes: 9-weekly, structured, online, group sessions for stroke survivors, delivered via a training programme to upskill staff without Acceptance and Commitment Therapy experience, under Clinical Psychology supervision.

Main measures: Feasibility of recruitment and retention; data quality from candidate measures; safety. Clinical and demographic information at baseline; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via online surveys (baseline, pre- and post-intervention, 3 and 6 months after intervention end) including Mood (hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)), Wellbeing (ONS4), Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ5D5L), Psychological Flexibility (AAQ-ABI) and Values-Based Living (VQ).

Results: We trained eight staff and recruited 17 stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate cognitive and communication difficulties. 12/17 (71%) joined three intervention groups with 98% attendance and no related adverse events. PROMS data were well-completed. The HADS is a possible future primary outcome (self-reported depression lower on average by 1.3 points: 8.5 pre-group to 7.1 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI 0.4 to 3.2).

Conclusion: The WAterS intervention warrants further research evaluation. Staff can be trained and upskilled to deliver. It appears safe and feasible to deliver online to groups, and study recruitment and data collection are feasible. Funding has been secured to further develop the intervention, considering implementation and health equality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信