Florian Egger, Anja Ditscheid, Markus Schwarz, Tim Meyer
{"title":"心血管风险因素和疾病患者步行足球的体能要求。","authors":"Florian Egger, Anja Ditscheid, Markus Schwarz, Tim Meyer","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the exercise intensity of walking football (WF) with walking (WA) and to describe specific movement characteristics of WF.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sports facilities Saarland University, Germany.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Eighteen patients with cardiovascular risk factors CVRFs and diseases (13 men and 5 women, age: 69 ± 10 years).</p><p><strong>Independent variables: </strong>Patients completed a WF match and WA session of 2 x 10 min each. Video analysis was used to characterize movements during WF.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rate of perceived exertion (RPE, Borg Scale 6-20), % maximum heart rate (HR max ), musculoskeletal pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, 1-100 mm) before and up to 72 hours after exercise, and movement patterns during WF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean RPE during WF (12.1 ± 2.7) and WA (11.9 ± 3.0) did not differ ( P = 0.63). The mean HR during WF (79 ± 12% of HR max ) was higher than during WA (71% ± 11%; P < 0.01). The HR variability coefficient of variation during WF (10.3% ± 5.8%) and WA (7.1 ± 5.5%) did not differ ( P = 0.13). There was no influence of exercise mode (WF vs WA) on musculoskeletal pain perception ( P = 0.96 for interaction). Injury-inciting activities such as lunges (median: 0.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-1.3]) and goal kicks (median: 4 [IQR: 1.8-5.3]) occurred rarely during WF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Walking football might represent an alternative to WA for health prevention programs in patients with CVRF and diseases as it is characterized by a manageable cardiocirculatory strain, moderate RPE, low pain induction, and a low number of injury-inciting activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"462-468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical Demands of Walking Football in Patients With Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Egger, Anja Ditscheid, Markus Schwarz, Tim Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the exercise intensity of walking football (WF) with walking (WA) and to describe specific movement characteristics of WF.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sports facilities Saarland University, Germany.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Eighteen patients with cardiovascular risk factors CVRFs and diseases (13 men and 5 women, age: 69 ± 10 years).</p><p><strong>Independent variables: </strong>Patients completed a WF match and WA session of 2 x 10 min each. Video analysis was used to characterize movements during WF.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Rate of perceived exertion (RPE, Borg Scale 6-20), % maximum heart rate (HR max ), musculoskeletal pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, 1-100 mm) before and up to 72 hours after exercise, and movement patterns during WF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean RPE during WF (12.1 ± 2.7) and WA (11.9 ± 3.0) did not differ ( P = 0.63). The mean HR during WF (79 ± 12% of HR max ) was higher than during WA (71% ± 11%; P < 0.01). The HR variability coefficient of variation during WF (10.3% ± 5.8%) and WA (7.1 ± 5.5%) did not differ ( P = 0.13). There was no influence of exercise mode (WF vs WA) on musculoskeletal pain perception ( P = 0.96 for interaction). Injury-inciting activities such as lunges (median: 0.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-1.3]) and goal kicks (median: 4 [IQR: 1.8-5.3]) occurred rarely during WF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Walking football might represent an alternative to WA for health prevention programs in patients with CVRF and diseases as it is characterized by a manageable cardiocirculatory strain, moderate RPE, low pain induction, and a low number of injury-inciting activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"462-468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001218\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的比较步行足球（WF）和步行（WA）的运动强度，并描述步行足球的具体运动特征：设计：横断面研究：地点：德国萨尔州大学体育设施：18名具有心血管风险因素CVRFs和疾病的患者（13名男性和5名女性，年龄：69±10岁）：独立变量：患者完成 WF 比赛和 WA 训练，每次 2 x 10 分钟。视频分析用于描述 WF 期间的动作特征：主要结果测量指标：运动前和运动后 72 小时内的感知用力率（RPE，博格量表 6-20）、最大心率百分比（HRmax）、视觉模拟量表（VAS，1-100 毫米）显示的肌肉骨骼疼痛以及 WF 期间的运动模式：WF 期间的平均 RPE（12.1 ± 2.7）与 WA 期间的平均 RPE（11.9 ± 3.0）没有差异（P = 0.63）。WF 期间的平均心率（79 ± 12% HRmax）高于 WA 期间的平均心率（71% ± 11%；P < 0.01）。WF（10.3% ± 5.8%）和WA（7.1 ± 5.5%）期间的心率变异系数没有差异（P = 0.13）。运动模式（WF vs WA）对肌肉骨骼疼痛感没有影响（交互作用 P = 0.96）。肺活量（中位数：0.5[四分位间值中位数：0.5 [四分位数间距 (IQR) 0-1.3])和射门（中位数：4 [四分位数间距 (IQR) 1.8-5.3]）：结论：对于患有 CVRF 和疾病的患者来说，步行足球可能是西雅图健康预防计划的替代方案，因为它具有可控的心血管负荷、适度的 RPE、较低的疼痛感和较少的致伤活动。
Patients: Eighteen patients with cardiovascular risk factors CVRFs and diseases (13 men and 5 women, age: 69 ± 10 years).
Independent variables: Patients completed a WF match and WA session of 2 x 10 min each. Video analysis was used to characterize movements during WF.
Main outcome measures: Rate of perceived exertion (RPE, Borg Scale 6-20), % maximum heart rate (HR max ), musculoskeletal pain on a visual analog scale (VAS, 1-100 mm) before and up to 72 hours after exercise, and movement patterns during WF.
Results: The mean RPE during WF (12.1 ± 2.7) and WA (11.9 ± 3.0) did not differ ( P = 0.63). The mean HR during WF (79 ± 12% of HR max ) was higher than during WA (71% ± 11%; P < 0.01). The HR variability coefficient of variation during WF (10.3% ± 5.8%) and WA (7.1 ± 5.5%) did not differ ( P = 0.13). There was no influence of exercise mode (WF vs WA) on musculoskeletal pain perception ( P = 0.96 for interaction). Injury-inciting activities such as lunges (median: 0.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-1.3]) and goal kicks (median: 4 [IQR: 1.8-5.3]) occurred rarely during WF.
Conclusions: Walking football might represent an alternative to WA for health prevention programs in patients with CVRF and diseases as it is characterized by a manageable cardiocirculatory strain, moderate RPE, low pain induction, and a low number of injury-inciting activities.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
