寻找璞玉：评估慢性疼痛荟萃分析的质量--信息图表

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-105447

Nasir Hussain, Ryan S D'Souza

{"title":"寻找璞玉：评估慢性疼痛荟萃分析的质量--信息图表","authors":"Nasir Hussain, Ryan S D'Souza","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an increasing number of meta-analyses (MAs) investigating spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of pain; however, the quality of these has not previously been appraised. Kleppel et al [1][1] evaluate the methodological and statistical characteristics of MAs concerning SCS as a","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding diamonds in the rough: evaluating the quality of meta-analyses in chronic pain – an infographic\",\"authors\":\"Nasir Hussain, Ryan S D'Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is an increasing number of meta-analyses (MAs) investigating spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of pain; however, the quality of these has not previously been appraised. Kleppel et al [1][1] evaluate the methodological and statistical characteristics of MAs concerning SCS as a\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

研究脊髓刺激（SCS）治疗疼痛的荟萃分析（MAs）越来越多；然而，这些荟萃分析的质量此前尚未进行过评估。Kleppel 等人[1][1] 评估了有关脊髓刺激作为一种治疗方法的荟萃分析的方法学和统计学特征。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Finding diamonds in the rough: evaluating the quality of meta-analyses in chronic pain – an infographic

There is an increasing number of meta-analyses (MAs) investigating spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of pain; however, the quality of these has not previously been appraised. Kleppel et al [1][1] evaluate the methodological and statistical characteristics of MAs concerning SCS as a

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

自引率

0.00%

发文量