John-Paul B Etheridge, Roderick J Finlayson, Jan Venter, Frederik De Villiers, Jonathan P Etheridge, Reece Wakefield, Arraya Watanitanon
{"title":"使用平面内技术对超声引导下颈椎内侧支阻滞安全性的前瞻性评估","authors":"John-Paul B Etheridge, Roderick J Finlayson, Jan Venter, Frederik De Villiers, Jonathan P Etheridge, Reece Wakefield, Arraya Watanitanon","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background While fluoroscopic guidance is currently the imaging standard for cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs), ultrasound guidance (USG) offers several potential safety advantages such as real-time needle visualization and the ability to detect and avoid critical soft tissue vascular or neural structures. However, no large-scale trials have examined the safety of USG for CMBB. Methods Five hundred patients undergoing 2308 individual block levels were recruited using a prospective cohort design, and blocks were performed in an outpatient office setting using an in-plane USG technique. Primary outcomes included immediate block-related complication, as well as delayed occurrences, in the following 2 weeks. Vascular structures adjacent to the target area, as well as the occurrence of vascular breach, were recorded. Results Three minor immediate complications were noted (two subcutaneous hematomas, one vasovagal reaction) comprising 0.13% of blocks (0.03% to 0.38%; 95% two-sided CI), and no delayed events were recorded (0% to 0.16%; 97.5% one-sided CI). Blood vessels were detected and avoided in 8.2% of blocks, and vascular breach was noted in 0.52% of blocks (0.27% to 0.91%; 95% two-sided CI). Conclusion When performed using an in-plane technique by experienced operators, USG CMBB was found to be safe, with rare minor immediate complications and no further adverse event reported in the following 2 weeks. Trial registration number [NCT04852393][1]. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04852393&atom=%2Frapm%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F19%2Frapm-2024-105296.atom","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective evaluation of the safety of ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks using the in-plane technique\",\"authors\":\"John-Paul B Etheridge, Roderick J Finlayson, Jan Venter, Frederik De Villiers, Jonathan P Etheridge, Reece Wakefield, Arraya Watanitanon\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background While fluoroscopic guidance is currently the imaging standard for cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs), ultrasound guidance (USG) offers several potential safety advantages such as real-time needle visualization and the ability to detect and avoid critical soft tissue vascular or neural structures. However, no large-scale trials have examined the safety of USG for CMBB. Methods Five hundred patients undergoing 2308 individual block levels were recruited using a prospective cohort design, and blocks were performed in an outpatient office setting using an in-plane USG technique. Primary outcomes included immediate block-related complication, as well as delayed occurrences, in the following 2 weeks. Vascular structures adjacent to the target area, as well as the occurrence of vascular breach, were recorded. Results Three minor immediate complications were noted (two subcutaneous hematomas, one vasovagal reaction) comprising 0.13% of blocks (0.03% to 0.38%; 95% two-sided CI), and no delayed events were recorded (0% to 0.16%; 97.5% one-sided CI). Blood vessels were detected and avoided in 8.2% of blocks, and vascular breach was noted in 0.52% of blocks (0.27% to 0.91%; 95% two-sided CI). Conclusion When performed using an in-plane technique by experienced operators, USG CMBB was found to be safe, with rare minor immediate complications and no further adverse event reported in the following 2 weeks. Trial registration number [NCT04852393][1]. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04852393&atom=%2Frapm%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F19%2Frapm-2024-105296.atom\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prospective evaluation of the safety of ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch blocks using the in-plane technique
Background While fluoroscopic guidance is currently the imaging standard for cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs), ultrasound guidance (USG) offers several potential safety advantages such as real-time needle visualization and the ability to detect and avoid critical soft tissue vascular or neural structures. However, no large-scale trials have examined the safety of USG for CMBB. Methods Five hundred patients undergoing 2308 individual block levels were recruited using a prospective cohort design, and blocks were performed in an outpatient office setting using an in-plane USG technique. Primary outcomes included immediate block-related complication, as well as delayed occurrences, in the following 2 weeks. Vascular structures adjacent to the target area, as well as the occurrence of vascular breach, were recorded. Results Three minor immediate complications were noted (two subcutaneous hematomas, one vasovagal reaction) comprising 0.13% of blocks (0.03% to 0.38%; 95% two-sided CI), and no delayed events were recorded (0% to 0.16%; 97.5% one-sided CI). Blood vessels were detected and avoided in 8.2% of blocks, and vascular breach was noted in 0.52% of blocks (0.27% to 0.91%; 95% two-sided CI). Conclusion When performed using an in-plane technique by experienced operators, USG CMBB was found to be safe, with rare minor immediate complications and no further adverse event reported in the following 2 weeks. Trial registration number [NCT04852393][1]. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04852393&atom=%2Frapm%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F19%2Frapm-2024-105296.atom