{"title":"孔洞论证与诺特定理的结合","authors":"Henrique Gomes","doi":"arxiv-2403.10970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hole argument of general relativity threatens a radical and pernicious\nform of indeterminism. One natural response to the argument is that points\nbelonging to different but isometric models should always be identified, or\n'dragged-along', by the diffeomorphism that relates them. In this paper, I\nfirst criticise this response and its construal of isometry: it stumbles on\ncertain cases, like Noether's second theorem. Then I go on to describe how the\nessential features of Einstein\\rq{}s `point-coincidence' response to the hole\nargument avoid the criticisms of the `drag-along response' and are compatible\nwith Noether's second theorem.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The hole argument meets Noether's theorem\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Gomes\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2403.10970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The hole argument of general relativity threatens a radical and pernicious\\nform of indeterminism. One natural response to the argument is that points\\nbelonging to different but isometric models should always be identified, or\\n'dragged-along', by the diffeomorphism that relates them. In this paper, I\\nfirst criticise this response and its construal of isometry: it stumbles on\\ncertain cases, like Noether's second theorem. Then I go on to describe how the\\nessential features of Einstein\\\\rq{}s `point-coincidence' response to the hole\\nargument avoid the criticisms of the `drag-along response' and are compatible\\nwith Noether's second theorem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.10970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.10970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The hole argument of general relativity threatens a radical and pernicious
form of indeterminism. One natural response to the argument is that points
belonging to different but isometric models should always be identified, or
'dragged-along', by the diffeomorphism that relates them. In this paper, I
first criticise this response and its construal of isometry: it stumbles on
certain cases, like Noether's second theorem. Then I go on to describe how the
essential features of Einstein\rq{}s `point-coincidence' response to the hole
argument avoid the criticisms of the `drag-along response' and are compatible
with Noether's second theorem.