利用综合指数或多元校准在高组内信号选择性条件下确定类似物质的总含量

IF 0.9 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
V. I. Vershinin, A. E. Abramova
{"title":"利用综合指数或多元校准在高组内信号选择性条件下确定类似物质的总含量","authors":"V. I. Vershinin,&nbsp;A. E. Abramova","doi":"10.1134/S0020168523140145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The total content <i>c</i><sub>Σ</sub> of similar organic compounds is conventionally determined without their separation by measuring their generalized spectral signals at one or several analytical wavelengths. The possibility of the correct <i>c</i><sub>Σ</sub> estimation with the strongly pronounced intragroup selectivity of signals has not been previously tested. To verify this group analysis option, model hexane solutions of the known composition containing mono-, bi-, and tricyclic arenes at <i>c</i><sub>Σ</sub> ~ 10<sup>–4</sup> mol/dm<sup>3</sup> simultaneously have been analyzed. At a fixed wavelength, the molar absorptivities of arenes with different numbers of rings differ by two to three orders of magnitude. Two options of group analysis have been compared: (i) measuring the generalized signal of arenes at 260 nm with the subsequent calculation of the result using the univariate calibration in terms of naphthalene or anthracene and (ii) measuring the generalized signals at <i>m</i> wavelengths in the spectral range of 250–290 nm with the subsequent calculation of the result using the inverted multivariate calibration. The first method (the calculation of the total index) has led to large systematic errors, sometimes over 100% in the absolute value, which do not decrease upon variation in the wavelength and nature of a standard substance. The second method has ensured more correct results, and already at <i>m</i> = 11, the errors of group analysis have been no more than 10%. Thus, at the strongly pronounced intragroup selectivity of the signals, the group analysis can and should be carried out using inverted multivariate calibrations. It has been established that the errors of <i>c</i><sub>Σ</sub> estimation sharply grow if a sample contains components of a desired group that were not taken into account when constructing the inverted calibration.</p>","PeriodicalId":585,"journal":{"name":"Inorganic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the Total Content of Similar Substances Using Integrated Indices or Multivariate Calibrations at a High Intragroup Selectivity of Signals\",\"authors\":\"V. I. Vershinin,&nbsp;A. E. Abramova\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0020168523140145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The total content <i>c</i><sub>Σ</sub> of similar organic compounds is conventionally determined without their separation by measuring their generalized spectral signals at one or several analytical wavelengths. The possibility of the correct <i>c</i><sub>Σ</sub> estimation with the strongly pronounced intragroup selectivity of signals has not been previously tested. To verify this group analysis option, model hexane solutions of the known composition containing mono-, bi-, and tricyclic arenes at <i>c</i><sub>Σ</sub> ~ 10<sup>–4</sup> mol/dm<sup>3</sup> simultaneously have been analyzed. At a fixed wavelength, the molar absorptivities of arenes with different numbers of rings differ by two to three orders of magnitude. Two options of group analysis have been compared: (i) measuring the generalized signal of arenes at 260 nm with the subsequent calculation of the result using the univariate calibration in terms of naphthalene or anthracene and (ii) measuring the generalized signals at <i>m</i> wavelengths in the spectral range of 250–290 nm with the subsequent calculation of the result using the inverted multivariate calibration. The first method (the calculation of the total index) has led to large systematic errors, sometimes over 100% in the absolute value, which do not decrease upon variation in the wavelength and nature of a standard substance. The second method has ensured more correct results, and already at <i>m</i> = 11, the errors of group analysis have been no more than 10%. Thus, at the strongly pronounced intragroup selectivity of the signals, the group analysis can and should be carried out using inverted multivariate calibrations. It has been established that the errors of <i>c</i><sub>Σ</sub> estimation sharply grow if a sample contains components of a desired group that were not taken into account when constructing the inverted calibration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inorganic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inorganic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0020168523140145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inorganic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0020168523140145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 类似有机化合物的总含量 cΣ 通常是通过测量它们在一个或几个分析波长上的通用光谱信号,在不分离它们的情况下确定的。在组内信号选择性非常明显的情况下,正确估算 cΣ 的可能性尚未得到验证。为了验证这种组分析选择,我们同时分析了已知成分的正己烷模型溶液,其中含有 cΣ ~ 10-4 mol/dm3 的单环、双环和三环烷烃。在固定波长下,不同环数的烷烃的摩尔吸收率相差两到三个数量级。我们对两种分组分析方法进行了比较:(i) 在 260 纳米波长处测量烷烃的广义信号,然后使用萘或蒽的单变量校准法计算结果;(ii) 在 250-290 纳米波长的光谱范围内的 m 个波长处测量广义信号,然后使用倒置多变量校准法计算结果。第一种方法(计算总指数)会导致较大的系统误差,有时绝对值会超过 100%,而且这种误差不会随着波长和标准物质性质的变化而减小。第二种方法确保了更正确的结果,在 m = 11 时,分组分析的误差已经不超过 10%。因此,在信号的组内选择性非常明显的情况下,组分析可以而且应该使用倒置多元定标法进行。已经证实,如果样本中含有在构建反向定标时未考虑在内的所需组别成分,cΣ 估计的误差会急剧增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining the Total Content of Similar Substances Using Integrated Indices or Multivariate Calibrations at a High Intragroup Selectivity of Signals

The total content cΣ of similar organic compounds is conventionally determined without their separation by measuring their generalized spectral signals at one or several analytical wavelengths. The possibility of the correct cΣ estimation with the strongly pronounced intragroup selectivity of signals has not been previously tested. To verify this group analysis option, model hexane solutions of the known composition containing mono-, bi-, and tricyclic arenes at cΣ ~ 10–4 mol/dm3 simultaneously have been analyzed. At a fixed wavelength, the molar absorptivities of arenes with different numbers of rings differ by two to three orders of magnitude. Two options of group analysis have been compared: (i) measuring the generalized signal of arenes at 260 nm with the subsequent calculation of the result using the univariate calibration in terms of naphthalene or anthracene and (ii) measuring the generalized signals at m wavelengths in the spectral range of 250–290 nm with the subsequent calculation of the result using the inverted multivariate calibration. The first method (the calculation of the total index) has led to large systematic errors, sometimes over 100% in the absolute value, which do not decrease upon variation in the wavelength and nature of a standard substance. The second method has ensured more correct results, and already at m = 11, the errors of group analysis have been no more than 10%. Thus, at the strongly pronounced intragroup selectivity of the signals, the group analysis can and should be carried out using inverted multivariate calibrations. It has been established that the errors of cΣ estimation sharply grow if a sample contains components of a desired group that were not taken into account when constructing the inverted calibration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inorganic Materials
Inorganic Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Inorganic Materials is a journal that publishes reviews and original articles devoted to chemistry, physics, and applications of various inorganic materials including high-purity substances and materials. The journal discusses phase equilibria, including P–T–X diagrams, and the fundamentals of inorganic materials science, which determines preparatory conditions for compounds of various compositions with specified deviations from stoichiometry. Inorganic Materials is a multidisciplinary journal covering all classes of inorganic materials. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信