远程呼吸监测的居家验证:使用非接触式雷达生物运动传感器对呼吸系统患者进行长期护理的概念验证

Tobit Fischer, Torsten Eggert, Alina Wildenauer, Sarah Dietz-Terjung, Rainer Voisard, Christoph Schoebel
{"title":"远程呼吸监测的居家验证:使用非接触式雷达生物运动传感器对呼吸系统患者进行长期护理的概念验证","authors":"Tobit Fischer, Torsten Eggert, Alina Wildenauer, Sarah Dietz-Terjung, Rainer Voisard, Christoph Schoebel","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.17.24304031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Long-term monitoring of respiratory rate (RR) is promising for the management of chronic conditions. Research interest is particularly high in chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), especially for predicting acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term validity of a recent non-contact biomotion sensor in the home environment of CRD patients with domiciliary ventilator support, focusing on patient acceptance and usability of this device, as well as RR fluctuations related to AECOPD.\nPatients and methods In this prospective proof-of-concept study, 19 patients requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and seven patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were provided with the non-contact device for six and one month, respectively. Main indication for NIV therapy was COPD. Real-world validation of the device was performed by comparing nocturnal RR values between the non-contact system and both types of ventilators. The acceptance and operability of the biomotion sensor were evaluated using a questionnaire. COPD exacerbations that occurred during the study period were assessed for possible RR fluctuations preceding these events.\nResults Mean absolute error (MAE) of median RR between the NIV device and the non-contact system, based on 2326 nights, was 0.78 (SD: 1.96) breaths per minute (brpm). MAE between the IMV device and the non-contact system was 0.12 brpm (SD: 0.52) for 215 nights. The non-contact device was accepted by the patients and proved to be easy to use. In some of the overall 13 cases of AECOPD, RR time courses showed variations of increased nocturnal respiratory activity a few days before the occurrence of such events.\nConclusion The present non-contact system is suitable and well accepted for valid long-term monitoring of nocturnal RR in the patient's home environment. This finding may serve as a starting point for larger studies, e.g., to develop robust AECOPD prediction rules.","PeriodicalId":501074,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"At-home validation of remote breathing monitoring: A proof-of-concept for long-term care of respiratory patients using a non-contact, radar-based biomotion sensor\",\"authors\":\"Tobit Fischer, Torsten Eggert, Alina Wildenauer, Sarah Dietz-Terjung, Rainer Voisard, Christoph Schoebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.17.24304031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Long-term monitoring of respiratory rate (RR) is promising for the management of chronic conditions. Research interest is particularly high in chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), especially for predicting acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term validity of a recent non-contact biomotion sensor in the home environment of CRD patients with domiciliary ventilator support, focusing on patient acceptance and usability of this device, as well as RR fluctuations related to AECOPD.\\nPatients and methods In this prospective proof-of-concept study, 19 patients requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and seven patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were provided with the non-contact device for six and one month, respectively. Main indication for NIV therapy was COPD. Real-world validation of the device was performed by comparing nocturnal RR values between the non-contact system and both types of ventilators. The acceptance and operability of the biomotion sensor were evaluated using a questionnaire. COPD exacerbations that occurred during the study period were assessed for possible RR fluctuations preceding these events.\\nResults Mean absolute error (MAE) of median RR between the NIV device and the non-contact system, based on 2326 nights, was 0.78 (SD: 1.96) breaths per minute (brpm). MAE between the IMV device and the non-contact system was 0.12 brpm (SD: 0.52) for 215 nights. The non-contact device was accepted by the patients and proved to be easy to use. In some of the overall 13 cases of AECOPD, RR time courses showed variations of increased nocturnal respiratory activity a few days before the occurrence of such events.\\nConclusion The present non-contact system is suitable and well accepted for valid long-term monitoring of nocturnal RR in the patient's home environment. This finding may serve as a starting point for larger studies, e.g., to develop robust AECOPD prediction rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.17.24304031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.17.24304031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 长期监测呼吸频率(RR)对慢性疾病的管理大有可为。慢性呼吸系统疾病(CRD),尤其是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重的预测研究尤其受到关注。本研究的目的是评估最近推出的非接触式生物运动传感器在使用家用呼吸机支持的 CRD 患者家庭环境中的长期有效性,重点关注患者对该设备的接受程度和可用性,以及与 AECOPD 相关的 RR 波动。 在这项前瞻性概念验证研究中,19 名需要无创通气(NIV)的患者和 7 名需要有创机械通气(IMV)的患者分别接受了为期 6 个月和 1 个月的非接触式设备。NIV 治疗的主要适应症是慢性阻塞性肺病。通过比较非接触式系统和两种呼吸机的夜间 RR 值,对该设备进行了实际验证。通过问卷调查对生物运动传感器的接受度和可操作性进行了评估。对研究期间发生的慢性阻塞性肺病加重事件进行了评估,以确定这些事件发生前可能出现的 RR 波动。结果 基于 2326 个夜晚,NIV 设备与非接触式系统之间 RR 中位数的平均绝对误差(MAE)为 0.78(标度:1.96)次/分钟(brpm)。在 215 个夜晚中,IMV 设备与非接触式系统之间的 MAE 为 0.12 brpm(标准差:0.52)。患者接受了非接触式设备,并证明其易于使用。在总共 13 例 AECOPD 患者中,有些患者的 RR 时间轨迹显示,在此类事件发生前几天,夜间呼吸活动增加。这一发现可作为更大规模研究的起点,例如,用于开发可靠的 AECOPD 预测规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
At-home validation of remote breathing monitoring: A proof-of-concept for long-term care of respiratory patients using a non-contact, radar-based biomotion sensor
Purpose Long-term monitoring of respiratory rate (RR) is promising for the management of chronic conditions. Research interest is particularly high in chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), especially for predicting acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term validity of a recent non-contact biomotion sensor in the home environment of CRD patients with domiciliary ventilator support, focusing on patient acceptance and usability of this device, as well as RR fluctuations related to AECOPD. Patients and methods In this prospective proof-of-concept study, 19 patients requiring non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and seven patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were provided with the non-contact device for six and one month, respectively. Main indication for NIV therapy was COPD. Real-world validation of the device was performed by comparing nocturnal RR values between the non-contact system and both types of ventilators. The acceptance and operability of the biomotion sensor were evaluated using a questionnaire. COPD exacerbations that occurred during the study period were assessed for possible RR fluctuations preceding these events. Results Mean absolute error (MAE) of median RR between the NIV device and the non-contact system, based on 2326 nights, was 0.78 (SD: 1.96) breaths per minute (brpm). MAE between the IMV device and the non-contact system was 0.12 brpm (SD: 0.52) for 215 nights. The non-contact device was accepted by the patients and proved to be easy to use. In some of the overall 13 cases of AECOPD, RR time courses showed variations of increased nocturnal respiratory activity a few days before the occurrence of such events. Conclusion The present non-contact system is suitable and well accepted for valid long-term monitoring of nocturnal RR in the patient's home environment. This finding may serve as a starting point for larger studies, e.g., to develop robust AECOPD prediction rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信