针对任何结果和异质性的普通最小二乘法和工具变量估算器

Myoung-jae Lee, Chirok Han
{"title":"针对任何结果和异质性的普通最小二乘法和工具变量估算器","authors":"Myoung-jae Lee, Chirok Han","doi":"10.1177/1536867x241233645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given an exogenous treatment d and covariates x, an ordinary least-squares (OLS) estimator is often applied with a noncontinuous outcome y to find the effect of d, despite the fact that the OLS linear model is invalid. Also, when d is endogenous with an instrument z, an instrumental-variables estimator (IVE) is often applied, again despite the invalid linear model. Furthermore, the treatment effect is likely to be heterogeneous, say, µ<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>(x), not a constant as assumed in most linear models. Given these problems, the question is then what kind of effect the OLS and IVE actually estimate. Under some restrictive conditions such as a “saturated model”, the estimated effect is known to be a weighted average, say, E{ ω(x) µ<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>(x)}, but in general, OLS and the IVE applied to linear models with a noncontinuous outcome or heterogeneous effect fail to yield a weighted average of heterogeneous treatment effects. Recently, however, it has been found that E{ ω(x) µ<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>(x)} can be estimated by OLS and the IVE without those restrictive conditions if the “propensity-score residual” d − E( d| x) or the “instrument-score residual” z−E( z| x) is used. In this article, we review this recent development and provide a command for OLS and the IVE with the propensity- and instrument-score residuals, which are applicable to any outcome and any heterogeneous effect.","PeriodicalId":501101,"journal":{"name":"The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ordinary least squares and instrumental-variables estimators for any outcome and heterogeneity\",\"authors\":\"Myoung-jae Lee, Chirok Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1536867x241233645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given an exogenous treatment d and covariates x, an ordinary least-squares (OLS) estimator is often applied with a noncontinuous outcome y to find the effect of d, despite the fact that the OLS linear model is invalid. Also, when d is endogenous with an instrument z, an instrumental-variables estimator (IVE) is often applied, again despite the invalid linear model. Furthermore, the treatment effect is likely to be heterogeneous, say, µ<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>(x), not a constant as assumed in most linear models. Given these problems, the question is then what kind of effect the OLS and IVE actually estimate. Under some restrictive conditions such as a “saturated model”, the estimated effect is known to be a weighted average, say, E{ ω(x) µ<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>(x)}, but in general, OLS and the IVE applied to linear models with a noncontinuous outcome or heterogeneous effect fail to yield a weighted average of heterogeneous treatment effects. Recently, however, it has been found that E{ ω(x) µ<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>(x)} can be estimated by OLS and the IVE without those restrictive conditions if the “propensity-score residual” d − E( d| x) or the “instrument-score residual” z−E( z| x) is used. In this article, we review this recent development and provide a command for OLS and the IVE with the propensity- and instrument-score residuals, which are applicable to any outcome and any heterogeneous effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x241233645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x241233645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

给定外生治疗 d 和协变因素 x,尽管 OLS 线性模型无效,但普通最小二乘法(OLS)估计法经常用于非连续结果 y,以发现 d 的影响。此外,当 d 是内生的,有一个工具 z 时,尽管线性模型无效,也经常使用工具变量估计法(IVE)。此外,治疗效果很可能是异质性的,例如 µ1(x),而不是大多数线性模型假设的常数。鉴于这些问题,问题就在于 OLS 和 IVE 实际估计的是哪种效应。在某些限制条件下,如 "饱和模型",已知估计的效应是一个加权平均值,如 E{ ω(x) µ1(x)} ,但一般来说,OLS 和 IVE 应用于具有非连续结果或异质效应的线性模型时,无法得到异质治疗效应的加权平均值。然而,最近研究发现,如果使用 "倾向得分残差 "d - E( d| x) 或 "工具得分残差 "z-E( z| x),E{ ω(x) µ1(x)} 可以通过 OLS 和 IVE 估计,而无需这些限制性条件。在本文中,我们回顾了这一最新进展,并提供了使用倾向得分残差和工具得分残差的 OLS 和 IVE 命令,该命令适用于任何结果和任何异质效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ordinary least squares and instrumental-variables estimators for any outcome and heterogeneity
Given an exogenous treatment d and covariates x, an ordinary least-squares (OLS) estimator is often applied with a noncontinuous outcome y to find the effect of d, despite the fact that the OLS linear model is invalid. Also, when d is endogenous with an instrument z, an instrumental-variables estimator (IVE) is often applied, again despite the invalid linear model. Furthermore, the treatment effect is likely to be heterogeneous, say, µ1(x), not a constant as assumed in most linear models. Given these problems, the question is then what kind of effect the OLS and IVE actually estimate. Under some restrictive conditions such as a “saturated model”, the estimated effect is known to be a weighted average, say, E{ ω(x) µ1(x)}, but in general, OLS and the IVE applied to linear models with a noncontinuous outcome or heterogeneous effect fail to yield a weighted average of heterogeneous treatment effects. Recently, however, it has been found that E{ ω(x) µ1(x)} can be estimated by OLS and the IVE without those restrictive conditions if the “propensity-score residual” d − E( d| x) or the “instrument-score residual” z−E( z| x) is used. In this article, we review this recent development and provide a command for OLS and the IVE with the propensity- and instrument-score residuals, which are applicable to any outcome and any heterogeneous effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信