重复低强度红光疗法控制学龄儿童近视的三个月中期分析:多种族随机对照试验

Nellie Deen, Zhuoting Zhu, Ziyi Qi, Yuri Yin-Moe Aung, Gabriella Bulloch, Di Mao, Mingguang He
{"title":"重复低强度红光疗法控制学龄儿童近视的三个月中期分析:多种族随机对照试验","authors":"Nellie Deen, Zhuoting Zhu, Ziyi Qi, Yuri Yin-Moe Aung, Gabriella Bulloch, Di Mao, Mingguang He","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.16.24304399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic school-aged children. This report focuses on 3-month interim analysis.\nDesign: Multi-ethnic, parallel controlled randomized trial\nParticipants: A total of 34 children aged 8-13 years with myopia of cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) of − 0.50 to − 5.00 (inclusive) diopters (D), astigmatism of 2.50 D or less, anisometropia of 1.50 D or less, and monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20 or better were enrolled.\nMethods: Participants were randomly assigned to the RLRL group (n = 16) or the single-vision spectacles (SVS) group (n = 18). RLRL therapy was administered twice daily on weekdays for 3-minute sessions, while the SVS group continued routine activities. Assessments were scheduled at baseline and follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, with compliance monitoring and safety assessments throughout.\nMain Outcome Measures: The primary outcome and a key secondary outcome included axial length (AL) change and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) change. Results: A total of 31 (91.2%) participated in the 3-month follow-up visit. The RLRL group demonstrated a significant shortening in AL (-0.07 ± 0.07 mm) compared to the SVS group (0.03 ± 0.05 mm, P<0.001). Similarly, SE progression was hyperopic shift in the RLRL group (0.26 ± 0.14 D) while the SVS group exhibited a myopic shift (-0.03 ± 0.38 D, P=0.009). No severe adverse events were reported.\nConclusions: The 3-month interim analysis shows that the efficacy of RLRL therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic children is comparable to, or even better than, that idenfied in Chinese patients in previous trials.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-Month Interim Analyses of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy in Myopia Control in Schoolchildren: A Multi-Ethnic Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Nellie Deen, Zhuoting Zhu, Ziyi Qi, Yuri Yin-Moe Aung, Gabriella Bulloch, Di Mao, Mingguang He\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.16.24304399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic school-aged children. This report focuses on 3-month interim analysis.\\nDesign: Multi-ethnic, parallel controlled randomized trial\\nParticipants: A total of 34 children aged 8-13 years with myopia of cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) of − 0.50 to − 5.00 (inclusive) diopters (D), astigmatism of 2.50 D or less, anisometropia of 1.50 D or less, and monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20 or better were enrolled.\\nMethods: Participants were randomly assigned to the RLRL group (n = 16) or the single-vision spectacles (SVS) group (n = 18). RLRL therapy was administered twice daily on weekdays for 3-minute sessions, while the SVS group continued routine activities. Assessments were scheduled at baseline and follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, with compliance monitoring and safety assessments throughout.\\nMain Outcome Measures: The primary outcome and a key secondary outcome included axial length (AL) change and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) change. Results: A total of 31 (91.2%) participated in the 3-month follow-up visit. The RLRL group demonstrated a significant shortening in AL (-0.07 ± 0.07 mm) compared to the SVS group (0.03 ± 0.05 mm, P<0.001). Similarly, SE progression was hyperopic shift in the RLRL group (0.26 ± 0.14 D) while the SVS group exhibited a myopic shift (-0.03 ± 0.38 D, P=0.009). No severe adverse events were reported.\\nConclusions: The 3-month interim analysis shows that the efficacy of RLRL therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic children is comparable to, or even better than, that idenfied in Chinese patients in previous trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.16.24304399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.16.24304399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估重复低强度红光疗法(RLRL)在控制多种族学龄儿童近视发展方面的有效性和安全性。本报告侧重于 3 个月的中期分析:设计:多种族平行对照随机试验:共招募了 34 名 8-13 岁的儿童,这些儿童的近视度数为球面等效度数 (SE) - 0.50 至 - 5.00(含)diopters (D),散光度数为 2.50 D 或以下,内斜视度数为 1.50 D 或以下,单眼最佳矫正视力 (BCVA) 为 20/20 或以上:参与者被随机分配到 RLRL 组(n = 16)或单眼视力眼镜 (SVS) 组(n = 18)。RLRL治疗在工作日每天进行两次,每次3分钟,而SVS组则继续日常活动。在基线和 1、3、6 和 12 个月的随访中安排了评估,并在整个过程中进行依从性监测和安全性评估:主要结果和一个关键的次要结果包括轴长(AL)变化和屈光球面等值(SE)变化。结果共有 31 人(91.2%)参加了 3 个月的随访。与 SVS 组(0.03 ± 0.05 mm,P<0.001)相比,RLRL 组的 AL 显著缩短(-0.07 ± 0.07 mm)。同样,RLRL 组的 SE 进展为远视偏移(0.26 ± 0.14 D),而 SVS 组表现为近视偏移(-0.03 ± 0.38 D,P=0.009)。无严重不良事件报告:3个月的中期分析表明,RLRL疗法在控制多民族儿童近视发展方面的疗效与以往试验中发现的中国患者的疗效相当,甚至更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three-Month Interim Analyses of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy in Myopia Control in Schoolchildren: A Multi-Ethnic Randomized Controlled Trial
Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic school-aged children. This report focuses on 3-month interim analysis. Design: Multi-ethnic, parallel controlled randomized trial Participants: A total of 34 children aged 8-13 years with myopia of cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) of − 0.50 to − 5.00 (inclusive) diopters (D), astigmatism of 2.50 D or less, anisometropia of 1.50 D or less, and monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20 or better were enrolled. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to the RLRL group (n = 16) or the single-vision spectacles (SVS) group (n = 18). RLRL therapy was administered twice daily on weekdays for 3-minute sessions, while the SVS group continued routine activities. Assessments were scheduled at baseline and follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, with compliance monitoring and safety assessments throughout. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome and a key secondary outcome included axial length (AL) change and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) change. Results: A total of 31 (91.2%) participated in the 3-month follow-up visit. The RLRL group demonstrated a significant shortening in AL (-0.07 ± 0.07 mm) compared to the SVS group (0.03 ± 0.05 mm, P<0.001). Similarly, SE progression was hyperopic shift in the RLRL group (0.26 ± 0.14 D) while the SVS group exhibited a myopic shift (-0.03 ± 0.38 D, P=0.009). No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The 3-month interim analysis shows that the efficacy of RLRL therapy in controlling myopia progression among multi-ethnic children is comparable to, or even better than, that idenfied in Chinese patients in previous trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信